0.8.9.29:

[sbcl.git] / src / code / cold-init.lisp

diff --git a/src/code/cold-init.lisp b/src/code/cold-init.lisp
index 6834b86..9711add 100644 (file)
--- a/src/code/cold-init.lisp
+++ b/src/code/cold-init.lisp
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
 \f
 ;;;; putting ourselves out of our misery when things become too much to bear
 
-(declaim (ftype (function (simple-string) nil) critically-unreachable))
+(declaim (ftype (function (simple-string) nil) !cold-lose))
 (defun !cold-lose (msg)
   (%primitive print msg)
   (%primitive print "too early in cold init to recover from errors")
@@ -296,17 +296,7 @@ instead (which is another name for the same thing)."))
       ;; call site.
       (set-floating-point-modes
        :traps '(:overflow #!-netbsd :invalid :divide-by-zero))
-      (sb!thread::maybe-install-futex-functions)
-
-      ;; Clear pseudo atomic in case this core wasn't compiled with
-      ;; support.
-      ;;
-      ;; FIXME: In SBCL our cores are always compiled with support. So
-      ;; we don't need to do this, do we? At least not for this
-      ;; reason.. (Perhaps we should do it anyway in case someone
-      ;; manages to save an image from within a pseudo-atomic-atomic
-      ;; operation?)
-      #!+x86 (setf *pseudo-atomic-atomic* 0)))
+      (sb!thread::maybe-install-futex-functions)))
   (gc-on)
   (gc))
 \f