then executing
(FOO 1.5)
will cause the INTEGERP case to be selected, giving bogus output a la
- exactly 1.33..
+ exactly 2.5
This violates the "declarations are assertions" principle.
According to the ANSI spec, in the section "System Class FUNCTION",
this is a case of "lying to the compiler", but the lying is done
46:
type safety errors reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
- a: (COERCE (QUOTE (A B C)) (QUOTE (VECTOR * 4)))
- => #(A B C)
- In general lengths of array type specifications aren't
- checked by COERCE, so it fails when the spec is
- (VECTOR 4), (STRING 2), (SIMPLE-BIT-VECTOR 3), or whatever.
- b: CONCATENATE has the same problem of not checking the length
- of specified output array types. MAKE-SEQUENCE and MAP and
- MERGE also have the same problem.
c: (COERCE 'AND 'FUNCTION) returns something related to
(MACRO-FUNCTION 'AND), but ANSI says it should raise an error.
- h: (MAKE-CONCATENATED-STREAM (MAKE-STRING-OUTPUT-STREAM))
- should signal TYPE-ERROR.
- i: MAKE-TWO-WAY-STREAM doesn't check that its arguments can
- be used for input and output as needed. It should fail with
- TYPE-ERROR when handed e.g. the results of
- MAKE-STRING-INPUT-STREAM or MAKE-STRING-OUTPUT-STREAM in
- the inappropriate positions, but doesn't.
k: READ-BYTE is supposed to signal TYPE-ERROR when its argument is
not a binary input stream, but instead cheerfully reads from
character streams, e.g. (MAKE-STRING-INPUT-STREAM "abc").
47:
DEFCLASS bugs reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
- a: (DEFCLASS FOO () (A B A)) should signal a PROGRAM-ERROR, and
- doesn't.
- b: (DEFCLASS FOO () (A B A) (:DEFAULT-INITARGS X A X B)) should
- signal a PROGRAM-ERROR, and doesn't.
- c: (DEFCLASS FOO07 NIL ((A :ALLOCATION :CLASS :ALLOCATION :CLASS))),
- and other DEFCLASS forms with duplicate specifications in their
- slots, should signal a PROGRAM-ERROR, and doesn't.
d: (DEFGENERIC IF (X)) should signal a PROGRAM-ERROR, but instead
causes a COMPILER-ERROR.
-48:
- SYMBOL-MACROLET bugs reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
- c: SYMBOL-MACROLET should signal PROGRAM-ERROR if something
- it binds is declared SPECIAL inside.
-
51:
miscellaneous errors reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
a: (PROGN
(DEFGENERIC FOO03 (X))
(ADD-METHOD (FUNCTION FOO03) M)))
should give an error, but SBCL allows it.
- b: READ should probably return READER-ERROR, not the bare
- arithmetic error, when input a la "1/0" or "1e1000" causes
- an arithmetic error.
52:
It has been reported (e.g. by Peter Van Eynde) that there are
the new output block should start indented 2 or more characters
rightward of the correct location.
-65:
- (probably related to bug #70; maybe related to bug #109)
- As reported by Carl Witty on submit@bugs.debian.org 1999-05-08,
- compiling this file
-(in-package "CL-USER")
-(defun equal-terms (termx termy)
- (labels
- ((alpha-equal-bound-term-lists (listx listy)
- (or (and (null listx) (null listy))
- (and listx listy
- (let ((bindings-x (bindings-of-bound-term (car listx)))
- (bindings-y (bindings-of-bound-term (car listy))))
- (if (and (null bindings-x) (null bindings-y))
- (alpha-equal-terms (term-of-bound-term (car listx))
- (term-of-bound-term (car listy)))
- (and (= (length bindings-x) (length bindings-y))
- (prog2
- (enter-binding-pairs (bindings-of-bound-term (car listx))
- (bindings-of-bound-term (car listy)))
- (alpha-equal-terms (term-of-bound-term (car listx))
- (term-of-bound-term (car listy)))
- (exit-binding-pairs (bindings-of-bound-term (car listx))
- (bindings-of-bound-term (car listy)))))))
- (alpha-equal-bound-term-lists (cdr listx) (cdr listy)))))
-
- (alpha-equal-terms (termx termy)
- (if (and (variable-p termx)
- (variable-p termy))
- (equal-bindings (id-of-variable-term termx)
- (id-of-variable-term termy))
- (and (equal-operators-p (operator-of-term termx) (operator-of-term termy))
- (alpha-equal-bound-term-lists (bound-terms-of-term termx)
- (bound-terms-of-term termy))))))
-
- (or (eq termx termy)
- (and termx termy
- (with-variable-invocation (alpha-equal-terms termx termy))))))
- causes an assertion failure
- The assertion (EQ (C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET C::CALLER)
- (C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET (C::LAMBDA-HOME C::CALLEE))) failed.
-
- Bob Rogers reports (1999-07-28 on cmucl-imp@cons.org) a smaller test
- case with the same problem:
-(defun parse-fssp-alignment ()
- ;; Given an FSSP alignment file named by the argument . . .
- (labels ((get-fssp-char ()
- (get-fssp-char))
- (read-fssp-char ()
- (get-fssp-char)))
- ;; Stub body, enough to tickle the bug.
- (list (read-fssp-char)
- (read-fssp-char))))
-
-66:
- ANSI specifies that the RESULT-TYPE argument of CONCATENATE must be
- a subtype of SEQUENCE, but CONCATENATE doesn't check this properly:
- (CONCATENATE 'SIMPLE-ARRAY #(1 2) '(3)) => #(1 2 3)
- This also leads to funny behavior when derived type specifiers
- are used, as originally reported by Milan Zamazal for CMU CL (on the
- Debian bugs mailing list (?) 2000-02-27), then reported by Martin
- Atzmueller for SBCL (2000-10-01 on sbcl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net):
- (DEFTYPE FOO () 'SIMPLE-ARRAY)
- (CONCATENATE 'FOO #(1 2) '(3))
- => #<ARRAY-TYPE SIMPLE-ARRAY> is a bad type specifier for
- sequence functions.
- The derived type specifier FOO should act the same way as the
- built-in type SIMPLE-ARRAY here, but it doesn't. That problem
- doesn't seem to exist for sequence types:
- (DEFTYPE BAR () 'SIMPLE-VECTOR)
- (CONCATENATE 'BAR #(1 2) '(3)) => #(1 2 3)
- See also bug #46a./b., and discussion and patch sbcl-devel and
- cmucl-imp 2002-07
-
67:
As reported by Winton Davies on a CMU CL mailing list 2000-01-10,
and reported for SBCL by Martin Atzmueller 2000-10-20: (TRACE GETHASH)
crashes SBCL. In general tracing anything which is used in the
implementation of TRACE is likely to have the same problem.
-70:
- (probably related to bug #65; maybe related to bug #109)
- The compiler doesn't like &OPTIONAL arguments in LABELS and FLET
- forms. E.g.
- (DEFUN FIND-BEFORE (ITEM SEQUENCE &KEY (TEST #'EQL))
- (LABELS ((FIND-ITEM (OBJ SEQ TEST &OPTIONAL (VAL NIL))
- (LET ((ITEM (FIRST SEQ)))
- (COND ((NULL SEQ)
- (VALUES NIL NIL))
- ((FUNCALL TEST OBJ ITEM)
- (VALUES VAL SEQ))
- (T
- (FIND-ITEM OBJ (REST SEQ) TEST (NCONC VAL `(,ITEM))))))))
- (FIND-ITEM ITEM SEQUENCE TEST)))
- from David Young's bug report on cmucl-help@cons.org 30 Nov 2000
- causes sbcl-0.6.9 to fail with
- error in function SB-KERNEL:ASSERT-ERROR:
- The assertion (EQ (SB-C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET SB-C::CALLER)
- (SB-C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET
- (SB-C::LAMBDA-HOME SB-C::CALLEE))) failed.
-
72:
(DECLAIM (OPTIMIZE ..)) doesn't work properly inside LOCALLY forms.
(I haven't tried to investigate this bug enough to guess whether
there might be any user-level symptoms.)
+ In fact, the type system is likely to depend on this inequality not
+ holding... * is not equivalent to T in many cases, such as
+ (VECTOR *) /= (VECTOR T).
+
94a:
Inconsistencies between derived and declared VALUES return types for
DEFUN aren't checked very well. E.g. the logic which successfully
time trying to GC afterwards. Surely there's some more economical
way to implement (ROOM T).
-109:
- reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
- collection:
- ;;; This file fails to compile.
- ;;; Maybe this bug is related to bugs #65, #70 in the BUGS file.
- (in-package :cl-user)
- (defun tst2 ()
- (labels
- ((eff (&key trouble)
- (eff)
- ;; nil
- ;; Uncomment and it works
- ))
- (eff)))
- In SBCL 0.6.12.42, the problem is
- internal error, failed AVER:
- "(COMMON-LISP:EQ (SB!C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET SB!C::CALLER)
- (SB!C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET (SB!C::LAMBDA-HOME SB!C::CALLEE)))"
-
-110:
- reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
- collection:
- ;;; The compiler is flushing the argument type test, and the default
- ;;; case in the cond, so that calling with say a fixnum 0 causes a
- ;;; SIGBUS.
- (declaim (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
- (defun tst (x)
- (declare (type (or string stream) x))
- (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
- ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
- (t
- 'none)))
- The symptom in sbcl-0.6.12.42 on OpenBSD is actually (TST 0)=>STREAM
- (not the SIGBUS reported in the comment) but that's broken too;
- type declarations are supposed to be treated as assertions unless
- SAFETY 0, so we should be getting a TYPE-ERROR.
-
-113:
- reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
- collection:
- (in-package :cl-user)
- ;;; From: David Gadbois <gadbois@cyc.com>
- ;;;
- ;;; Logical pathnames aren't externalizable.
- ;;; Test case:
- (let ((tempfile "/tmp/test.lisp"))
- (setf (logical-pathname-translations "XXX")
- '(("XXX:**;*.*" "/tmp/**/*.*")))
- (with-open-file (out tempfile :direction :output)
- (write-string "(defvar *path* #P\"XXX:XXX;FOO.LISP\")" out))
- (compile-file tempfile))
- The error message in sbcl-0.6.12.42 is
- ; caught ERROR:
- ; (while making load form for #<SB-IMPL::LOGICAL-HOST "XXX">)
- ; A logical host can't be dumped as a constant: #<SB-IMPL::LOGICAL-HOST "XXX">
-
115:
reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
collection:
Raymond Toy comments that this is tricky on the X86 since its FPU
uses 80-bit precision internally.
-120a:
- The compiler incorrectly figures the return type of
- (DEFUN FOO (FRAME UP-FRAME)
- (IF (OR (NOT FRAME)
- T)
- FRAME
- "BAR"))
- as NIL.
-
- This problem exists in CMU CL 18c too. When I reported it on
- cmucl-imp@cons.org, Raymond Toy replied 23 Aug 2001 with
- a partial explanation, but no fix has been found yet.
-
120b:
Even in sbcl-0.pre7.x, which is supposed to be free of the old
non-ANSI behavior of treating the function return type inferred
(IF (NOT (IGNORE-ERRORS ..))). E.g.
(defun foo1i ()
(if (not (ignore-errors
- (make-pathname :host "foo" :directory "!bla" :name "bar")))
+ (make-pathname :host "foo"
+ :directory "!bla"
+ :name "bar")))
(print "ok")
(error "notunlessnot")))
The (NOT (IGNORE-ERRORS ..)) form evaluates to T, so this should be
#+NIL) and I'd like to go back to see whether this really is
a compiler bug before I delete this BUGS entry.
-123:
- The *USE-IMPLEMENTATION-TYPES* hack causes bugs, particularly
- (IN-PACKAGE :SB-KERNEL)
- (TYPE= (SPECIFIER-TYPE '(VECTOR T))
- (SPECIFIER-TYPE '(VECTOR UNDEFTYPE)))
- Then because of this, the compiler bogusly optimizes
- (TYPEP #(11) '(SIMPLE-ARRAY UNDEF-TYPE 1))
- to T. Unfortunately, just setting *USE-IMPLEMENTATION-TYPES* to
- NIL around sbcl-0.pre7.14.flaky4.12 didn't work: the compiler complained
- about type mismatches (probably harmlessly, another instance of bug 117);
- and then cold init died with a segmentation fault.
-
124:
As of version 0.pre7.14, SBCL's implementation of MACROLET makes
the entire lexical environment at the point of MACROLET available
- in the bodies of the macroexpander functions. In particular, it
- allows the function bodies (which run at compile time) to try to
+ in the bodies of the macroexpander functions. In particular, it
+ allows the function bodies (which run at compile time) to try to
access lexical variables (which are only defined at runtime).
It doesn't even issue a warning, which is bad.
-
+
The SBCL behavior arguably conforms to the ANSI spec (since the
spec says that the behavior is undefined, ergo anything conforms).
However, it would be better to issue a compile-time error.
the local macro definitions in a MACROLET, but the consequences
are undefined if the local macro definitions reference any
local variable or function bindings that are visible in that
- lexical environment.
+ lexical environment.
Then it seems to contradict itself by giving the example
(defun foo (x flag)
(macrolet ((fudge (z)
but actual specification quoted above says that the actual behavior
is undefined.
+ (Since 0.7.8.23 macroexpanders are defined in a restricted version
+ of the lexical environment, containing no lexical variables and
+ functions, which seems to conform to ANSI and CLtL2, but signalling
+ a STYLE-WARNING for references to variables similar to locals might
+ be a good thing.)
+
125:
(as reported by Gabe Garza on cmucl-help 2001-09-21)
(defvar *tmp* 3)
structure classes related by inheritance. As of 0.7.0, SBCL still
doesn't follow it.
-129:
- insufficient syntax checking in MACROLET:
- (defun foo (x)
- (macrolet ((defmacro bar (z) `(+ z z)))
- (bar x)))
- shouldn't compile without error (because of the extra DEFMACRO symbol).
-
-131:
- As of sbcl-0.pre7.86.flaky7.3, the cross-compiler, and probably
- the CL:COMPILE function (which is based on the same %COMPILE
- mechanism) get confused by
-(defun sxhash (x)
- (labels ((sxhash-number (x)
- (etypecase x
- (fixnum (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (integer (sb!bignum:sxhash-bignum x))
- (single-float (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (double-float (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- #!+long-float (long-float (error "stub: no LONG-FLOAT"))
- (ratio (let ((result 127810327))
- (declare (type fixnum result))
- (mixf result (sxhash-number (numerator x)))
- (mixf result (sxhash-number (denominator x)))
- result))
- (complex (let ((result 535698211))
- (declare (type fixnum result))
- (mixf result (sxhash-number (realpart x)))
- (mixf result (sxhash-number (imagpart x)))
- result))))
- (sxhash-recurse (x &optional (depthoid +max-hash-depthoid+))
- (declare (type index depthoid))
- (typecase x
- (list
- (if (plusp depthoid)
- (mix (sxhash-recurse (car x) (1- depthoid))
- (sxhash-recurse (cdr x) (1- depthoid)))
- 261835505))
- (instance
- (if (typep x 'structure-object)
- (logxor 422371266
- (sxhash ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (class-name (layout-class (%instance-layout x)))))
- 309518995))
- (symbol (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (number (sxhash-number x))
- (array
- (typecase x
- (simple-string (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (string (%sxhash-substring x))
- (bit-vector (let ((result 410823708))
- (declare (type fixnum result))
- (dotimes (i (min depthoid (length x)))
- (mixf result (aref x i)))
- result))
- (t (logxor 191020317 (sxhash (array-rank x))))))
- (character
- (logxor 72185131
- (sxhash (char-code x)))) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
- (t 42))))
- (sxhash-recurse x)))
- complaining "function called with two arguments, but wants exactly
- one" about SXHASH-RECURSE. (This might not be strictly a new bug,
- since IIRC post-fork CMU CL has also had problems with &OPTIONAL
- arguments in FLET/LABELS: it might be an old Python bug which is
- only exercised by the new arrangement of the SBCL compiler.)
-
135:
Ideally, uninterning a symbol would allow it, and its associated
- FDEFINITION and PROCLAIM data, to be reclaimed by the GC. However,
+ FDEFINITION and PROCLAIM data, to be reclaimed by the GC. However,
at least as of sbcl-0.7.0, this isn't the case. Information about
FDEFINITIONs and PROCLAIMed properties is stored in globaldb.lisp
essentially in ordinary (non-weak) hash tables keyed by symbols.
Thus, once a system has an entry in this system, it tends to live
forever, even when it is uninterned and all other references to it
- are lost.
+ are lost.
136:
(reported by Arnaud Rouanet on cmucl-imp 2001-12-18)
T
* (defclass b () ())
#<STANDARD-CLASS B>
-
+
;;; And now...
* (subtypep 'b 'a)
T
This bug was fixed in sbcl-0.7.4.1 by invalidating the PCL wrapper
class upon redefinition. Unfortunately, doing so causes bug #176 to
- appear. Pending further investication, one or other of these bugs
+ appear. Pending further investigation, one or other of these bugs
might be present at any given time.
141:
* (lisp-implementation-version)
"0.pre7.129"
-142:
- (as reported by Lynn Quam on cmucl-imp ca. 2002-01-16)
- %NATURALIZE-C-STRING conses a lot, like 16 bytes per byte
- of the naturalized string. We could probably port the patches
- from the cmucl-imp mailing list.
-
143:
(reported by Jesse Bouwman 2001-10-24 through the unfortunately
prominent SourceForge web/db bug tracking system, which is
debugger invoked on condition of type TYPE-ERROR:
The value NIL is not of type SB-C::NODE.
The location of this failure has moved around as various related
- issues were cleaned up. As of sbcl-0.7.1.9, it occurs in
+ issues were cleaned up. As of sbcl-0.7.1.9, it occurs in
NODE-BLOCK called by LAMBDA-COMPONENT called by IR2-CONVERT-CLOSURE.
-153:
- (essentially the same problem as a CMU CL bug reported by Martin
- Cracauer on cmucl-imp 2002-02-19)
- There is a hole in structure slot type checking. Compiling and LOADing
- (declaim (optimize safety))
- (defstruct foo
- (bla 0 :type fixnum))
- (defun f ()
- (let ((foo (make-foo)))
- (setf (foo-bla foo) '(1 . 1))
- (format t "Is ~a of type ~a a cons? => ~a~%"
- (foo-bla foo)
- (type-of (foo-bla foo))
- (consp (foo-bla foo)))))
- (f)
- should signal an error, but in sbcl-0.7.1.21 instead gives the output
- Is (1 . 1) of type CONS a cons? => NIL
- without signalling an error.
+ (Python LET-converts KIDIFY1 into KID-FROB, then tries to inline
+ expand KID-FROB into %ZEEP. Having partially done it, it sees a call
+ of KIDIFY1, which already does not exist. So it gives up on
+ expansion, leaving garbage consisting of infinished blocks of the
+ partially converted function.)
157:
Functions SUBTYPEP, TYPEP, UPGRADED-ARRAY-ELEMENT-TYPE, and
isn't too surprising since there are many differences in stack
implementation and GC conservatism between the X86 and other ports.)
-165:
- Array types with element-types of some unknown type are falsely being
- assumed to be of type (ARRAY T) by the compiler in some cases. The
- following code demonstrates the problem:
-
- (defun foo (x)
- (declare (type (vector bar) x))
- (aref x 1))
- (deftype bar () 'single-float)
- (foo (make-array 3 :element-type 'bar))
- -> TYPE-ERROR "The value #(0.0 0.0 0.0) is not of type (VECTOR BAR)."
- (typep (make-array 3 :element-type 'bar) '(vector bar))
- -> T
-
- The easy solution is to make the functions which depend on knowing
- the upgraded-array-element-type (in compiler/array-tran and
- compiler/generic/vm-tran as of sbcl-0.7.3.x) be slightly smarter about
- unknown types; an alternative is to have the
- specialized-element-type slot in the ARRAY-TYPE structure be
- *WILD-TYPE* for UNKNOWN-TYPE element types.
-
166:
Compiling
(in-package :cl-user)
macro is unhappy with the illegal syntax in the method body, and
is giving an unclear error message.
-168:
- (reported by Dan Barlow on sbcl-devel 2002-05-10)
- In sbcl-0.7.3.12, doing
- (defstruct foo bar baz)
- (compile nil (lambda (x) (or x (foo-baz x))))
- gives an error
- debugger invoked on condition of type SB-INT:BUG:
- full call to SB-KERNEL:%INSTANCE-REF
- This is probably a bug in SBCL itself. [...]
- Since this is a reasonable user error, it shouldn't be reported as
- an SBCL bug.
-
-171:
- (reported by Pierre Mai while investigating bug 47):
- (DEFCLASS FOO () ((A :SILLY T)))
- signals a SIMPLE-ERROR, not a PROGRAM-ERROR.
-
172:
sbcl's treatment of at least macro lambda lists is too permissive;
e.g., in sbcl-0.7.3.7:
code. Since then the warning has been downgraded to STYLE-WARNING,
so it's still a bug but at least it's a little less annoying.
-174:
- The error message from attempting to use a #\Return format
- directive:
- (format nil "~^M") ; replace "^M" with a literal #\Return
- debugger invoked on condition of type SB-FORMAT::FORMAT-ERROR:
- error in format: unknown format directive
- ~
- ^
- is not terribly helpful; this is more noticeable than parallel cases
- with e.g. #\Backspace because of the differing newline conventions
- on various operating systems. (reported by Harald Hanche-Olsen on
- cmucl-help 2002-05-31)
-
176:
reported by Alexey Dejneka 08 Jun 2002 in sbcl-devel:
Playing with McCLIM, I've received an error "Unbound variable WRAPPER
In sbcl-0.7.4.24, compiling
(defun bug178 (x)
(funcall (the function (the standard-object x))))
- gives
+ gives
failed AVER:
"(AND (EQ (IR2-CONTINUATION-PRIMITIVE-TYPE 2CONT) FUNCTION-PTYPE) (EQ CHECK T))"
This variant compiles OK, though:
(defun bug178alternative (x)
(funcall (the nil x)))
-181: "bad type specifier drops compiler into debugger"
- Compiling
- (in-package :cl-user)
- (defun bar (x)
- (declare (type 0 x))
- (cons x x))
- signals
- bad thing to be a type specifier: 0
- which seems fine, but also enters the debugger (instead of having
- the compiler handle the error, convert it into a COMPILER-ERROR, and
- continue compiling) which seems wrong.
+ (since 0.7.8.9 it does not signal an error; see also bug 199)
183: "IEEE floating point issues"
Even where floating point handling is being dealt with relatively
only sporadically reproducible.
191: "Miscellaneous PCL deficiencies"
- (reported by Alexey Dejenka sbcl-devel 2002-08-04)
+ (reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-08-04)
a. DEFCLASS does not inform the compiler about generated
functions. Compiling a file with
(DEFCLASS A-CLASS ()
results in a STYLE-WARNING:
undefined-function
SB-SLOT-ACCESSOR-NAME::|COMMON-LISP-USER A-CLASS-X slot READER|
+
+ APD's fix for this was checked in to sbcl-0.7.6.20, but Pierre
+ Mai points out that the declamation of functions is in fact
+ incorrect in some cases (most notably for structure
+ classes). This means that at present erroneous attempts to use
+ WITH-SLOTS and the like on classes with metaclass STRUCTURE-CLASS
+ won't get the corresponding STYLE-WARNING.
c. the examples in CLHS 7.6.5.1 (regarding generic function lambda
lists and &KEY arguments) do not signal errors when they should.
+192: "Python treats free type declarations as promises."
+ b. What seemed like the same fundamental problem as bug 192a, but
+ was not fixed by the same (APD "more strict type checking
+ sbcl-devel 2002-08-97) patch:
+ (DOTIMES (I ...) (DOTIMES (J ...) (DECLARE ...) ...)):
+ (declaim (optimize (speed 1) (safety 3)))
+ (defun trust-assertion (i)
+ (dotimes (j i)
+ (declare (type (mod 4) i)) ; when commented out, behavior changes!
+ (unless (< i 5)
+ (print j))))
+ (trust-assertion 6) ; prints nothing unless DECLARE is commented out
+
+ (see bug 203)
+
+193: "unhelpful CLOS error reporting when the primary method is missing"
+ In sbcl-0.7.7, when
+ (defmethod foo :before ((x t)) (print x))
+ is the only method defined on FOO, the error reporting when e.g.
+ (foo 12)
+ is relatively unhelpful:
+ There is no primary method for the generic function
+ #<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION FOO (1)>.
+ with the offending argument nowhere visible in the backtrace. This
+ continues even if there *are* primary methods, just not for the
+ specified arg type, e.g.
+ (defmethod foo ((x character)) (print x))
+ (defmethod foo ((x string)) (print x))
+ (defmethod foo ((x pathname)) ...)
+ In that case it could be very helpful to know what argument value is
+ falling through the cracks of the defined primary methods, but the
+ error message stays the same (even BACKTRACE doesn't tell you what the
+ bad argument value is).
+
+194: "no error from (THE REAL '(1 2 3)) in some cases"
+ fixed parts:
+ a. In sbcl-0.7.7.9,
+ (multiple-value-prog1 (progn (the real '(1 2 3))))
+ returns (1 2 3) instead of signalling an error. This was fixed by
+ APD's "more strict type checking patch", but although the fixed
+ code (in sbcl-0.7.7.19) works (signals TYPE-ERROR) interactively,
+ it's difficult to write a regression test for it, because
+ (IGNORE-ERRORS (MULTIPLE-VALUE-PROG1 (PROGN (THE REAL '(1 2 3)))))
+ still returns (1 2 3).
+ still-broken parts:
+ b. (IGNORE-ERRORS (MULTIPLE-VALUE-PROG1 (PROGN (THE REAL '(1 2 3)))))
+ returns (1 2 3). (As above, this shows up when writing regression
+ tests for fixed-ness of part a.)
+ c. Also in sbcl-0.7.7.9, (IGNORE-ERRORS (THE REAL '(1 2 3))) => (1 2 3).
+ d. At the REPL,
+ (null (ignore-errors
+ (let ((arg1 1)
+ (arg2 (identity (the real #(1 2 3)))))
+ (if (< arg1 arg2) arg1 arg2))))
+ => T
+ but putting the same expression inside (DEFUN FOO () ...),
+ (FOO) => NIL.
+ notes:
+ * Actually this entry is probably multiple bugs, as
+ Alexey Dejneka commented on sbcl-devel 2002-09-03:)
+ I don't think that placing these two bugs in one entry is
+ a good idea: they have different explanations. The second
+ (min 1 nil) is caused by flushing of unused code--IDENTITY
+ can do nothing with it. So it is really bug 122. The first
+ (min nil) is due to M-V-PROG1: substituting a continuation
+ for the result, it forgets about type assertion. The purpose
+ of IDENTITY is to save the restricted continuation from
+ inaccurate transformations.
+ * Alexey Dejneka pointed out that
+ (IGNORE-ERRORS (IDENTITY (THE REAL '(1 2 3))))
+ works as it should. Also
+ (IGNORE-ERRORS (VALUES (THE REAL '(1 2 3))))
+ works as it should. Perhaps this is another case of VALUES type
+ intersections behaving in non-useful ways?
+
+199: "hairy FUNCTION types confuse the compiler"
+ (reported by APD sbcl-devel 2002-09-15)
+ (DEFUN MUR (F)
+ (EQ NIL (FUNCALL F)))
+
+ (DEFUN FOO (F X)
+ (DECLARE (TYPE (AND FUNCTION (SATISFIES MUR)) F))
+ (FUNCALL F X))
+
+ fails to compile, printing
+ failed AVER:
+ "(AND (EQ (IR2-CONTINUATION-PRIMITIVE-TYPE 2CONT) FUNCTION-PTYPE) (EQ CHECK T))"
+
+ APD further reports that this bug is not present in CMUCL.
+
+ (this case was fixed in 0.7.8.9; see also bug 178)
+
+201: "Incautious type inference from compound CONS types"
+ (reported by APD sbcl-devel 2002-09-17)
+ (DEFUN FOO (X)
+ (LET ((Y (CAR (THE (CONS INTEGER *) X))))
+ (SETF (CAR X) NIL)
+ (FORMAT NIL "~S IS ~S, Y = ~S"
+ (CAR X)
+ (TYPECASE (CAR X)
+ (INTEGER 'INTEGER)
+ (T '(NOT INTEGER)))
+ Y)))
+
+ (FOO ' (1 . 2)) => "NIL IS INTEGER, Y = 1"
+
+203:
+ Compiler does not check THEs on unused values, e.g. in
+
+ (progn (the real (list 1)) t)
+
+ This situation may appear during optimizing away degenerate cases of
+ certain functions: see bugs 54, 192b.
+
+205: "environment issues in cross compiler"
+ (These bugs have no impact on user code, but should be fixed or
+ documented.)
+ a. Macroexpanders introduced with MACROLET are defined in the null
+ lexical environment.
+ b. The body of (EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL) ...) is evaluated in
+ the null lexical environment.
+
+206: ":SB-FLUID feature broken"
+ (reported by Antonio Martinez-Shotton sbcl-devel 2002-10-07)
+ Enabling :SB-FLUID in the target-features list in sbcl-0.7.8 breaks
+ the build.
+
+207: "poorly distributed SXHASH results for compound data"
+ SBCL's SXHASH could probably try a little harder. ANSI: "the
+ intent is that an implementation should make a good-faith
+ effort to produce hash-codes that are well distributed
+ within the range of non-negative fixnums". But
+ (let ((hits (make-hash-table)))
+ (dotimes (i 16)
+ (dotimes (j 16)
+ (let* ((ij (cons i j))
+ (newlist (push ij (gethash (sxhash ij) hits))))
+ (when (cdr newlist)
+ (format t "~&collision: ~S~%" newlist))))))
+ reports lots of collisions in sbcl-0.7.8. A stronger MIX function
+ would be an obvious way of fix. Maybe it would be acceptably efficient
+ to redo MIX using a lookup into a 256-entry s-box containing
+ 29-bit pseudorandom numbers?
+
+208: "package confusion in PCL handling of structure slot handlers"
+ In sbcl-0.7.8 compiling and loading
+ (in-package :cl)
+ (defstruct foo (slot (error "missing")) :type list :read-only t)
+ (defmethod print-object ((foo foo) stream) (print nil stream))
+ causes CERROR "attempting to modify a symbol in the COMMON-LISP
+ package: FOO-SLOT". (This is fairly bad code, but still it's hard
+ to see that it should cause symbols to be interned in the CL package.)
+
+209: "DOCUMENTATION generic function has wrong argument precedence order"
+ The method from
+ (DEFMETHOD DOCUMENTATION ((X (EQL '+)) Y) "WRONG!")
+ should not be executed in the call
+ (DOCUMENTATION '+ 'FUNCTION),
+ as the DOCUMENTATION generic function has a different argument
+ precedence order (see its entry in the CLHS). However, despite a
+ correct generic function definition in the PCL source code, SBCL
+ returns "WRONG!" for the call.
DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS
IR1-#:
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff