(Also, when this is fixed, we can enable the code in PROCLAIM which
checks for incompatible FTYPE redeclarations.)
-18:
- from DTC on the CMU CL mailing list 25 Feb 2000:
-;;; Compiler fails when this file is compiled.
-;;;
-;;; Problem shows up in delete-block within ir1util.lisp. The assertion
-;;; (assert (member (functional-kind lambda) '(:let :mv-let :assignment)))
-;;; fails within bind node branch.
-;;;
-;;; Note that if c::*check-consistency* is enabled then an un-reached
-;;; entry is also reported.
-;;;
-(defun foo (val)
- (declare (values nil))
- nil)
-(defun bug (val)
- (multiple-value-call
- #'(lambda (res)
- (block nil
- (tagbody
- loop
- (when res
- (return nil))
- (go loop))))
- (foo val))
- (catch 'ccc1
- (throw 'ccc1
- (block bbbb
- (tagbody
-
- (let ((ttt #'(lambda () (go cccc))))
- (declare (special ttt))
- (return-from bbbb nil))
-
- cccc
- (return-from bbbb nil))))))
-
19:
(I *think* this is a bug. It certainly seems like strange behavior. But
- the ANSI spec is scary, dark, and deep..)
+ the ANSI spec is scary, dark, and deep.. -- WHN)
(FORMAT NIL "~,1G" 1.4) => "1. "
(FORMAT NIL "~3,1G" 1.4) => "1. "
Process inferior-lisp exited abnormally with code 1
I haven't noticed a repeatable case of this yet.
-29:
- some sort of bug in inlining and RETURN-FROM in sbcl-0.6.5: Compiling
- (DEFUN BAR? (X)
- (OR (NAR? X)
- (BLOCK USED-BY-SOME-Y?
- (FLET ((FROB (STK)
- (DOLIST (Y STK)
- (UNLESS (REJECTED? Y)
- (RETURN-FROM USED-BY-SOME-Y? T)))))
- (DECLARE (INLINE FROB))
- (FROB (RSTK X))
- (FROB (MRSTK X)))
- NIL)))
- gives
- error in function SB-KERNEL:ASSERT-ERROR:
- The assertion (EQ (SB-C::CONTINUATION-KIND SB-C::CONT) :BLOCK-START) failed.
- This is still present in sbcl-0.6.8.
-
31:
In some cases the compiler believes type declarations on array
elements without checking them, e.g.
(Also, verify that the compiler handles declared function
return types as assertions.)
-38:
- DEFMETHOD doesn't check the syntax of &REST argument lists properly,
- accepting &REST even when it's not followed by an argument name:
- (DEFMETHOD FOO ((X T) &REST) NIL)
-
41:
TYPEP of VALUES types is sometimes implemented very inefficiently, e.g. in
(DEFTYPE INDEXOID () '(INTEGER 0 1000))
;; no problem, can just use the ordinary expansion
`(function (setf ,place-function-name))))
-99:
- DESCRIBE interacts poorly with *PRINT-CIRCLE*, e.g. the output from
- (let ((*print-circle* t)) (describe (make-hash-table)))
- is weird,
- #<HASH-TABLE :TEST EQL :COUNT 0 {90BBFC5}> is an . (EQL)
- Its SIZE is 16.
- Its REHASH-SIZE is 1.5. Its REHASH-THRESHOLD is . (1.0)
- It holds 0 key/value pairs.
- where the ". (EQL)" and ". (1.0)" substrings are screwups.
- (This is likely a pretty-printer problem which happens to
- be exercised by DESCRIBE, not actually a DESCRIBE problem.)
-
100:
There's apparently a bug in CEILING optimization which caused
Douglas Crosher to patch the CMU CL version. Martin Atzmueller
/usr/stuff/sbcl/src/code/host-alieneval.lisp
Created: Monday, March 12, 2001 07:47:43 AM CST
-105:
- (DESCRIBE 'STREAM-READ-BYTE)
-
106:
(reported by Eric Marsden on cmucl-imp 2001-06-15)
(and APD pointed out on sbcl-devel 2001-12-29 that it's the same
still some functions named "hairy arg processor" and
"SB-INT:&MORE processor".
-138:
- a pair of cross-compiler bugs in sbcl-0.pre7.107
-
-138a:
- $ cat > /tmp/bug138.lisp << EOF
- (in-package "SB!KERNEL")
- (defun f-c-l (name parent-types)
- (let* ((cpl (mapcar (lambda (x)
- (condition-class-cpl x))
- parent-types))
- (new-inherits
- (concatenate 'simple-vector
- (layout-inherits cond-layout))))
- (if (not (mismatch (layout-inherits olayout) new-inherits))
- olayout
- (make-layout))))
- EOF
- $ sbcl --core output/after-xc.core
- ...
- * (target-compile-file "/tmp/bug138.lisp")
- ...
- internal error, failed AVER:
- "(COMMON-LISP:MEMBER SB!C::FUN (SB!C::COMPONENT-LAMBDAS SB!C:COMPONENT))"
-
- It seems as though this xc bug is likely to correspond to a bug in the
- ordinary compiler, but I haven't yet found a test case which causes
- this problem in the ordinary compiler.
-
- related weirdness: Using #'(LAMBDA (X) ...) instead of (LAMBDA (X) ...)
- makes the assertion failure go away.
-
-138b:
- Even when you relax the AVER that fails in 138a, there's another
- problem cross-compiling the same code:
- internal error, failed AVER:
- "(COMMON-LISP:ZEROP
- (COMMON-LISP:HASH-TABLE-COUNT
- (SB!FASL::FASL-OUTPUT-PATCH-TABLE SB!FASL:FASL-OUTPUT)))"
-
- The same problem appears in the simpler test case
- (in-package "SB!KERNEL")
- (defun f-c-l ()
- (let ((cpl (foo (lambda (x)
- (condition-class-cpl x))))
- (new-inherits (layout-inherits cond-layout)))
- (layout-inherits olayout)))
-
- Changing CONDITION-CLASS-CPL or (either of the calls to) LAYOUT-INHERITS
- to arbitrary nonmagic not-defined-yet just-do-a-full-call functions makes
- the problem go away. Also, even in this simpler test case which fails
- on a very different AVER, the 138a weirdness about s/(lambda/#'(lambda/
- making the problem go away is preserved.
-
- I still haven't found any way to make this happen in the ordinary
- (not cross-) SBCL compiler, nor in CMU CL.
-
-138c:
- In sbcl-0.pre7.111 I added an assertion upstream, in IR2-CONVERT-CLOSURE,
- which fails for the test case above but doesn't keep the system
- from cross-compiling itself or passing its tests.
-
- I traced IR1-CONVERT-LAMBDA (with :PRINT *CURRENT-COMPONENT*)
- and tracing various COMPONENT-manipulating functions like
- FIND-INITIAL-DFO, DFO-SCAVENGE-DEPENDENCY-GRAPH,
- JOIN-COMPONENTS, LOCALL-ANALYZE-COMPONENT, etc. From that,
- it looks as though the problem is that IR1-CONVERT-LAMBDA
- is being called by MAKE-EXTERNAL-ENTRY-POINT to
- create the mislaid LAMBDA in an environment set up by
- WITH-BELATED-IR1-ENVIRONMENT which has *CURRENT-COMPONENT* set
- to a component which is never seen again, and specifically never
- passed to LOCALL-ANALYZE-COMPONENT or JOIN-COMPONENTS, so that
- its NEW-FUNS list (where the mislaid LAMBDA is waiting patiently)
- gets lost. Thus, the LAMBDA is essentially being written into never
- never land. But I haven't figured out why. *CURRENT-COMPONENT* is set
- wrong? Something later on is dropping the ball and neglecting
- to look at all the components it should? Something else?
-
-139:
- In sbcl-0.pre7.107, (DIRECTORY "*.*") is broken, as reported by
- Nathan Froyd sbcl-devel 2001-12-28.
-
- Christophe Rhodes suggested (sbcl-devel 2001-12-30) converting
- the MERGED-PATHNAME expression in DEFUN DIRECTORY to
- (merged-pathname (merge-pathnames pathname
- *default-pathname-defaults*))
- This looks right, and fixes this bug, but it interacts with the NODES
- logic in %ENUMERATE-PATHNAMES to create a new bug, so that
- (DIRECTORY "../**/*.*") no longer shows files in the current working
- directory. Probably %ENUMERATE-PATHNAMES (or related logic like
- %ENUMERATE-MATCHES) needs to be patched as well.
-
- Note: The MERGED-PATHNAME change changes behavior incompatibly,
- making e.g. (DIRECTORY "*") no longer equivalent to (DIRECTORY "*.*"),
- so deserves a NEWS entry. E.g.
-* minor incompatible change (part of a bug fix by Christophe Rhodes
- to DIRECTORY behavior): DIRECTORY no longer implicitly promotes
- NIL slots of its pathname argument to :WILD, and in particular
- asking for the contents of a directory, which you used to be able
- to do without explicit wildcards, e.g. (DIRECTORY "/tmp/"),
- now needs explicit wildcards, e.g. (DIRECTORY "/tmp/*.*").
-
140:
(reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-01-03)
T
T
+141:
+ Pretty-printing nested backquotes doesn't work right, as
+ reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-01-13:
+ * '``(FOO ,@',@S)
+ ``(FOO SB-IMPL::BACKQ-COMMA-AT S)
+ * (lisp-implementation-version)
+ "0.pre7.129"
+
KNOWN BUGS RELATED TO THE IR1 INTERPRETER
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff