0.8.4.20

[sbcl.git] / BUGS

diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS
index 788da3e..dd0e902 100644 (file)
--- a/BUGS
+++ b/BUGS
@@ -464,12 +464,6 @@ WORKAROUND:
     * '``(FOO ,@',@S)
     ``(FOO SB-IMPL::BACKQ-COMMA-AT S)
 
-  b.
-    * (write '`(, .ala.) :readably t :pretty t)
-    `(,.ALA.)
-
-  (note the space between the comma and the point)
-
 143:
   (reported by Jesse Bouwman 2001-10-24 through the unfortunately
   prominent SourceForge web/db bug tracking system, which is 
@@ -753,20 +747,6 @@ WORKAROUND:
        (INTEGERP (CAR (MAKE-SEQUENCE '(CONS INTEGER *) 2)))
      can erroneously return T.
 
-214:
-  SBCL 0.6.12.43 fails to compile
-
-  (locally
-      (declare (optimize (inhibit-warnings 0) (compilation-speed 2)))
-    (flet ((foo (&key (x :vx x-p)) (list x x-p)))
-      (foo 1 2)))
-
-  or a more simple example:
-
-  (locally
-      (declare (optimize (inhibit-warnings 0) (compilation-speed 2)))
-    (lambda (x) (declare (fixnum x)) (if (< x 0) 0 (1- x))))
-
 215: ":TEST-NOT handling by functions"
   a. FIND and POSITION currently signal errors when given non-NIL for
      both their :TEST and (deprecated) :TEST-NOT arguments, but by
@@ -981,11 +961,6 @@ WORKAROUND:
 
   b. The same for CSUBTYPEP.
 
-261:
-    * (let () (list (the (values &optional fixnum) (eval '(values)))))
-    debugger invoked on condition of type TYPE-ERROR:
-      The value NIL is not of type FIXNUM.
-
 262: "yet another bug in inline expansion of local functions"
   Compiler fails on
 
@@ -1170,16 +1145,6 @@ WORKAROUND:
   The issue seems to be that construction of a discriminating function
   calls COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD with methods that are not all applicable.
 
-282: "type checking in full calls"
-  In current (0.8.3.6) implementation a CAST in a full call argument
-  is not checked; but the continuation between the CAST and the
-  combination has the "checked" type and CAST performs unsafe
-  coercion; this may lead to errors: if FOO is declared to take a
-  FIXNUM, this code will produce garbage on a machine with 30-bit
-  fixnums:
-
-    (foo (aref (the (array (unsigned-byte 32)) x)))
-
 283: Thread safety: libc functions
   There are places that we call unsafe-for-threading libc functions
   that we should find alternatives for, or put locks around.  Known or
@@ -1256,5 +1221,15 @@ WORKAROUND:
   the control word; however, this clobbers any change the user might
   have made.
 
-292:
-  (fixed in 0.8.3.74)
+295:
+  From Paul Dietz:
+
+  (ash -1000000000000 -10000000000000000000) ==> 0  ;; should be -1
+
+296:
+  (reported by Adam Warner, sbcl-devel 2003-09-23)
+
+  The --load toplevel argument does not perform any sanitization of its
+  argument.  As a result, files with Lisp pathname pattern characters
+  (#\* or #\?, for instance) or quotation marks can cause the system
+  to perform arbitrary behaviour.