#(1 2 ((SB-IMPL::|,|) + 2 2) 4)
which probably isn't intentional.
-320: "shared to local slot in class redefinition"
- reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
- test suite.
- ;; Shared slot becomes local.
- ;; 4.3.6.1.: "The value of a slot that is specified as shared in
- ;; the old class and as local in the new class is retained."
- (multiple-value-bind (value condition)
- (ignore-errors
- (defclass foo85a ()
- ((size :initarg :size :initform 1 :allocation :class)))
- (defclass foo85b (foo85a) ())
- (setq i (make-instance 'foo85b))
- (defclass foo85a () ((size :initarg :size :initform 2) (other)))
- (slot-value i 'size))
- (list value (type-of condition)))
- should return (1 NULL) but returns (2 NULL) in sbcl-0.8.10. See
- ensuing discussion sbcl-devel for how to deal with this.
-
321: "DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION lambda list parsing"
reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
test suite.
to about 1024 (and similarly for signed-byte), so
(open "/dev/zero" :element-type '(unsigned-byte 1025))
gives an error in sbcl-0.8.10.
+
+325: "CLOSE :ABORT T on supeseding streams"
+ Closing a stream opened with :IF-EXISTS :SUPERSEDE with :ABORT T leaves no
+ file on disk, even if one existed before opening.
+
+ The illegality of this is not crystal clear, as the ANSI dictionary
+ entry for CLOSE says that when :ABORT is T superseded files are not
+ superseded (ie. the original should be restored), whereas the OPEN
+ entry says about :IF-EXISTS :SUPERSEDE "If possible, the
+ implementation should not destroy the old file until the new stream
+ is closed." -- implying that even though undesirable, early deletion
+ is legal. Restoring the original would none the less be the polite
+ thing to do.
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff