comfortable merging the patches in the CVS version of SBCL.
108:
- (TIME (ROOM T)) reports more than 200 Mbytes consed even for
- a clean, just-started SBCL system. And it seems to be right:
- (ROOM T) can bring a small computer to its knees for a *long*
- time trying to GC afterwards. Surely there's some more economical
- way to implement (ROOM T).
+ ROOM issues:
- Daniel Barlow doesn't know what fixed this, but observes that it
- doesn't seem to be the case in 0.8.7.3 any more. Instead, (ROOM T)
- in a fresh SBCL causes
+ a) ROOM works by walking over the heap linearly, instead of
+ following the object graph. Hence, it report garbage objects that
+ are unreachable. (Maybe this is a feature and not a bug?)
- debugger invoked on a SB-INT:BUG in thread 5911:
- failed AVER: "(SAP= CURRENT END)"
-
- unless a GC has happened beforehand.
+ b) ROOM uses MAP-ALLOCATED-OBJECTS to walk the heap, which doesn't
+ check all pointers as well as it should, and can hence become
+ confused, leading to aver failures. As of 1.0.13.21 these (the
+ SAP= aver in particular) should be mostly under control, but push
+ ROOM hard enough and it still might croak.
117:
When the compiler inline expands functions, it may be that different
isn't too surprising since there are many differences in stack
implementation and GC conservatism between the X86 and other ports.)
+ (Can't reproduce on x86 linux as of 1.0.20.23 - MGL)
+
This is probably the same bug as 216
173:
(print (incf start 22))
(print (incf start 26))))))
+ [ Update: 1.0.14.36 improved this quite a bit (20-25%) by
+ eliminating useless work from PROPAGATE-FROM-SETS -- but as alluded
+ below, maybe we should be smarter about when to decide a derived
+ type is "good enough". ]
+
This example could be solved with clever enough constraint
propagation or with SSA, but consider
c. The cross-compiler cannot inline functions defined in a non-null
lexical environment.
-206: ":SB-FLUID feature broken"
- (reported by Antonio Martinez-Shotton sbcl-devel 2002-10-07)
- Enabling :SB-FLUID in the target-features list in sbcl-0.7.8 breaks
- the build.
-
207: "poorly distributed SXHASH results for compound data"
SBCL's SXHASH could probably try a little harder. ANSI: "the
intent is that an implementation should make a good-faith
the bad VECTOR-PUSH-EXTEND frame causes GC problems, though that may
not be the actual problem. (CMU CL 18c doesn't have problems with this.)
+ (Can't reproduce on x86 linux as of 1.0.20.22 - MGL)
+
This is probably the same bug as 162
235: "type system and inline expansion"
(open "/dev/zero" :element-type '(unsigned-byte 1025))
gives an error in sbcl-0.8.10.
-325: "CLOSE :ABORT T on supeseding streams"
+325: "CLOSE :ABORT T on superseding streams"
Closing a stream opened with :IF-EXISTS :SUPERSEDE with :ABORT T leaves no
file on disk, even if one existed before opening.
385:
(format nil "~4,1F" 0.001) => "0.00" (should be " 0.0");
(format nil "~4,1@F" 0.001) => "+.00" (should be "+0.0").
+ (format nil "~E" 0.01) => "10.e-3" (should be "1.e-2");
+ (format nil "~G" 0.01) => "10.e-3" (should be "1.e-2");
386: SunOS/x86 stack exhaustion handling broken
According to <http://alfa.s145.xrea.com/sbcl/solaris-x86.html>, the
For some more details see comments for (define-alien-type-method
(c-string :deport-gen) ...) in host-c-call.lisp.
-402: "DECLAIM DECLARATION does not inform the PCL code-walker"
- reported by Vincent Arkesteijn:
-
- (declaim (declaration foo))
- (defgeneric bar (x))
- (defmethod bar (x)
- (declare (foo x))
- x)
-
- ==> WARNING: The declaration FOO is not understood by
- SB-PCL::SPLIT-DECLARATIONS.
- Please put FOO on one of the lists SB-PCL::*NON-VAR-DECLARATIONS*,
- SB-PCL::*VAR-DECLARATIONS-WITH-ARG*, or
- SB-PCL::*VAR-DECLARATIONS-WITHOUT-ARG*.
- (Assuming it is a variable declaration without argument).
-
403: FORMAT/PPRINT-LOGICAL-BLOCK of CONDITIONs ignoring *PRINT-CIRCLE*
In sbcl-0.9.13.34,
(defparameter *c*
3: (SB-C::BOUND-FUNC ...)
4: (SB-C::%SINGLE-FLOAT-DERIVE-TYPE-AUX ...)
+ These are now fixed, but (COERCE HUGE 'SINGLE-FLOAT) still signals a
+ type-error at runtime. The question is, should it instead signal a
+ floating-point overflow, or return an infinity?
+
408: SUBTYPEP confusion re. OR of SATISFIES of not-yet-defined predicate
As reported by Levente M\'{e}sz\'{a}ros sbcl-devel 2006-02-20,
(aver (equal (multiple-value-list
implementation of read circularity, using a symbol as a marker for
the previously-referenced object.
-413: type-errors in ROOM
-
- (defvar *a* (make-array (expt 2 27)))
- (room)
-
- Causes a type-error on 32bit SBCL, as various byte-counts in ROOM
- implementation overrun fixnums.
-
- This was fixed in 1.0.4.89, but the patch was reverted as it caused
- ROOM to cons sufficiently to make running it in a loop deadly on
- GENCGC: newly allocated objects survived to generation 1, where next
- call to ROOM would see them, and allocate even more...
-
- Reported by Faré Rideau on sbcl-devel.
-
-414: strange DISASSEMBLE warning
-
- Compiling and disassembling
-
- (defun disassemble-source-form-bug (x y z)
- (declare (optimize debug))
- (list x y z))
-
- Gives
-
- WARNING: bogus form-number in form! The source file has probably
- been changed too much to cope with.
-
-415: Issues creating large arrays on x86-64/Linux and x86/Darwin
-
- (make-array (1- array-dimension-limit))
-
- causes a GC invariant violation on x86-64/Linux, and
- an unhandled SIGILL on x86/Darwin.
-
416: backtrace confusion
(defun foo (x)
419: stack-allocated indirect closure variables are not popped
- (locally (declare (optimize speed (safety 0)))
(defun bug419 (x)
(multiple-value-call #'list
(eval '(values 1 2 3))
(let ((x x))
- (declare (dynamic-extent x))
+ (declare (sb-int:truly-dynamic-extent x))
(flet ((mget (y)
(+ x y))
(mset (z)
(incf x z)))
(declare (dynamic-extent #'mget #'mset))
- ((lambda (f g) (eval `(progn ,f ,g (values 4 5 6)))) #'mget #'mset))))))
+ ((lambda (f g) (eval `(progn ,f ,g (values 4 5 6)))) #'mget #'mset)))))
+
+ (ASSERT (EQUAL (BUG419 42) '(1 2 3 4 5 6))) => failure
+
+ Note: as of SBCL 1.0.26.29 this bug no longer affects user code, as
+ SB-INT:TRULY-DYNAMIC-EXTENT needs to be used instead of
+ DYNAMIC-EXTENT for this to happen. Proper fix for this bug requires
+ (Nikodemus thinks) storing the relevant LAMBDA-VARs in a
+ :DYNAMIC-EXTENT cleanup, and teaching stack analysis how to deal
+ with them.
+
+421: READ-CHAR-NO-HANG misbehaviour on Windows Console:
+
+ It seems that on Windows READ-CHAR-NO-HANG hangs if the user
+ has pressed a key, but not yet enter (ie. SYSREAD-MAY-BLOCK-P
+ seems to lie if the OS is buffering input for us on Console.)
+
+ reported by Elliot Slaughter on sbcl-devel 2008/1/10.
+
+422: out-of-extent return not checked in safe code
+
+ (declaim (optimize safety))
+ (funcall (catch 't (block nil (throw 't (lambda () (return))))))
+
+behaves ...erratically. Reported by Kevin Reid on sbcl-devel
+2007-07-06. (We don't _have_ to check things like this, but we
+generally try to check returns in safe code, so we should here too.)
+
+424: toplevel closures and *CHECK-CONSISTENCY*
+
+ The following breaks under COMPILE-FILE if *CHECK-CONSISTENCY* is true.
+
+ (let ((exported-symbols-alist
+ (loop for symbol being the external-symbols of :cl
+ collect (cons symbol
+ (concatenate 'string
+ "#"
+ (string-downcase symbol))))))
+ (defun hyperdoc-lookup (symbol)
+ (cdr (assoc symbol exported-symbols-alist))))
+
+ (Test-case adapted from CL-PPCRE.)
+
+428: TIMER SCHEDULE-STRESS and PARALLEL-UNSCHEDULE in
+ timer.impure.lisp fails
+
+ Failure modes vary. Core problem seems to be (?) recursive entry to
+ RUN-EXPIRED-TIMERS.
+
+429: compiler hangs
+
+ Compiling a file with this contents makes the compiler loop in
+ ORDER-UVL-SETS:
+
+ (declaim (inline storage))
+ (defun storage (x)
+ (the (simple-array flt (*)) (unknown x)))
+
+ (defun test1 (lumps &key cg)
+ (let ((nodes (map 'list (lambda (lump) (storage lump))
+ lumps)))
+ (setf (aref nodes 0) 2)
+ (assert (every #'~= (apply #'concatenate 'list nodes) '(2 3 6 9)))))
+
+430: nested structure constructors do not stack allocate
+
+ (defun nada (x) (declare (ignore x)) nil)
+
+ (declaim (inline make-foo))
+ (defstruct foo bar)
+
+ (defun foo ()
+ (let ((x (list (make-foo))))
+ (declare (dynamic-extent x))
+ (nada x)))
+
+ Result of MAKE-FOO not stack allocated in FOO, because the function
+ HANDLE-NESTED-DYNAMIC-EXTENT-LVARS sees is not
+ %MAKE-STRUCTURE-INSTANCE, but no-yet-eliminated (VARARGS-ENTRY
+ MAKE-FOO).
- (ASSERT (EQUAL (BUG419) '(1 2 3 4 5 6))) => failure
+431: alien strucure redefinition doesn't work as expected
+ fixed in 1.0.21.29
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff