an error may be signalled at read time and it would be good if
SBCL did it.
- c: Reading of not initialized slot sometimes causes SEGV (for inline
- accessors it is fixed, but out-of-line still do not perform type
- check).
-
- d:
- (declaim (optimize (safety 3) (speed 1) (space 1)))
- (defstruct foo
- x y)
- (defstruct (stringwise-foo (:include foo
- (x "x" :type simple-string)
- (y "y" :type simple-string))))
- (defparameter *stringwise-foo*
- (make-stringwise-foo))
- (setf (foo-x *stringwise-foo*) 0)
- (defun frob-stringwise-foo (sf)
- (aref (stringwise-foo-x sf) 0))
- (frob-stringwise-foo *stringwise-foo*)
- SEGV.
+ d: (fixed in 0.8.1.5)
7:
The "compiling top-level form:" output ought to be condensed.
See also bugs #45.c and #183
-148:
- COMPILE-FILE on the file
- (defun u-b-sra (ad0)
- (declare (special *foo* *bar*))
- (declare (optimize (safety 3) (speed 2) (space 1)))
- (labels ((c.frob ())
- (ad.frob (ad)
- (if *foo*
- (mapc #'ad.frob *bar*)
- (dolist (b *bar*)
- (c.frob)))))
- (declare (inline c.frob ad.frob))
- (ad.frob ad0)))
- fails with
- debugger invoked on condition of type TYPE-ERROR:
- The value NIL is not of type SB-C::NODE.
-
- (Python LET-converts C.FROB into AD.FROB, then tries to inline
- expand AD.FROB. Having partially done it, it sees a call of C.FROB,
- which already does not exist. So it gives up on expansion, leaving
- garbage consisting of infinished blocks of the partially converted
- function.)
-
162:
(reported by Robert E. Brown 2002-04-16)
When a function is called with too few arguments, causing the
array types, there's no good way to tell it you're doing it
intentionally so that it should shut up and just compile the code.
- Another poblem is confusing error message "asserted type ARRAY
+ Another problem is confusing error message "asserted type ARRAY
conflicts with derived type (VALUES SIMPLE-VECTOR &OPTIONAL)" during
compiling (LAMBDA (V) (VALUES (SVREF V 0) (VECTOR-POP V))).
currently checks for complex arrays seem to be performed by
callees.)
+258:
+ (fixed in 0.8.1.3)
+
+259:
+ (compile nil '(lambda () (aref (make-array 0) 0))) compiles without
+ warning. Analogous cases with the index and length being equal and
+ greater than 0 are warned for; the problem here seems to be that the
+ type required for an array reference of this type is (INTEGER 0 (0))
+ which is canonicalized to NIL.
+
DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS
IR1-#:
These labels were used for bugs related to the old IR1 interpreter.