0.6.10:

[sbcl.git] / NEWS

diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 4130634..00e8230 100644 (file)
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -626,15 +626,18 @@ changes in sbcl-0.6.10 relative to sbcl-0.6.9:
 * Fasl file format version numbers have increased again, because
   a rearrangement of internal implementation packages made some 
   dumped symbols in old fasl files unreadable in new cores.
-?? (DECLAIM (OPTIMIZE ..)) now works.
 * DECLARE/DECLAIM/PROCLAIM logic is more nearly ANSI in general, with
   many fewer weird special cases.
 * Bug #17 (differing COMPILE-FILE behavior between logical and 
   physical pathnames) has been fixed, and some related misbehavior too,
   thanks to a patch from Martin Atzmueller.
-?? #'(SETF DOCUMENTATION) is now defined.
+* Bug #30 (reader problems) is gone, thanks to a CMU CL patch
+  by Tim Moore, ported to SBCL by Martin Atzmueller.
+* Martin Atzmueller fixed several filesystem-related problems,
+  including bug #36, in part by porting CMU CL patches, which were
+  written in part by Paul Werkowski.
 * More compiler warnings in src/runtime/ are gone, thanks to 
-  patches from Martin Atzmueller.
+  more patches from Martin Atzmueller.
 * Martin Atzmueller pointed out that bug 37 was fixed by his patches
   some time ago.
 
@@ -644,3 +647,7 @@ planned incompatible changes in 0.7.x:
   instead of the old "5]", "5]]", "5]]]" sequence. (I was motivated
   to do this when ILISP and SBCL got into arguments which left me
   deeply nested in the debugger.)
+* When the profiling interface settles down, it might impact TRACE.
+  They both encapsulate functions, and it's not clear yet how
+  e.g. UNPROFILE will interact with TRACE and UNTRACE. (This shouldn't
+  matter, though, unless you are using profiling.)