-'#!/bin/sh
+#!/bin/sh
# "When we build software, it's a good idea to have a reliable method
# for getting an executable from it. We want any two reconstructions
# even though you have stuff in your initialization files
# which makes it behave in such a non-standard way that
# it keeps the build from working
-# "sbcl --noprogrammer"
+# "sbcl --disable-debugger"
# to use an existing SBCL binary as a cross-compilation host
-# and tell it to handle errors as best it can by itself,
-# without trying to use *DEBUG-IO* to ask for help from
-# the programmer
+# and tell it to handle errors as best it can by itself
+# (probably by dying with an error code) instead of waiting
+# endlessly for a programmer to help it out with input
+# on *DEBUG-IO*
# "lisp -batch" to use an existing CMU CL binary as a cross-compilation host
# "lisp -noinit -batch"
# to use an existing CMU CL binary as a cross-compilation host
# when you have weird things in your .cmucl-init file
+# "openmcl --batch"
+# to use an OpenMCL binary as a cross-compilation host
+# "clisp"
+# to use a CLISP binary as a cross-compilation host
#
# FIXME: Make a more sophisticated command line parser, probably
# accepting "sh make.sh --xc-host foolisp" instead of the
# require a second pass, just testing at build-the-cross-compiler time
# whether the cross-compilation host returns suitable values from
# UPGRADED-ARRAY-ELEMENT-TYPE?)
-export SBCL_XC_HOST="${1:-sbcl --noprogrammer}"
+# FIXME: --noprogrammer was deprecated in sbcl-0.7.5, replaced by
+# --disable-debugger. We still use the old form here because the
+# change was not preannounced, and it would be rude to make our new
+# version of SBCL unbootstrappable by immediately prior versions.
+# But in a year or so the --noprogrammer here can change to
+# --disable-debugger (and the deprecated --noprogrammer support can
+# go away completely).
+SBCL_XC_HOST="${1:-sbcl --noprogrammer}"
+export SBCL_XC_HOST
echo //SBCL_XC_HOST=\"$SBCL_XC_HOST\"
+. ./find-gnumake.sh
+find_gnumake
+
# If you're cross-compiling, you should probably just walk through the
# make-config.sh script by hand doing the right thing on both the host
# and target machines.
# identify the target architecture).
# On the host system:
# SBCL_XC_HOST=<whatever> sh make-host-1.sh
-# Copy src/runtime/sbcl.h from the host system to the target system.
+# Copy src/runtime/genesis/*.h from the host system to the target
+# system.
# On the target system:
# sh make-target-1.sh
-# Copy src/runtime/sbcl.nm from the target system to the host system.
+# Copy src/runtime/sbcl.nm and output/stuff-groveled-from-headers.lisp
+# from the target system to the host system.
# On the host system:
# SBCL_XC_HOST=<whatever> sh make-host-2.sh
# Copy output/cold-sbcl.core from the host system to the target system.
# On the target system:
-# sh make-host-2.sh
+# sh make-target-2.sh
+# sh make-target-contrib.sh
+# Or, if you can set up the files somewhere shared (with NFS, AFS, or
+# whatever) between the host machine and the target machine, the basic
+# procedure above should still work, but you can skip the "copy" steps.
sh make-host-1.sh || exit 1
sh make-target-1.sh || exit 1
sh make-host-2.sh || exit 1
sh make-target-2.sh || exit 1
+sh make-target-contrib.sh || exit 1
+
+# Sometimes people used to see the "No tests failed." output from the last
+# DEFTEST in contrib self-tests and thing that's all that is. So...
+echo
+echo The build seems to have finished successfully. If you would like
+echo run more extensive tests on the new SBCL, you can try
+echo " cd tests && sh ./run-tests.sh"
+echo "(but expect some failures on non-x86 platforms)."
+
date