d: (fixed in 0.8.1.5)
-27:
- Sometimes (SB-EXT:QUIT) fails with
- Argh! maximum interrupt nesting depth (4096) exceeded, exiting
- Process inferior-lisp exited abnormally with code 1
- I haven't noticed a repeatable case of this yet.
-
33:
And as long as we're wishing, it would be awfully nice if INSPECT could
also report on closures, telling about the values of the bound variables.
e-mail on cmucl-help@cons.org on 2001-01-16 and 2001-01-17 from WHN
and Pierre Mai.)
+ (Actually this has changed changed since, and types as above are
+ now supported. This may be a bug.)
+
83:
RANDOM-INTEGER-EXTRA-BITS=10 may not be large enough for the RANDOM
RNG to be high quality near RANDOM-FIXNUM-MAX; it looks as though
a. (lambda () (svref (make-array 8 :adjustable t) 1))
- b. (lambda (x)
- (list (let ((y (the real x)))
- (unless (floatp y) (error ""))
- y)
- (integer-length x)))
+ b. (fixed at some point before 1.0.4.10)
c. (lambda (x)
(declare (optimize (debug 0)))
tries to find and remove a method with an incompatible lambda list
from the unrelated generic function.
-381: incautious calls to EQUAL in fasl dumping
- Compiling
- (frob #(#1=(a #1#)))
- (frob #(#1=(b #1#)))
- (frob #(#1=(a #1#)))
- in sbcl-0.9.0 causes CONTROL-STACK-EXHAUSTED. My (WHN) impression
- is that this follows from the use of (MAKE-HASH-TABLE :TEST 'EQUAL)
- to detect sharing, in which case fixing it might require either
- getting less ambitious about detecting shared list structure, or
- implementing the moral equivalent of EQUAL hash tables in a
- cycle-tolerant way.
-
382: externalization unexpectedly changes array simplicity
COMPILE-FILE and LOAD
(defun foo ()
implementation of read circularity, using a symbol as a marker for
the previously-referenced object.
-411: NAN issues on x86-64
- Test :NAN-COMPARISONS in float.pure.lisp fails on x86-64, and has been
- disabled on those platforms. Since x86 does not exhibit any problems
- the problem is probably with the new FP implementation.
+413: type-errors in ROOM
+
+ (defvar *a* (make-array (expt 2 27)))
+ (room)
+
+ Causes a type-error on 32bit SBCL, as various byte-counts in ROOM
+ implementation overrun fixnums.
+
+ This was fixed in 1.0.4.89, but the patch was reverted as it caused
+ ROOM to cons sufficiently to make running it in a loop deadly on
+ GENCGC: newly allocated objects survived to generation 1, where next
+ call to ROOM would see them, and allocate even more...
+
+ Reported by Faré Rideau on sbcl-devel.
+
+414: strange DISASSEMBLE warning
+
+ Compiling and disassembling
+
+ (defun disassemble-source-form-bug (x y z)
+ (declare (optimize debug))
+ (list x y z))
+
+ Gives
+
+ WARNING: bogus form-number in form! The source file has probably
+ been changed too much to cope with.
+
+415: Issues creating large arrays on x86-64/Linux and x86/Darwin
+
+ (make-array (1- array-dimension-limit))
+
+ causes a GC invariant violation on x86-64/Linux, and
+ an unhandled SIGILL on x86/Darwin.
+
+416: backtrace confusion
+
+ (defun foo (x)
+ (let ((v "foo"))
+ (flet ((bar (z)
+ (oops v z)
+ (oops z v)))
+ (bar x)
+ (bar v))))
+ (foo 13)
+
+ gives the correct error, but the backtrace shows
+ 1: (SB-KERNEL:FDEFINITION-OBJECT 13 NIL)
+ as the second frame.
+
+417: Toplevel NIL expressions mess up unreachable code reporting.
+ In sbcl-1.0.10.7, COMPILE-FILE on the file
+ nil
+ (defmethod frob ((package package) stream)
+ (if (string= (package-name package) "FOO")
+ (pprint-logical-block (stream nil))
+ (print-unreadable-object (package stream))))
+ causes complaints like
+ ; in: SOME SB-C::STRANGE SB-C::PLACE
+ ; (SB-C::UNABLE SB-C::TO SB-C::LOCATE SB-C::SOURCE)
+ ;
+ ; note: deleting unreachable code
+ ;
+ ; note: deleting unreachable code
+ Deleting the toplevel NIL, or even replacing it with 3,
+ causes the system not to complain.
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff