;; rid of FDEFINITIONs entirely later.
"*SETF-FDEFINITION-HOOK*"
- ;; useful but non-standard user-level functions..
+ ;; non-standard but widely useful user-level functions..
"ASSQ" "DELQ" "MEMQ"
"%FIND-PACKAGE-OR-LOSE" "FIND-UNDELETED-PACKAGE-OR-LOSE"
"SANE-PACKAGE"
"CIRCULAR-LIST-P"
- ;; ..and macros
+ ;; ..and macros..
"COLLECT"
"DO-ANONYMOUS" "DOHASH" "DOVECTOR"
"ITERATE"
"LETF" "LETF*"
"ONCE-ONLY"
"DEFENUM"
+ "DEFPRINTER"
"DEF!MACRO" "DEF!METHOD" "DEF!STRUCT" "DEF!TYPE"
+ ;; ..and DEFTYPEs..
+ "INDEX"
+
+ ;; ..and type predicates
+ "INSTANCEP"
+ "DOUBLE-FLOATP"
+ "LOGICAL-PATHNAME-P"
+ "LONG-FLOATP"
+ "SHORT-FLOATP"
+ "SINGLE-FLOATP"
+
;; encapsulation
"ARGUMENT-LIST"
"BASIC-DEFINITION"
"BELL-CHAR-CODE" "ESCAPE-CHAR-CODE" "FORM-FEED-CHAR-CODE"
"RETURN-CHAR-CODE" "RUBOUT-CHAR-CODE" "TAB-CHAR-CODE"
- ;; handy user-level/basically-portable DEFTYPEs
- "INDEX"
-
- ;; nonstandard type predicates
- "INSTANCEP"
- "DOUBLE-FLOATP"
- "LOGICAL-PATHNAME-P"
- "LONG-FLOATP"
- "SHORT-FLOATP"
- "SINGLE-FLOATP"
-
;; symbol-hacking idioms
"CONCAT-PNAMES" "KEYWORDICATE" "SYMBOLICATE"
;; FIXME: Maybe this isn't used any more? And if it is,
;; it probably needs a better name, since SPECIAL things
- ;; are so obnoxious in Common Lisp.
+ ;; are such a nice source of sneaky bugs.
"E"
;; various internal defaults