0.8.2.55:

[sbcl.git] / BUGS

diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS
index ed452a7..84357b1 100644 (file)
--- a/BUGS
+++ b/BUGS
@@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ WORKAROUND:
   it took more than two minutes (but less than five) for me.
 
 145:
+  a.
   ANSI allows types `(COMPLEX ,FOO) to use very hairy values for
   FOO, e.g. (COMPLEX (AND REAL (SATISFIES ODDP))). The old CMU CL
   COMPLEX implementation didn't deal with this, and hasn't been
@@ -497,6 +498,18 @@ WORKAROUND:
   conformance problem, since seems hard to construct useful code
   where it matters.)
 
+  b.
+  * (defun foo (x)
+      (declare (type (double-float -0d0) x))
+      (declare (optimize speed))
+      (+ x (sqrt (log (random 1d0)))))
+  debugger invoked on condition of type SIMPLE-ERROR:
+    bad thing to be a type specifier: ((COMPLEX
+                                        (DOUBLE-FLOAT 0.0d0
+                                                      #.SB-EXT:DOUBLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY))
+                                       #C(0.0d0 #.SB-EXT:DOUBLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY)
+                                       #C(0.0d0 #.SB-EXT:DOUBLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY))
+
 146:
   Floating point errors are reported poorly. E.g. on x86 OpenBSD
   with sbcl-0.7.1, 
@@ -1079,7 +1092,19 @@ WORKAROUND:
       (declare (type (integer 0 #.large-constant) n))
       (expt 1/10 n))
 
-  (fixed in 0.8.2.51)
+  (fixed in 0.8.2.51, but a test case would be good)
+
+276:
+    (defmethod fee ((x fixnum))
+      (setq x (/ x 2))
+      x)
+    (fee 1) => type error
+
+  (taken from CLOCC)
+
+277:
+  IGNORE/IGNORABLE declarations should be acceptable for symbol
+  macros.
 
 
 DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS