;;;; E.g. you can use code like this:
;;;; (lambda (list)
;;;; (flet ((enable (x) (pushnew x list))
-;;;; (disable (x) (setf list (remove x list))))
+;;;; (disable (x) (setf list (remove x list))))
;;;; #+nil (enable :sb-show)
;;;; (enable :sb-after-xc-core)
;;;; #+nil (disable :sb-doc)
;; been either made unconditional, deleted, or rewritten into
;; unrecognizability, but some remains. What remains is not maintained
;; or tested in current SBCL, but I haven't gone out of my way to
- ;; break it, either.
+ ;; break it, either.
;;
; :high-security
; :high-security-support
;; the Unicode consortium, rather than the classical 8-bit ISO-8859-1
;; character set.
:sb-unicode
-
+
;; This affects the definition of a lot of things in bignum.lisp. It
;; doesn't seem to be documented anywhere what systems it might apply
;; to. It doesn't seem to be needed for X86 systems anyway.
;; notes on local features (which are set automatically by the
;; configuration script, and should not be set here unless you
;; really, really know what you're doing):
- ;;
+ ;;
;; machine architecture features:
;; :x86
;; any Intel 386 or better, or compatibles like the AMD K6 or K7
;; :mips
;; any MIPS CPU (in little-endian mode with :little-endian -- currently
;; untested)
- ;;
+ ;;
;; (CMU CL also had a :pentium feature, which affected the definition
;; of some floating point vops. It was present but not enabled or
;; documented in the CMU CL code that SBCL is derived from, and has