0.7.7.11:

[sbcl.git] / BUGS

diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS
index bd6adba..729c8d2 100644 (file)
--- a/BUGS
+++ b/BUGS
@@ -1299,6 +1299,13 @@ WORKAROUND:
      results in a STYLE-WARNING:
        undefined-function 
          SB-SLOT-ACCESSOR-NAME::|COMMON-LISP-USER A-CLASS-X slot READER|
+
+     APD's fix for this was checked in to sbcl-0.7.6.20, but Pierre
+     Mai points out that the declamation of functions is in fact
+     incorrect in some cases (most notably for structure
+     classes).  This means that at present erroneous attempts to use
+     WITH-SLOTS and the like on classes with metaclass STRUCTURE-CLASS
+     won't get the corresponding STYLE-WARNING.
   c. the examples in CLHS 7.6.5.1 (regarding generic function lambda
      lists and &KEY arguments) do not signal errors when they should.
 
@@ -1342,6 +1349,45 @@ WORKAROUND:
   error message stays the same (even BACKTRACE doesn't tell you what the
   bad argument value is).
 
+194: "no error from (THE REAL '(1 2 3)) in some cases"
+  In sbcl-0.7.7.9, 
+    (multiple-value-prog1 (progn (the real '(1 2 3))))
+  returns (1 2 3) instead of signalling an error. Also in sbcl-0.7.7.9,
+  a more complicated instance of this bug kept 
+  (IGNORE-ERRORS (MIN '(1 2 3))) from returning NIL as it should when
+  the MIN source transform expanded to (THE REAL '(1 2 3)), because
+  (IGNORE-ERRORS (THE REAL '(1 2 3))) returns (1 2 3).
+  Alexey Dejneka pointed out that
+  (IGNORE-ERRORS (IDENTITY (THE REAL '(1 2 3)))) works as it should.
+  (IGNORE-ERRORS (VALUES (THE REAL '(1 2 3)))) also works as it should.
+  Perhaps this is another case of VALUES type intersections behaving
+  in non-useful ways?
+    When I (WHN) tried to use the VALUES trick to work around this bug
+  in the MIN source transform, it didn't work for
+    (assert (null (ignore-errors (min 1 #(1 2 3)))))
+  Hand-expanding the source transform, I get
+    (assert (null (ignore-errors
+                   (let ((arg1 1)
+                         (arg2 (identity (the real #(1 2 3)))))
+                     (if (< arg1 arg2) arg1 arg2))))) 
+  which fails (i.e. the assertion fails, because the IGNORE-ERRORS
+  doesn't report MIN signalling a type error). At the REPL
+    (null (ignore-errors
+           (let ((arg1 1)
+                 (arg2 (identity (the real #(1 2 3)))))
+             (if (< arg1 arg2) arg1 arg2))))
+    => T
+  but when this expression is used as the body of (DEFUN FOO () ...)
+  then (FOO)=>NIL.
+
+195: "confusing reporting of not-a-REAL TYPE-ERRORs from THE REAL"
+  In sbcl-0.7.7.10, (THE REAL #(1 2 3)) signals a type error which
+  prints as "This is not a (OR SINGLE-FLOAT DOUBLE-FLOAT RATIONAL)".
+  The (OR SINGLE-FLOAT DOUBLE-FLOAT RATIONAL) representation of
+  REAL is unnecessarily confusing, especially since it relies on 
+  internal implementation knowledge that even with SHORT-FLOAT
+  and LONG-FLOAT left out of the union, this type is equal to REAL.
+  So it'd be better just to say "This is not a REAL".
 
 DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS
   IR1-#: