PROBLEM:
As long as I'm working on the batch-related command-line options,
it would be reasonable to add one more option to "do what I'd want",
- testing standard input for TTY-ness and running in no-programmer
+ testing standard input for non-TTY-ness and running in no-programmer
mode if so.
FIX:
?? Do it.
some functions, and I never realized that there's a wrapper-based
facility too until I was wading through the source code for SBCL.
Yes, I know I should have RTFM, but there is a lot of M..
+ (By the way, it would also be nice to have tracing behave
+ better with generic functions. TRACEing a generic function probably
+ shouldn't prevent DEFMETHOD from being used to redefine its
+ methods, and should perhaps trace each of its methods as well
+ as the generic function itself.)
FIX:
?? possibility 1: Add error-handling code in ntrace.lisp to
catch failure to set breakpoints and retry using
??
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROBLEM:
- My system of parallel build directories doesn't seem to add value.
+ My system of parallel build directories seems to add
+ complexity without adding value.
FIX:
?? Replace it with a system where fasl output files live in the
same directories as the sources and have names a la
The hashing code is new and should be tested.
FIX:
?? Enable the existing test code.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-PROBLEM:
- My ad hoc system of revision control is looking pretty clunky,
- and I've pretty much stopped doing stuff to confuse CVS (like moving
- directories around).
-FIX:
- ?? Check into CVS.
- ?? Make sure that the tags in FILE-COMMENTs expand correctly.
- ?? See about automatically propagating version information
- from CVS into the runtime.c banner message and the
- LISP-IMPLEMENTATION-VERSION string.
===============================================================================
other known issues with no particular target date: