0.8.16.11: Partial fix for #318 & more incompatible changes

[sbcl.git] / base-target-features.lisp-expr

diff --git a/base-target-features.lisp-expr b/base-target-features.lisp-expr
index a76ba4a..7b613dd 100644 (file)
--- a/base-target-features.lisp-expr
+++ b/base-target-features.lisp-expr
@@ -107,10 +107,10 @@
  ;; readtable configured so that the system sources can be read.
  ; :sb-show
 
- ;; Build SBCL with the old CMU CL low level debugger, "ldb". If 
- ;; are aren't messing with CMU CL at a very low level (e.g. 
- ;; trying to diagnose GC problems, or trying to debug assembly
- ;; code for a port to a new CPU) you shouldn't need this.
+ ;; Build SBCL with the old CMU CL low level debugger, "ldb". If are
+ ;; aren't messing with SBCL at a very low level (e.g., trying to
+ ;; diagnose GC problems, or trying to debug assembly code for a port
+ ;; to a new CPU) you shouldn't need this.
  ; :sb-ldb
 
  ;; This isn't really a target Lisp feature at all, but controls
@@ -169,8 +169,11 @@
  ;; runtime
  ; :sb-futex
 
- ;; Package locking support.
- ; :sb-package-locks
+ ;; Support for detection of unportable code (when applied to the
+ ;; COMMON-LISP package, or SBCL-internal pacakges) or bad-neighbourly
+ ;; code (when applied to user-level packages), relating to material
+ ;; alteration to packages or to bindings in symbols in packages.
+ :sb-package-locks
  
  ;; This affects the definition of a lot of things in bignum.lisp. It
  ;; doesn't seem to be documented anywhere what systems it might apply