0.9.2.46:

[sbcl.git] / base-target-features.lisp-expr

diff --git a/base-target-features.lisp-expr b/base-target-features.lisp-expr
index 7b613dd..7f9a524 100644 (file)
--- a/base-target-features.lisp-expr
+++ b/base-target-features.lisp-expr
@@ -154,26 +154,24 @@
 
  ;; low-level thread primitives support
  ;;
- ;; As of SBCL 0.8,  this is only supposed to work in x86 Linux, on which
- ;; system it's implemented using clone(2) and the %fs segment register.
- ;; Note that no consistent effort to audit the SBCL library code for
- ;; thread safety has been performed, so caveat executor.
+ ;; As of SBCL 0.8, this is only supposed to work in x86 Linux with
+ ;; NPTL support (usually kernel 2.6, though sme Red Hat distributions
+ ;; with older kernels also have it) and is implemented using clone(2)
+ ;; and the %fs segment register.  Note that no consistent effort to
+ ;; audit the SBCL library code for thread safety has been performed,
+ ;; so caveat executor.
  ; :sb-thread
 
- ;; Kernel support for futexes (so-called "fast userspace mutexes") is
- ;; available in Linux 2.6 and some versions of 2.4 (Red Hat vendor
- ;; kernels, possibly other vendors too).  We can take advantage of
- ;; these to do faster and probably more reliable mutex and condition
- ;; variable support.  An SBCL built with this feature will fall back
- ;; to the old system if the futex() syscall is not available at
- ;; runtime
- ; :sb-futex
-
  ;; Support for detection of unportable code (when applied to the
  ;; COMMON-LISP package, or SBCL-internal pacakges) or bad-neighbourly
  ;; code (when applied to user-level packages), relating to material
  ;; alteration to packages or to bindings in symbols in packages.
  :sb-package-locks
+
+ ;; Support for the entirety of the 21-bit character space defined by
+ ;; the Unicode consortium, rather than the classical 8-bit ISO-8859-1
+ ;; character set.
+ :sb-unicode
  
  ;; This affects the definition of a lot of things in bignum.lisp. It
  ;; doesn't seem to be documented anywhere what systems it might apply
@@ -267,7 +265,7 @@
  ;;   :control-stack-grows-downward-not-upward
  ;;     On the X86, the Lisp control stack grows downward. On the
  ;;     other supported CPU architectures as of sbcl-0.7.1.40, the
- ;;     system stack grows upward. 
+ ;;     system stack grows upward.
  ;;   Note that there are other stack-related differences between the
  ;;   X86 port and the other ports. E.g. on the X86, the Lisp control
  ;;   stack coincides with the C stack, meaning that on the X86 there's
@@ -276,6 +274,9 @@
  ;;   just parameterized by #!+X86, but it'd probably be better to
  ;;   use new flags like :CONTROL-STACK-CONTAINS-C-STACK.
  ;;
+ ;;   :stack-allocatable-closures
+ ;;     The compiler can allocate dynamic-extent closures on stack.
+ ;;
  ;; operating system features:
  ;;   :linux   = We're intended to run under some version of Linux.
  ;;   :bsd     = We're intended to run under some version of BSD Unix. (This