1.0.21.9: refactor toplevel option processing somewhat

[sbcl.git] / package-data-list.lisp-expr

diff --git a/package-data-list.lisp-expr b/package-data-list.lisp-expr
index 3329b3c..f5e22ab 100644 (file)
--- a/package-data-list.lisp-expr
+++ b/package-data-list.lisp-expr
@@ -125,13 +125,13 @@ of SBCL which maintained the CMU-CL-style split into two packages.)"
                "*ASSEM-INSTRUCTIONS*"
                "*ASSEM-MAX-LOCATIONS*"
 
-               "EMIT-BYTE" "EMIT-SKIP" "EMIT-BACK-PATCH"
+               "EMIT-ALIGNMENT" "EMIT-BYTE" "EMIT-SKIP" "EMIT-BACK-PATCH"
                "EMIT-CHOOSER" "DEFINE-BITFIELD-EMITTER"
                "DEFINE-INSTRUCTION" "DEFINE-INSTRUCTION-MACRO"
                "DEF-ASSEMBLER-PARAMS" "EMIT-POSTIT"
 
-               "MAKE-SEGMENT" "SEGMENT-NAME" "ASSEMBLE"
-               "ALIGN" "INST" "LABEL" "LABEL-P" "GEN-LABEL"
+               "MAKE-SEGMENT" "SEGMENT-TYPE" "ASSEMBLE"
+               "INST" "LABEL" "LABEL-P" "GEN-LABEL"
                "EMIT-LABEL" "LABEL-POSITION" "APPEND-SEGMENT" "FINALIZE-SEGMENT"
                "ON-SEGMENT-CONTENTS-VECTORLY" "WRITE-SEGMENT-CONTENTS"
                "READS" "WRITES" "SEGMENT"
@@ -575,7 +575,12 @@ like *STACK-TOP-HINT* and unsupported stuff like *TRACED-FUN-LIST*."
                "*POSIX-ARGV*" "*CORE-PATHNAME*"
                "POSIX-GETENV" "POSIX-ENVIRON"
 
+               ;; Atomic operations
                "COMPARE-AND-SWAP"
+               "ATOMIC-INCF"
+
+               ;; Timing information
+               "CALL-WITH-TIMING"
 
                ;; People have various good reasons to mess with the GC.
                "*AFTER-GC-HOOKS*"
@@ -1226,6 +1231,7 @@ is a good idea, but see SB-SYS re. blurring of boundaries."
                "%LOG1P"
                #!+long-float "%LONG-FLOAT"
                "%MAKE-COMPLEX" "%MAKE-FUNCALLABLE-INSTANCE"
+               "%MAKE-FUNCALLABLE-STRUCTURE-INSTANCE-ALLOCATOR"
                "%MAKE-RATIO" "%MAKE-LISP-OBJ"
                "%MAKE-INSTANCE"
                "%MAKE-STRUCTURE-INSTANCE"
@@ -1266,6 +1272,8 @@ is a good idea, but see SB-SYS re. blurring of boundaries."
                "%RAW-SET-COMPLEX-DOUBLE" "%RAW-SET-COMPLEX-LONG"
                "%RAW-SET-COMPLEX-SINGLE" "%RAW-SET-DOUBLE"
                "%RAW-SET-LONG" "%RAW-SET-SINGLE" "%SCALB" "%SCALBN"
+               #!+(or x86 x86-64)
+               "%RAW-INSTANCE-ATOMIC-INCF/WORD"
                "%RAW-INSTANCE-REF/WORD" "%RAW-INSTANCE-SET/WORD"
                "%RAW-INSTANCE-REF/SINGLE" "%RAW-INSTANCE-SET/SINGLE"
                "%RAW-INSTANCE-REF/DOUBLE" "%RAW-INSTANCE-SET/DOUBLE"