(let ((x (1+ x)))
(call-next-method)))
Now (FOO 3) should return 3, but instead it returns 4.
-
-137:
- (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE) output should start with something
- including the name BACKTRACE, not (as in 0.pre7.88)
- just "0: (\"hairy arg processor\" ...)". Until about
- sbcl-0.pre7.109, the names in BACKTRACE were all screwed
- up compared to the nice useful names in sbcl-0.6.13.
- Around sbcl-0.pre7.109, they were mostly fixed by using
- NAMED-LAMBDA to implement DEFUN. However, there are still
- some screwups left, e.g. as of sbcl-0.pre7.109, there are
- still some functions named "hairy arg processor" and
- "SB-INT:&MORE processor".
141:
Pretty-printing nested backquotes doesn't work right, as
(defclass c0 (b) ())
(make-instance 'c19)
-177:
- (fixed in sbcl-0.7.4.24)
-
178: "AVER failure compiling confused THEs in FUNCALL"
In sbcl-0.7.4.24, compiling
(defun bug178 (x)
(defun bug178alternative (x)
(funcall (the nil x)))
+179:
+ (fixed in sbcl-0.7.4.28)
+
DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS
IR1-#:
These labels were used for bugs related to the old IR1 interpreter.