+;;;; -*- Lisp -*-
+
;;;; tags which are set during the build process and which end up in
;;;; CL:*FEATURES* in the target SBCL, plus some comments about other
;;;; CL:*FEATURES* tags which have special meaning to SBCL or which
;;;;
;;;; Note that the recommended way to customize the features of a
;;;; local build of SBCL is not to edit this file, but instead to
-;;;; tweak customize-target-features.lisp. E.g. you can use code like
-;;;; this:
+;;;; tweak customize-target-features.lisp. If you define a function
+;;;; in customize-target-features.lisp, it will be used to transform
+;;;; the target features list after it's read and before it's used.
+;;;; E.g. you can use code like this:
;;;; (lambda (list)
;;;; (flet ((enable (x) (pushnew x list))
;;;; (disable (x) (setf list (remove x list))))
;;;; (enable :sb-after-xc-core)
;;;; #+nil (disable :sb-doc)
;;;; list))
-;;;; That way, because customize-target-features.lisp is in
-;;;; .cvsignore, your local changes will remain local even if you use
-;;;; "cvs diff" to submit patches to SBCL.
+;;;; By thus editing a local file (one which is not in the source
+;;;; distribution, and which is in .cvsignore) your customizations
+;;;; will remain local even if you do things like "cvs update",
+;;;; will not show up if you try to submit a patch with "cvs diff",
+;;;; and might even stay out of the way if you use other non-CVS-based
+;;;; methods to upgrade the files or store your configuration.
;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
;;;; more information.
;; our standard
:ansi-cl :common-lisp
;; FIXME: Isn't there a :x3jsomething feature which we should set too?
+ ;; No. CLHS says ":x3j13 [...] A conforming implementation might or
+ ;; might not contain such a feature." -- CSR, 2002-02-21
;; our dialect
:sbcl
;; Douglas Thomas Crosher's conservative generational GC (the only one
- ;; we currently support for X86)
- :gencgc
+ ;; we currently support for X86).
+ ;; :gencgc used to be here; CSR moved it into
+ ;; local-target-features.lisp-expr via make-config.sh, as alpha,
+ ;; sparc and ppc ports don't currently support it. -- CSR, 2002-02-21
;; We're running under a UNIX. This is sort of redundant, and it was also
;; sort of redundant under CMU CL, which we inherited it from: neither SBCL
;; Build SBCL with the old CMU CL low level debugger, "ldb". If
;; are aren't messing with CMU CL at a very low level (e.g.
- ;; trying to diagnose GC problems) you shouldn't need this.
+ ;; trying to diagnose GC problems, or trying to debug assembly
+ ;; code for a port to a new CPU) you shouldn't need this.
; :sb-ldb
;; This isn't really a target Lisp feature at all, but controls
;; whether the build process produces an after-xc.core file. This
- ;; can be useful for shortening the edit/compile/debug cycle if
- ;; you're messing around with low-level internals of the system,
- ;; as in slam.sh. Otherwise you don't need it.
+ ;; can be useful for shortening the edit/compile/debug cycle when
+ ;; you modify SBCL's own source code, as in slam.sh. Otherwise
+ ;; you don't need it.
; :sb-after-xc-core
;; Enable extra debugging output in the assem.lisp assembler/scheduler
;; anyone who wants to collect such statistics in the future.
; :sb-dyncount
- ;; Peter Van Eynde's increase-bulletproofness code
+ ;; Peter Van Eynde's increase-bulletproofness code for CMU CL
;;
- ;; This is not maintained or tested in current SBCL, but I haven't
- ;; gone out of my way to remove or break it, either.
+ ;; Some of the code which was #+high-security before the fork has now
+ ;; been either made unconditional, deleted, or rewritten into
+ ;; unrecognizability, but some remains. What remains is not maintained
+ ;; or tested in current SBCL, but I haven't gone out of my way to
+ ;; break it, either.
;;
; :high-security
; :high-security-support
;; the underlying x86 hardware tries).
:ieee-floating-point
- ;; This seems to be the pre-GENCGC garbage collector for CMU CL, which was
- ;; AFAIK never supported for the X86.
- ; :gengc
-
;; CMU CL had, and we inherited, code to support 80-bit LONG-FLOAT on the x86
;; architecture. Nothing has been done to actively destroy the long float
;; support, but it hasn't been thoroughly maintained, and needs at least
;; documented in the CMU CL code that SBCL is derived from, and is
;; present but stale in SBCL as of 0.6.12.)
;;
+ ;; properties derived from the machine architecture
+ ;; :control-stack-grows-downward-not-upward
+ ;; On the X86, the Lisp control stack grows downward. On the
+ ;; other supported CPU architectures as of sbcl-0.7.1.40, the
+ ;; system stack grows upward.
+ ;; Note that there are other stack-related differences between the
+ ;; X86 port and the other ports. E.g. on the X86, the Lisp control
+ ;; stack coincides with the C stack, meaning that on the X86 there's
+ ;; stuff on the control stack that the Lisp-level debugger doesn't
+ ;; understand very well. As of sbcl-0.7.1.40 things like that are
+ ;; just parameterized by #!+X86, but it'd probably be better to
+ ;; use new flags like :CONTROL-STACK-CONTAINS-C-STACK.
+ ;;
;; operating system features:
;; :linux = We're intended to run under some version of Linux.
;; :bsd = We're intended to run under some version of BSD Unix. (This
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff