1.0.11.34: better SUBSEQ on lists

[sbcl.git] / BUGS

diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS
index 9e778d1..a375a31 100644 (file)
--- a/BUGS
+++ b/BUGS
@@ -1854,3 +1854,11 @@ WORKAROUND:
                ; note: deleting unreachable code
        Deleting the toplevel NIL, or even replacing it with 3,
        causes the system not to complain.
+
+418: SUBSEQ on lists doesn't support bignum indexes
+
+ LIST-SUBSEQ* now has all the works necessary to support bignum indexes,
+ but it needs to be verified that changing the DEFKNOWN doesn't kill
+ performance elsewhere.
+
+ Other generic sequence functions have this problem as well.