d: (fixed in 0.8.1.5)
-7:
- The "compiling top-level form:" output ought to be condensed.
- Perhaps any number of such consecutive lines ought to turn into a
- single "compiling top-level forms:" line.
-
-19:
- (I *think* this is a bug. It certainly seems like strange behavior. But
- the ANSI spec is scary, dark, and deep.. -- WHN)
- (FORMAT NIL "~,1G" 1.4) => "1. "
- (FORMAT NIL "~3,1G" 1.4) => "1. "
-
27:
Sometimes (SB-EXT:QUIT) fails with
Argh! maximum interrupt nesting depth (4096) exceeded, exiting
Process inferior-lisp exited abnormally with code 1
I haven't noticed a repeatable case of this yet.
-32:
- The printer doesn't report closures very well. This is true in
- CMU CL 18b as well:
- (PRINT #'CLASS-NAME)
- gives
- #<Closure Over Function "DEFUN STRUCTURE-SLOT-ACCESSOR" {134D1A1}>
- It would be nice to make closures have a settable name slot,
- and make things like DEFSTRUCT and FLET, which create closures,
- set helpful values into this slot.
-
33:
And as long as we're wishing, it would be awfully nice if INSPECT could
also report on closures, telling about the values of the bound variables.
so they could be supported after all. Very likely
SIGCONTEXT-FLOATING-POINT-MODES could now be supported, too.
-60:
- The debugger LIST-LOCATIONS command doesn't work properly.
- (How should it work properly?)
-
61:
Compiling and loading
(DEFUN FAIL (X) (THROW 'FAIL-TAG X))
then requesting a BACKTRACE at the debugger prompt gives no information
about where in the user program the problem occurred.
- (this is apparently mostly fixed on the SPARC and PPC architectures:
- while giving the backtrace the system complains about "unknown
+ (this is apparently mostly fixed on the SPARC, PPC, and x86 architectures:
+ while giving the backtrace the non-x86 systems complains about "unknown
source location: using block start", but apart from that the
- backtrace seems reasonable. See tests/debug.impure.lisp for a test
- case)
+ backtrace seems reasonable. On x86 this is masked by bug 353. See
+ tests/debug.impure.lisp for a test case)
64:
Using the pretty-printer from the command prompt gives funny
a STYLE-WARNING for references to variables similar to locals might
be a good thing.)
-125:
- (as reported by Gabe Garza on cmucl-help 2001-09-21)
- (defvar *tmp* 3)
- (defun test-pred (x y)
- (eq x y))
- (defun test-case ()
- (let* ((x *tmp*)
- (func (lambda () x)))
- (print (eq func func))
- (print (test-pred func func))
- (delete func (list func))))
- Now calling (TEST-CASE) gives output
- NIL
- NIL
- (#<FUNCTION {500A9EF9}>)
- Evidently Python thinks of the lambda as a code transformation so
- much that it forgets that it's also an object.
-
135:
Ideally, uninterning a symbol would allow it, and its associated
FDEFINITION and PROCLAIM data, to be reclaimed by the GC. However,
conformance problem, since seems hard to construct useful code
where it matters.)
+ [ partially fixed by CSR in 0.8.17.17 because of a PFD ansi-tests
+ report that (COMPLEX RATIO) was failing; still failing on types of
+ the form (AND NUMBER (SATISFIES REALP) (SATISFIES ZEROP)). ]
+
b. (fixed in 0.8.3.43)
146:
b. The same for CSUBTYPEP.
262: "yet another bug in inline expansion of local functions"
- Compiler fails on
-
- (defun foo (x y)
- (declare (integer x y))
- (+ (block nil
- (flet ((xyz (u)
- (declare (integer u))
- (if (> (1+ (the unsigned-byte u)) 0)
- (+ 1 u)
- (return (+ 38 (cos (/ u 78)))))))
- (declare (inline xyz))
- (return-from foo
- (* (funcall (eval #'xyz) x)
- (if (> x 30)
- (funcall (if (> x 5) #'xyz #'identity)
- (+ x 13))
- 38)))))
- (sin (* x y))))
-
- Urgh... It's time to write IR1-copier.
+ During inline expansion of a local function Python can try to
+ reference optimized away objects (functions, variables, CTRANs from
+ tags and blocks), which later may lead to problems. Some of the
+ cases are worked around by forbidding expansion in such cases, but
+ the better way would be to reimplement inline expansion by copying
+ IR1 structures.
266:
David Lichteblau provided (sbcl-devel 2003-06-01) a patch to fix
(fixed in 0.8.2.51, but a test case would be good)
+276:
+ b. The same as in a., but using MULTIPLE-VALUE-SETQ instead of SETQ.
+ c. (defvar *faa*)
+ (defmethod faa ((*faa* double-float))
+ (set '*faa* (when (< *faa* 0) (- *faa*)))
+ (1+ *faa*))
+ (faa 1d0) => type error
+
278:
a.
(defun foo ()
The problem is that both EVALs sequentially write to the same LVAR.
-305:
- (Reported by Dave Roberts.)
- Local INLINE/NOTINLINE declaration removes local FTYPE declaration:
-
- (defun quux (x)
- (declare (ftype (function () (integer 0 10)) fee)
- (inline fee))
- (1+ (fee)))
-
- uses generic arithmetic with INLINE and fixnum without.
-
306: "Imprecise unions of array types"
a.(defun foo (x)
(declare (optimize speed)
Expected: (2 6 15 38)
Got: ERROR
-317: "FORMAT of floating point numbers"
- reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
- test suite.
- (format nil "~1F" 10) => "0." ; "10." expected
- (format nil "~0F" 10) => "0." ; "10." expected
- (format nil "~2F" 1234567.1) => "1000000." ; "1234567." expected
- it would be nice if whatever fixed this also untangled the two
- competing implementations of floating point printing (Steele and
- White, and Burger and Dybvig) present in src/code/print.lisp
-
318: "stack overflow in compiler warning with redefined class"
reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
test suite.
in the wrapper, and then to update the instance just run through
all the old wrappers in order from oldest to newest.
-331: "lazy creation of CLOS classes for user-defined conditions"
- (defstruct foo)
- (defstruct (bar (:include foo)))
- (sb-mop:class-direct-subclasses (find-class 'foo))
- returns NIL, rather than a singleton list containing the BAR class.
-
332: "fasl stack inconsistency in structure redefinition"
(reported by Tim Daly Jr sbcl-devel 2004-05-06)
Even though structure redefinition is undefined by the standard, the
(it is likely that the fault lies in PPRINT-LOGICAL-BLOCK, as
suggested by the suggested implementation of PPRINT-TABULAR)
-342: PPRINT-TABULAR / PPRINT-LOGICAL-BLOCK logical block start position
- The logical block introduced by PPRINT-LOGICAL-BLOCK should not
- include the prefix, so that
- (pprint-tabular *standard-output* '(1 2 3) t nil 2)
- should print
- "(1 2 3)" rather than "(1 2 3)".
-
343: MOP:COMPUTE-DISCRIMINATING-FUNCTION overriding causes error
Even the simplest possible overriding of
COMPUTE-DISCRIMINATING-FUNCTION, suggested in the PCL implementation
(Note: there's at least one dubious thing in room.lisp: see the
comment in VALID-OBJ)
-345: backtrace on x86 undefined function
- In sbcl-0.8.13 (and probably earlier versions), code of the form
- (flet ((test () (#:undefined-fun 42)))
- (funcall #'test))
- yields the debugger with a poorly-functioning backtrace. Brian
- Downing fixed most of the problems on non-x86 architectures, but on
- the x86 the backtrace from this evaluation does not reveal anything
- about the problem. (See tests in debug.impure.lisp)
-
346: alpha backtrace
In sbcl-0.8.13, all backtraces from errors caused by internal errors
on the alpha seem to have a "bogus stack frame".
-348:
- Structure slot setters do not preserve evaluation order:
-
- (defstruct foo (x))
-
- (let ((i (eval '-2))
- (x (make-foo)))
- (funcall #'(setf foo-x)
- (incf i)
- (aref (vector x) (incf i)))
- (foo-x x))
- => error
-
349: PPRINT-INDENT rounding implementation decisions
At present, pprint-indent (and indeed the whole pretty printer)
more-or-less assumes that it's using a monospace font. That's
pprinter and only truncated at output? (So that indenting by 1/2
then 3/2 would indent by two spaces, not one?)
-351: suboptimal error handling/reporting when compiling (PUSH (LET ...))
- (fixed in 0.8.16.37)
+352: forward-referenced-class trouble
+ reported by Bruno Haible on sbcl-devel
+ (defclass c (a) ())
+ (setf (class-name (find-class 'a)) 'b)
+ (defclass a () (x))
+ (defclass b () (y))
+ (make-instance 'c)
+ Expected: an instance of c, with a slot named x
+ Got: debugger invoked on a SIMPLE-ERROR in thread 78906:
+ While computing the class precedence list of the class named C.
+ The class named B is a forward referenced class.
+ The class named B is a direct superclass of the class named C.
+
+353: debugger suboptimalities on x86
+ On x86 backtraces for undefined functions start with a bogus stack
+ frame, and backtraces for throws to unknown catch tags with a "no
+ debug information" frame. These are both due to CODE-COMPONENT-FROM-BITS
+ (used on non-x86 platforms) being a more complete solution then what
+ is done on x86.
+
+ On x86/linux large portions of tests/debug.impure.lisp have been commented
+ out as failures. The probable culprit for these problems is in x86-call-context
+ (things work fine on x86/freebsd).
+
+ More generally, the debugger internals suffer from excessive x86/non-x86
+ conditionalization and OAOOMization: refactoring the common parts would
+ be good.
+
+354: XEPs in backtraces
+ Under default compilation policy
+ (defun test ()
+ (throw :unknown t))
+ (test)
+ Has the XEP for TEST in the backtrace, not the TEST frame itself.
+ (sparc and x86 at least)
+
+ Since SBCL 0.8.20.1 this is hidden unless *SHOW-ENTRY-POINT-DETAILS*
+ is true (instead there appear two TEST frames at least on ppc). The
+ underlying cause seems to be that SB-C::TAIL-ANNOTATE will not merge
+ the tail-call for the XEP, since Python has by that time proved that
+ the function can never return; same happens if the function holds an
+ unconditional call to ERROR.
+
+355: change-class of generic-function
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ The MOP doesn't support change-class on a generic-function. However, SBCL
+ apparently supports it, since it doesn't give an error or warning when doing
+ so so. Then, however, it produces wrong results for calls to this generic
+ function.
+ ;;; The effective-methods cache:
+ (progn
+ (defgeneric testgf35 (x))
+ (defmethod testgf35 ((x integer))
+ (cons 'integer (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method))))
+ (defmethod testgf35 ((x real))
+ (cons 'real (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method))))
+ (defclass customized5-generic-function (standard-generic-function)
+ ()
+ (:metaclass sb-pcl:funcallable-standard-class))
+ (defmethod sb-pcl:compute-effective-method ((gf customized5-generic-function) method-combination methods)
+ `(REVERSE ,(call-next-method)))
+ (list
+ (testgf35 3)
+ (progn
+ (change-class #'testgf35 'customized5-generic-function)
+ (testgf35 3))))
+ Expected: ((INTEGER REAL) (REAL INTEGER))
+ Got: ((INTEGER REAL) (INTEGER REAL))
+ ;;; The discriminating-function cache:
+ (progn
+ (defgeneric testgf36 (x))
+ (defmethod testgf36 ((x integer))
+ (cons 'integer (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method))))
+ (defmethod testgf36 ((x real))
+ (cons 'real (if (next-method-p) (call-next-method))))
+ (defclass customized6-generic-function (standard-generic-function)
+ ()
+ (:metaclass sb-pcl:funcallable-standard-class))
+ (defmethod sb-pcl:compute-discriminating-function ((gf customized6-generic-function))
+ (let ((orig-df (call-next-method)))
+ #'(lambda (&rest arguments)
+ (reverse (apply orig-df arguments)))))
+ (list
+ (testgf36 3)
+ (progn
+ (change-class #'testgf36 'customized6-generic-function)
+ (testgf36 3))))
+ Expected: ((INTEGER REAL) (REAL INTEGER))
+ Got: ((INTEGER REAL) (INTEGER REAL))
+
+356: PCL corruption
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ After the "layout depth conflict" error, the CLOS is left in a state where
+ it's not possible to define new standard-class subclasses any more.
+ Test case:
+ (defclass prioritized-dispatcher ()
+ ((dependents :type list :initform nil)))
+ (defmethod sb-pcl:validate-superclass ((c1 sb-pcl:funcallable-standard-class)
+ (c2 (eql (find-class 'prioritized-dispatcher))))
+ t)
+ (defclass prioritized-generic-function (prioritized-dispatcher standard-generic-function)
+ ()
+ (:metaclass sb-pcl:funcallable-standard-class))
+ ;; ERROR, Quit the debugger with ABORT
+ (defclass typechecking-reader-class (standard-class)
+ ())
+ Expected: #<STANDARD-CLASS TYPECHECKING-READER-CLASS>
+ Got: ERROR "The assertion SB-PCL::WRAPPERS failed."
+
+357: defstruct inheritance of initforms
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ When defstruct and defclass (with :metaclass structure-class) are mixed,
+ 1. some slot initforms are ignored by the DEFSTRUCT generated constructor
+ function, and
+ 2. all slot initforms are ignored by MAKE-INSTANCE. (This can be arguably
+ OK for initforms that were given in a DEFSTRUCT form, but for those
+ given in a DEFCLASS form, I think it qualifies as a bug.)
+ Test case:
+ (defstruct structure02a
+ slot1
+ (slot2 t)
+ (slot3 (floor pi)))
+ (defclass structure02b (structure02a)
+ ((slot4 :initform -44)
+ (slot5)
+ (slot6 :initform t)
+ (slot7 :initform (floor (* pi pi)))
+ (slot8 :initform 88))
+ (:metaclass structure-class))
+ (defstruct (structure02c (:include structure02b (slot8 -88)))
+ slot9
+ (slot10 t)
+ (slot11 (floor (exp 3))))
+ ;; 1. Form:
+ (let ((a (make-structure02c)))
+ (list (structure02c-slot4 a)
+ (structure02c-slot5 a)
+ (structure02c-slot6 a)
+ (structure02c-slot7 a)))
+ Expected: (-44 nil t 9)
+ Got: (SB-PCL::..SLOT-UNBOUND.. SB-PCL::..SLOT-UNBOUND..
+ SB-PCL::..SLOT-UNBOUND.. SB-PCL::..SLOT-UNBOUND..)
+ ;; 2. Form:
+ (let ((b (make-instance 'structure02c)))
+ (list (structure02c-slot2 b)
+ (structure02c-slot3 b)
+ (structure02c-slot4 b)
+ (structure02c-slot6 b)
+ (structure02c-slot7 b)
+ (structure02c-slot8 b)
+ (structure02c-slot10 b)
+ (structure02c-slot11 b)))
+ Expected: (t 3 -44 t 9 -88 t 20)
+ Got: (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0)
+
+358: :DECLARE argument to ENSURE-GENERIC-FUNCTION
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ According to ANSI CL, ensure-generic-function must accept a :DECLARE
+ keyword argument. In SBCL 0.8.16 it does not.
+ Test case:
+ (progn
+ (ensure-generic-function 'foo113 :declare '((optimize (speed 3))))
+ (sb-pcl:generic-function-declarations #'foo113))
+ Expected: ((OPTIMIZE (SPEED 3)))
+ Got: ERROR
+ Invalid initialization argument:
+ :DECLARE
+ in call for class #<SB-MOP:FUNCALLABLE-STANDARD-CLASS STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION>.
+ See also:
+ The ANSI Standard, Section 7.1.2
+
+ Bruno notes: The MOP specifies that ensure-generic-function accepts :DECLARATIONS.
+ The easiest way to be compliant to both specs is to accept both (exclusively
+ or cumulatively).
+
+359: wrong default value for ensure-generic-function's :generic-function-class argument
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ ANSI CL is silent on this, but the MOP's specification of ENSURE-GENERIC-FUNCTION says:
+ "The remaining arguments are the complete set of keyword arguments
+ received by ENSURE-GENERIC-FUNCTION."
+ and the spec of ENSURE-GENERIC-FUNCTION-USING-CLASS:
+ ":GENERIC-FUNCTION-CLASS - a class metaobject or a class name. If it is not
+ supplied, it defaults to the class named STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION."
+ This is not the case in SBCL. Test case:
+ (defclass my-generic-function (standard-generic-function)
+ ()
+ (:metaclass sb-pcl:funcallable-standard-class))
+ (setf (fdefinition 'foo1)
+ (make-instance 'my-generic-function :name 'foo1))
+ (ensure-generic-function 'foo1
+ :generic-function-class (find-class 'standard-generic-function))
+ (class-of #'foo1)
+ ; => #<SB-MOP:FUNCALLABLE-STANDARD-CLASS STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION>
+ (setf (fdefinition 'foo2)
+ (make-instance 'my-generic-function :name 'foo2))
+ (ensure-generic-function 'foo2)
+ (class-of #'foo2)
+ Expected: #<SB-MOP:FUNCALLABLE-STANDARD-CLASS STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION>
+ Got: #<SB-MOP:FUNCALLABLE-STANDARD-CLASS MY-GENERIC-FUNCTION>
+
+360: CALL-METHOD not recognized in method-combination body
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ This method combination, which adds 'redo' and 'return' restarts for each
+ method invocation to standard method combination, gives an error in SBCL.
+ (defun prompt-for-new-values ()
+ (format *debug-io* "~&New values: ")
+ (list (read *debug-io*)))
+ (defun add-method-restarts (form method)
+ (let ((block (gensym))
+ (tag (gensym)))
+ `(BLOCK ,block
+ (TAGBODY
+ ,tag
+ (RETURN-FROM ,block
+ (RESTART-CASE ,form
+ (METHOD-REDO ()
+ :REPORT (LAMBDA (STREAM) (FORMAT STREAM "Try calling ~S again." ,method))
+ (GO ,tag))
+ (METHOD-RETURN (L)
+ :REPORT (LAMBDA (STREAM) (FORMAT STREAM "Specify return values for ~S call." ,method))
+ :INTERACTIVE (LAMBDA () (PROMPT-FOR-NEW-VALUES))
+ (RETURN-FROM ,block (VALUES-LIST L)))))))))
+ (defun convert-effective-method (efm)
+ (if (consp efm)
+ (if (eq (car efm) 'CALL-METHOD)
+ (let ((method-list (third efm)))
+ (if (or (typep (first method-list) 'method) (rest method-list))
+ ; Reduce the case of multiple methods to a single one.
+ ; Make the call to the next-method explicit.
+ (convert-effective-method
+ `(CALL-METHOD ,(second efm)
+ ((MAKE-METHOD
+ (CALL-METHOD ,(first method-list) ,(rest method-list))))))
+ ; Now the case of at most one method.
+ (if (typep (second efm) 'method)
+ ; Wrap the method call in a RESTART-CASE.
+ (add-method-restarts
+ (cons (convert-effective-method (car efm))
+ (convert-effective-method (cdr efm)))
+ (second efm))
+ ; Normal recursive processing.
+ (cons (convert-effective-method (car efm))
+ (convert-effective-method (cdr efm))))))
+ (cons (convert-effective-method (car efm))
+ (convert-effective-method (cdr efm))))
+ efm))
+ (define-method-combination standard-with-restarts ()
+ ((around (:around))
+ (before (:before))
+ (primary () :required t)
+ (after (:after)))
+ (flet ((call-methods-sequentially (methods)
+ (mapcar #'(lambda (method)
+ `(CALL-METHOD ,method))
+ methods)))
+ (let ((form (if (or before after (rest primary))
+ `(MULTIPLE-VALUE-PROG1
+ (PROGN
+ ,@(call-methods-sequentially before)
+ (CALL-METHOD ,(first primary) ,(rest primary)))
+ ,@(call-methods-sequentially (reverse after)))
+ `(CALL-METHOD ,(first primary)))))
+ (when around
+ (setq form
+ `(CALL-METHOD ,(first around)
+ (,@(rest around) (MAKE-METHOD ,form)))))
+ (convert-effective-method form))))
+ (defgeneric testgf16 (x) (:method-combination standard-with-restarts))
+ (defclass testclass16a () ())
+ (defclass testclass16b (testclass16a) ())
+ (defclass testclass16c (testclass16a) ())
+ (defclass testclass16d (testclass16b testclass16c) ())
+ (defmethod testgf16 ((x testclass16a))
+ (list 'a
+ (not (null (find-restart 'method-redo)))
+ (not (null (find-restart 'method-return)))))
+ (defmethod testgf16 ((x testclass16b))
+ (cons 'b (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod testgf16 ((x testclass16c))
+ (cons 'c (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod testgf16 ((x testclass16d))
+ (cons 'd (call-next-method)))
+ (testgf16 (make-instance 'testclass16d))
+
+ Expected: (D B C A T T)
+ Got: ERROR CALL-METHOD outside of a effective method form
+
+ This is a bug because ANSI CL HyperSpec/Body/locmac_call-m__make-method
+ says
+ "The macro call-method invokes the specified method, supplying it with
+ arguments and with definitions for call-next-method and for next-method-p.
+ If the invocation of call-method is lexically inside of a make-method,
+ the arguments are those that were supplied to that method. Otherwise
+ the arguments are those that were supplied to the generic function."
+ and the example uses nothing more than these two cases (as you can see by
+ doing (trace convert-effective-method)).
+
+361: initialize-instance of standard-reader-method ignores :function argument
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ Pass a custom :function argument to initialize-instance of a
+ standard-reader-method instance, but it has no effect.
+ ;; Check that it's possible to define reader methods that do typechecking.
+ (progn
+ (defclass typechecking-reader-method (sb-pcl:standard-reader-method)
+ ())
+ (defmethod initialize-instance ((method typechecking-reader-method) &rest initargs
+ &key slot-definition)
+ (let ((name (sb-pcl:slot-definition-name slot-definition))
+ (type (sb-pcl:slot-definition-type slot-definition)))
+ (apply #'call-next-method method
+ :function #'(lambda (args next-methods)
+ (declare (ignore next-methods))
+ (apply #'(lambda (instance)
+ (let ((value (slot-value instance name)))
+ (unless (typep value type)
+ (error "Slot ~S of ~S is not of type ~S: ~S"
+ name instance type value))
+ value))
+ args))
+ initargs)))
+ (defclass typechecking-reader-class (standard-class)
+ ())
+ (defmethod sb-pcl:validate-superclass ((c1 typechecking-reader-class) (c2 standard-class))
+ t)
+ (defmethod reader-method-class ((class typechecking-reader-class) direct-slot &rest args)
+ (find-class 'typechecking-reader-method))
+ (defclass testclass25 ()
+ ((pair :type (cons symbol (cons symbol null)) :initarg :pair :accessor testclass25-pair))
+ (:metaclass typechecking-reader-class))
+ (macrolet ((succeeds (form)
+ `(not (nth-value 1 (ignore-errors ,form)))))
+ (let ((p (list 'abc 'def))
+ (x (make-instance 'testclass25)))
+ (list (succeeds (make-instance 'testclass25 :pair '(seventeen 17)))
+ (succeeds (setf (testclass25-pair x) p))
+ (succeeds (setf (second p) 456))
+ (succeeds (testclass25-pair x))
+ (succeeds (slot-value x 'pair))))))
+ Expected: (t t t nil t)
+ Got: (t t t t t)
+
+ (inspect (first (sb-pcl:generic-function-methods #'testclass25-pair)))
+ shows that the method was created with a FAST-FUNCTION slot but with a
+ FUNCTION slot of NIL.
+
+362: missing error when a slot-definition is created without a name
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ The MOP says about slot-definition initialization:
+ "The :NAME argument is a slot name. An ERROR is SIGNALled if this argument
+ is not a symbol which can be used as a variable name. An ERROR is SIGNALled
+ if this argument is not supplied."
+ Test case:
+ (make-instance (find-class 'sb-pcl:standard-direct-slot-definition))
+ Expected: ERROR
+ Got: #<SB-MOP:STANDARD-DIRECT-SLOT-DEFINITION NIL>
+
+363: missing error when a slot-definition is created with a wrong documentation object
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ The MOP says about slot-definition initialization:
+ "The :DOCUMENTATION argument is a STRING or NIL. An ERROR is SIGNALled
+ if it is not. This argument default to NIL during initialization."
+ Test case:
+ (make-instance (find-class 'sb-pcl:standard-direct-slot-definition)
+ :name 'foo
+ :documentation 'not-a-string)
+ Expected: ERROR
+ Got: #<SB-MOP:STANDARD-DIRECT-SLOT-DEFINITION FOO>
+
+364: does not support class objects as specializer names
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ According to ANSI CL 7.6.2, class objects are valid specializer names,
+ and "Parameter specializer names are used in macros intended as the
+ user-level interface (defmethod)". DEFMETHOD's syntax section doesn't
+ mention this possibility in the BNF for parameter-specializer-name;
+ however, this appears to be an editorial omission, since the CLHS
+ mentions issue CLASS-OBJECT-SPECIALIZER:AFFIRM as being approved
+ by X3J13. SBCL doesn't support it:
+ (defclass foo () ())
+ (defmethod goo ((x #.(find-class 'foo))) x)
+ Expected: #<STANDARD-METHOD GOO (#<STANDARD-CLASS FOO>)>
+ Got: ERROR "#<STANDARD-CLASS FOO> is not a legal class name."
+
+365: mixin on generic-function subclass
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ a mixin class
+ (defclass prioritized-dispatcher ()
+ ((dependents :type list :initform nil)))
+ on a generic-function subclass:
+ (defclass prioritized-generic-function (prioritized-dispatcher standard-generic-function)
+ ()
+ (:metaclass sb-pcl:funcallable-standard-class))
+ SBCL gives an error on this, telling to define a method on SB-MOP:VALIDATE-SUPERCLASS. If done,
+ (defmethod sb-pcl:validate-superclass ((c1 sb-pcl:funcallable-standard-class)
+ (c2 (eql (find-class 'prioritized-dispatcher))))
+ t)
+ then, however,
+ (defclass prioritized-generic-function (prioritized-dispatcher standard-generic-function)
+ ()
+ (:metaclass sb-pcl:funcallable-standard-class))
+ => debugger invoked on a SIMPLE-ERROR in thread 6687:
+ layout depth conflict: #(#<SB-KERNEL:LAYOUT for T {500E1E9}> ...)
+
+ Further discussion on this: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.steel-bank.general/491
+
+366: cannot define two generic functions with user-defined class
+ (reported by Bruno Haible)
+ it is possible to define one generic function class and an instance
+ of it. But attempting to do the same thing again, in the same session,
+ leads to a "Control stack exhausted" error. Test case:
+ (defclass my-generic-function-1 (standard-generic-function)
+ ()
+ (:metaclass sb-pcl:funcallable-standard-class))
+ (defgeneric testgf-1 (x) (:generic-function-class my-generic-function-1)
+ (:method ((x integer)) (cons 'integer nil)))
+ (defclass my-generic-function-2 (standard-generic-function)
+ ()
+ (:metaclass sb-pcl:funcallable-standard-class))
+ (defgeneric testgf-2 (x) (:generic-function-class my-generic-function-2)
+ (:method ((x integer)) (cons 'integer nil)))
+ => SB-KERNEL::CONTROL-STACK-EXHAUSTED
+
+367: TYPE-ERROR at compile time, undetected TYPE-ERROR at runtime
+ This test program
+ (declaim (optimize (safety 3) (debug 2) (speed 2) (space 1)))
+ (defstruct e367)
+ (defstruct i367)
+ (defstruct g367
+ (i367s (make-array 0 :fill-pointer t) :type (or (vector i367) null)))
+ (defstruct s367
+ (g367 (error "missing :G367") :type g367 :read-only t))
+ ;;; In sbcl-0.8.18, commenting out this (DECLAIM (FTYPE ... R367))
+ ;;; gives an internal error at compile time:
+ ;;; The value #<SB-KERNEL:NAMED-TYPE NIL> is not of
+ ;;; type SB-KERNEL:VALUES-TYPE.
+ (declaim (ftype (function ((vector i367) e367) (or s367 null)) r367))
+ (declaim (ftype (function ((vector e367)) (values)) h367))
+ (defun frob (v w)
+ (let ((x (g367-i367s (make-g367))))
+ (let* ((y (or (r367 x w)
+ (h367 x)))
+ (z (s367-g367 y)))
+ (format t "~&Y=~S Z=~S~%" y z)
+ (g367-i367s z))))
+ (defun r367 (x y) (declare (ignore x y)) nil)
+ (defun h367 (x) (declare (ignore x)) (values))
+ ;;; In sbcl-0.8.18, executing this form causes an low-level error
+ ;;; segmentation violation at #X9B0E1F4
+ ;;; (instead of the TYPE-ERROR that one might like).
+ (frob 0 (make-e367))
+ can be made to cause two different problems, as noted in the comments:
+ bug 367a: Compile and load the file. No TYPE-ERROR is signalled at
+ run time (in the (S367-G367 Y) form of FROB, when Y is NIL
+ instead of an instance of S367). Instead (on x86/Linux at least)
+ we end up with a segfault.
+ bug 367b: Comment out the (DECLAIM (FTYPE ... R367)), and compile
+ the file. The compiler fails with TYPE-ERROR at compile time.
+
+368: miscompiled OR (perhaps related to bug 367)
+ Trying to relax type declarations to find a workaround for bug 367,
+ it turns out that even when the return type isn't declared (or
+ declared to be T, anyway) the system remains confused about type
+ inference in code similar to that for bug 367:
+ (in-package :cl-user)
+ (declaim (optimize (safety 3) (debug 2) (speed 2) (space 1)))
+ (defstruct e368)
+ (defstruct i368)
+ (defstruct g368
+ (i368s (make-array 0 :fill-pointer t) :type (or (vector i368) null)))
+ (defstruct s368
+ (g368 (error "missing :G368") :type g368 :read-only t))
+ (declaim (ftype (function (fixnum (vector i368) e368) t) r368))
+ (declaim (ftype (function (fixnum (vector e368)) t) h368))
+ (defparameter *h368-was-called-p* nil)
+ (defun nsu (vertices e368)
+ (let ((i368s (g368-i368s (make-g368))))
+ (let ((fuis (r368 0 i368s e368)))
+ (format t "~&FUIS=~S~%" fuis)
+ (or fuis (h368 0 i368s)))))
+ (defun r368 (w x y)
+ (declare (ignore w x y))
+ nil)
+ (defun h368 (w x)
+ (declare (ignore w x))
+ (setf *h368-was-called-p* t)
+ (make-s368 :g368 (make-g368)))
+ (trace r368 h368)
+ (format t "~&calling NSU~%")
+ (let ((nsu (nsu #() (make-e368))))
+ (format t "~&NSU returned ~S~%" nsu)
+ (format t "~&*H368-WAS-CALLED-P*=~S~%" *h368-was-called-p*)
+ (assert (s368-p nsu))
+ (assert *h368-was-called-p*))
+ In sbcl-0.8.18, both ASSERTs fail, and (DISASSEMBLE 'NSU) shows
+ that no call to H368 is compiled.
+
+369: unlike-an-intersection behavior of VALUES-TYPE-INTERSECTION
+ In sbcl-0.8.18.2, the identity $(x \cap y \cap y)=(x \cap y)$
+ does not hold for VALUES-TYPE-INTERSECTION, even for types which
+ can be intersected exactly, so that ASSERTs fail in this test case:
+ (in-package :cl-user)
+ (let ((types (mapcar #'sb-c::values-specifier-type
+ '((values (vector package) &optional)
+ (values (vector package) &rest t)
+ (values (vector hash-table) &rest t)
+ (values (vector hash-table) &optional)
+ (values t &optional)
+ (values t &rest t)
+ (values nil &optional)
+ (values nil &rest t)
+ (values sequence &optional)
+ (values sequence &rest t)
+ (values list &optional)
+ (values list &rest t)))))
+ (dolist (x types)
+ (dolist (y types)
+ (let ((i (sb-c::values-type-intersection x y)))
+ (assert (sb-c::type= i (sb-c::values-type-intersection i x)))
+ (assert (sb-c::type= i (sb-c::values-type-intersection i y)))))))
+
+370: reader misbehaviour on large-exponent floats
+ (read-from-string "1.0s1000000000000000000000000000000000000000")
+ causes the reader to attempt to create a very large bignum (which it
+ will then attempt to coerce to a rational). While this isn't
+ completely wrong, it is probably not ideal -- checking the floating
+ point control word state and then returning the relevant float
+ (most-positive-short-float or short-float-infinity) or signalling an
+ error immediately would seem to make more sense.
+
+372: floating-point overflow not signalled on ppc/darwin
+ The following assertions in float.pure.lisp fail on ppc/darwin
+ (Mac OS X version 10.3.7):
+ (assert (raises-error? (scale-float 1.0 most-positive-fixnum)
+ floating-point-overflow))
+ (assert (raises-error? (scale-float 1.0d0 (1+ most-positive-fixnum))
+ floating-point-overflow)))
+ as the SCALE-FLOAT just returns
+ #.SB-EXT:SINGLE/DOUBLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY. These tests have been
+ disabled on Darwin for now.
+
+374: BIT-AND problem on ppc/darwin:
+ The BIT-AND test in bit-vector.impure-cload.lisp results in
+ fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 8356:
+ GC invariant lost, file "gc-common.c", line 605
+ on ppc/darwin. Test disabled for the duration.
+
+375: MISC.555
+ (compile nil '(lambda (p1)
+ (declare (optimize (speed 1) (safety 2) (debug 2) (space 0))
+ (type keyword p1))
+ (keywordp p1)))
+
+ fails on hairy type check in IR2.
+
+ 1. KEYWORDP is MAYBE-INLINE expanded (before TYPEP-like
+ transformation could eliminate it).
+
+ 2. From the only call of KEYWORDP the type of its argument is
+ derived to be KEYWORD.
+
+ 2. Type check for P1 is generated; it uses KEYWORDP to perform the
+ check, and so references the local function; from the KEYWORDP
+ argument type new CAST to KEYWORD is generated. The compiler
+ loops forever.
+
+377: Memory fault error reporting
+ On those architectures where :C-STACK-IS-CONTROL-STACK is in
+ *FEATURES*, we handle SIG_MEMORY_FAULT (SEGV or BUS) on an altstack,
+ so we cannot handle the signal directly (as in interrupt_handle_now())
+ in the case when the signal comes from some external agent (the user
+ using kill(1), or a fault in some foreign code, for instance). As
+ of sbcl-0.8.20.20, this is fixed by calling
+ arrange_return_to_lisp_function() to a new error-signalling
+ function, but as a result the error reporting is poor: we cannot
+ even tell the user at which address the fault occurred. We should
+ arrange such that arguments can be passed to the function called from
+ arrange_return_to_lisp_function(), but this looked hard to do in
+ general without suffering from memory leaks.
+
+378: floating-point exceptions not signalled on x86-64
+ Floating point traps are currently not enabled on the x86-64 port.
+ This is true for at least overflow detection (as tested in
+ float.pure.lisp) and divide-by-zero.
+
+379: TRACE :ENCAPSULATE NIL broken on ppc/darwin
+ See commented-out test-case in debug.impure.lisp.
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff