0.7.9.33:

[sbcl.git] / src / code / condition.lisp

diff --git a/src/code/condition.lisp b/src/code/condition.lisp
index 1e5c7c7..d6cfa9d 100644 (file)
--- a/src/code/condition.lisp
+++ b/src/code/condition.lisp
@@ -604,6 +604,13 @@
             "The function ~S is undefined."
             (cell-error-name condition)))))
 
+(define-condition special-form-function (undefined-function) ()
+  (:report
+   (lambda (condition stream)
+     (format stream
+            "Cannot FUNCALL the SYMBOL-FUNCTION of special operator ~S."
+            (cell-error-name condition)))))
+
 (define-condition arithmetic-error (error)
   ((operation :reader arithmetic-error-operation
              :initarg :operation
@@ -691,7 +698,12 @@
 
 ;;; Out-of-range &KEY END arguments are similar to, but off by one
 ;;; from out-of-range indices into the sequence.
-(define-condition index-too-large-error (type-error)
+;;;
+;;; FIXME: Uh, but it isn't used for &KEY END things -- in fact, this
+;;; is only used in one place, in SUBSEQ.  Is it really necessary?  Is
+;;; it here so that we can actually go round seq.lisp decorating all
+;;; the sequence functions with extra checks?  -- CSR, 2002-11-01
+(define-condition end-too-large-error (type-error)
   ()
   (:report
    (lambda (condition stream)