Perhaps any number of such consecutive lines ought to turn into a
single "compiling top-level forms:" line.
-11:
- It would be nice if the
- caught ERROR:
- (during macroexpansion)
- said what macroexpansion was at fault, e.g.
- caught ERROR:
- (during macroexpansion of IN-PACKAGE,
- during macroexpansion of DEFFOO)
-
19:
(I *think* this is a bug. It certainly seems like strange behavior. But
the ANSI spec is scary, dark, and deep.. -- WHN)
; compilation unit finished
; printed 1 note
-241: "DEFCLASS mysteriously remembers uninterned accessor names."
- (from tonyms on #lisp IRC 2003-02-25)
- In sbcl-0.7.12.55, typing
- (defclass foo () ((bar :accessor foo-bar)))
- (profile foo-bar)
- (unintern 'foo-bar)
- (defclass foo () ((bar :accessor foo-bar)))
- gives the error message
- "#:FOO-BAR already names an ordinary function or a macro."
- So it's somehow checking the uninterned old accessor name instead
- of the new requested accessor name, which seems broken to me (WHN).
-
242: "WRITE-SEQUENCE suboptimality"
(observed from clx performance)
In sbcl-0.7.13, WRITE-SEQUENCE of a sequence of type
Expected: (2 6 15 38)
Got: ERROR
-315: "no bounds check for access to displaced array"
- reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
- test suite.
- (locally (declare (optimize (safety 3) (speed 0)))
- (let* ((x (make-array 10 :fill-pointer 4 :element-type 'character
- :initial-element #\space :adjustable t))
- (y (make-array 10 :fill-pointer 4 :element-type 'character
- :displaced-to x)))
- (adjust-array x '(5))
- (char y 5)))
-
- SBCL 0.8.10 elides the bounds check somewhere along the line, and
- returns #\Nul (where an error would be much preferable, since a test
- of that form but with (setf (char y 5) #\Space) potentially corrupts
- the heap and certainly confuses the world if that string is used by
- C code.
-
317: "FORMAT of floating point numbers"
reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
test suite.
up the special variable binding semantics using UNWIND-PROTECT and
(2) it might be sort of a pain to test that no other bugs had been
introduced.
+
+328: "Profiling generic functions", transplanted from #241
+ (from tonyms on #lisp IRC 2003-02-25)
+ In sbcl-0.7.12.55, typing
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :accessor foo-bar)))
+ (profile foo-bar)
+ (unintern 'foo-bar)
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :accessor foo-bar)))
+ gives the error message
+ "#:FOO-BAR already names an ordinary function or a macro."
+
+ Problem: when a generic function is profiled, it appears as an ordinary
+ function to PCL. (Remembering the uninterned accessor is OK, as the
+ redefinition must be able to remove old accessors from their generic
+ functions.)
+
+329: "Sequential class redefinition"
+ reported by Bruno Haible:
+ (defclass reactor () ((max-temp :initform 10000000)))
+ (defvar *r1* (make-instance 'reactor))
+ (defvar *r2* (make-instance 'reactor))
+ (slot-value *r1* 'max-temp)
+ (slot-value *r2* 'max-temp)
+ (defclass reactor () ((uptime :initform 0)))
+ (slot-value *r1* 'uptime)
+ (defclass reactor () ((uptime :initform 0) (max-temp :initform 10000)))
+ (slot-value *r1* 'max-temp) ; => 10000
+ (slot-value *r2* 'max-temp) ; => 10000000 oops...
+
+ Possible solution:
+ The method effective when the wrapper is obsoleted can be saved
+ in the wrapper, and then to update the instance just run through
+ all the old wrappers in order from oldest to newest.
+
+331: "lazy creation of CLOS classes for user-defined conditions"
+ (defstruct foo)
+ (defstruct (bar (:include foo)))
+ (sb-mop:class-direct-subclasses (find-class 'foo))
+ returns NIL, rather than a singleton list containing the BAR class.
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff