message

[sbcl.git] / base-target-features.lisp-expr

diff --git a/base-target-features.lisp-expr b/base-target-features.lisp-expr
index 7b613dd..08f1a71 100644 (file)
--- a/base-target-features.lisp-expr
+++ b/base-target-features.lisp-expr
@@ -174,6 +174,11 @@
  ;; code (when applied to user-level packages), relating to material
  ;; alteration to packages or to bindings in symbols in packages.
  :sb-package-locks
+
+ ;; Support for the entirety of the 21-bit character space defined by
+ ;; the Unicode consortium, rather than the classical 8-bit ISO-8859-1
+ ;; character set.
+ :sb-unicode
  
  ;; This affects the definition of a lot of things in bignum.lisp. It
  ;; doesn't seem to be documented anywhere what systems it might apply
@@ -267,7 +272,7 @@
  ;;   :control-stack-grows-downward-not-upward
  ;;     On the X86, the Lisp control stack grows downward. On the
  ;;     other supported CPU architectures as of sbcl-0.7.1.40, the
- ;;     system stack grows upward. 
+ ;;     system stack grows upward.
  ;;   Note that there are other stack-related differences between the
  ;;   X86 port and the other ports. E.g. on the X86, the Lisp control
  ;;   stack coincides with the C stack, meaning that on the X86 there's
@@ -276,6 +281,9 @@
  ;;   just parameterized by #!+X86, but it'd probably be better to
  ;;   use new flags like :CONTROL-STACK-CONTAINS-C-STACK.
  ;;
+ ;;   :stack-allocatable-closures
+ ;;     The compiler can allocate dynamic-extent closures on stack.
+ ;;
  ;; operating system features:
  ;;   :linux   = We're intended to run under some version of Linux.
  ;;   :bsd     = We're intended to run under some version of BSD Unix. (This