(defun get-lisp-obj-address (thing) (get-lisp-obj-address thing))
(defun fun-word-offset (fun) (fun-word-offset fun))
-#!-sb-fluid (declaim (inline cstack-pointer-valid-p))
-(defun cstack-pointer-valid-p (x)
+#!-sb-fluid (declaim (inline control-stack-pointer-valid-p))
+(defun control-stack-pointer-valid-p (x)
(declare (type system-area-pointer x))
- #!-x86 ; stack grows toward high address values
+ #!-stack-grows-downward-not-upward
(and (sap< x (current-sp))
(sap<= (int-sap control-stack-start)
x)
(zerop (logand (sap-int x) #b11)))
- #!+x86 ; stack grows toward low address values
+ #!+stack-grows-downward-not-upward
(and (sap>= x (current-sp))
(sap> (int-sap control-stack-end) x)
(zerop (logand (sap-int x) #b11))))
(defun ra-pointer-valid-p (ra)
(declare (type system-area-pointer ra))
(and
- ;; Not the first page which is unmapped.
+ ;; not the first page (which is unmapped)
+ ;;
+ ;; FIXME: Where is this documented? Is it really true of every CPU
+ ;; architecture? Is it even necessarily true in current SBCL?
(>= (sap-int ra) 4096)
- ;; Not a Lisp stack pointer.
- (not (cstack-pointer-valid-p ra))))
+ ;; not a Lisp stack pointer
+ (not (control-stack-pointer-valid-p ra))))
;;; Try to find a valid previous stack. This is complex on the x86 as
;;; it can jump between C and Lisp frames. To help find a valid frame
(fixnum depth))
;;(format t "*CC ~S ~S~%" fp depth)
(cond
- ((not (cstack-pointer-valid-p fp))
+ ((not (control-stack-pointer-valid-p fp))
#+nil (format t "debug invalid fp ~S~%" fp)
nil)
(t
4))))
(c-ocfp (sap-ref-sap fp (* 0 sb!vm:n-word-bytes)))
(c-ra (sap-ref-sap fp (* 1 sb!vm:n-word-bytes))))
- (cond ((and (sap> lisp-ocfp fp) (cstack-pointer-valid-p lisp-ocfp)
+ (cond ((and (sap> lisp-ocfp fp) (control-stack-pointer-valid-p lisp-ocfp)
(ra-pointer-valid-p lisp-ra)
- (sap> c-ocfp fp) (cstack-pointer-valid-p c-ocfp)
+ (sap> c-ocfp fp) (control-stack-pointer-valid-p c-ocfp)
(ra-pointer-valid-p c-ra))
#+nil (format t
"*C Both valid ~S ~S ~S ~S~%"
(format t
"debug: both still valid ~S ~S ~S ~S~%"
lisp-ocfp lisp-ra c-ocfp c-ra))
- #+freebsd
+ #!+freebsd
(if (sap> lisp-ocfp c-ocfp)
(values lisp-ra lisp-ocfp)
(values c-ra c-ocfp))
- #-freebsd
+ #!-freebsd
(values lisp-ra lisp-ocfp))
(lisp-path-fp
;; The lisp convention is looking good.
#+nil (format t "debug: no valid2 fp found ~S ~S~%"
lisp-ocfp c-ocfp)
nil))))
- ((and (sap> lisp-ocfp fp) (cstack-pointer-valid-p lisp-ocfp)
+ ((and (sap> lisp-ocfp fp) (control-stack-pointer-valid-p lisp-ocfp)
(ra-pointer-valid-p lisp-ra))
;; The lisp convention is looking good.
#+nil (format t "*C lisp-ocfp ~S ~S~%" lisp-ocfp lisp-ra)
(values lisp-ra lisp-ocfp))
- ((and (sap> c-ocfp fp) (cstack-pointer-valid-p c-ocfp)
+ ((and (sap> c-ocfp fp) (control-stack-pointer-valid-p c-ocfp)
#!-linux (ra-pointer-valid-p c-ra))
;; The C convention is looking good.
#+nil (format t "*C c-ocfp ~S ~S~%" c-ocfp c-ra)
frame)))
(bogus-debug-fun
(let ((fp (frame-pointer frame)))
- (when (cstack-pointer-valid-p fp)
+ (when (control-stack-pointer-valid-p fp)
#!+x86
(multiple-value-bind (ra ofp) (x86-call-context fp)
(compute-calling-frame ofp ra frame))
#!-x86
(defun compute-calling-frame (caller lra up-frame)
(declare (type system-area-pointer caller))
- (when (cstack-pointer-valid-p caller)
+ (when (control-stack-pointer-valid-p caller)
(multiple-value-bind (code pc-offset escaped)
(if lra
(multiple-value-bind (word-offset code)
(defun compute-calling-frame (caller ra up-frame)
(declare (type system-area-pointer caller ra))
(/noshow0 "entering COMPUTE-CALLING-FRAME")
- (when (cstack-pointer-valid-p caller)
+ (when (control-stack-pointer-valid-p caller)
(/noshow0 "in WHEN")
;; First check for an escaped frame.
(multiple-value-bind (code pc-offset escaped) (find-escaped-frame caller)
(unless (fill-in-code-location code-location)
;; This check should be unnecessary. We're missing
;; debug info the compiler should have dumped.
- (error "internal error: unknown code location"))
+ (bug "unknown code location"))
(code-location-%tlf-offset code-location))
;; (There used to be more cases back before sbcl-0.7.0,,
;; when we did special tricks to debug the IR1
(unless (fill-in-code-location code-location)
;; This check should be unnecessary. We're missing
;; debug info the compiler should have dumped.
- (error "internal error: unknown code location"))
+ (bug "unknown code location"))
(code-location-%form-number code-location))
;; (There used to be more cases back before sbcl-0.7.0,,
;; when we did special tricks to debug the IR1
((not (fill-in-code-location code-location))
;; This check should be unnecessary. We're missing
;; debug info the compiler should have dumped.
- (error "internal error: unknown code location"))
+ (bug "unknown code location"))
(t
(compiled-code-location-kind code-location)))))
;; (There used to be more cases back before sbcl-0.7.0,,
;;
;; FIXME: This error and comment happen over and over again.
;; Make them a shared function.
- (error "internal error: unknown code location"))
+ (bug "unknown code location"))
(compiled-code-location-%live-set code-location))
(t live-set)))))
(sb!vm:context-float-register
escaped (sb!c:sc-offset-offset sc-offset) 'double-float)
(sb!vm:context-float-register
- escaped (+ (sb!c:sc-offset-offset sc-offset) #!+sparc 2 #-sparc 1)
+ escaped (+ (sb!c:sc-offset-offset sc-offset) #!+sparc 2 #!-sparc 1)
'double-float))
:invalid-value-for-unescaped-register-storage))
#!+long-float
(do ((frame frame (frame-down frame)))
((not frame) nil)
(when (and (compiled-frame-p frame)
- (#-x86 eq #+x86 sap=
+ (#!-x86 eq #!+x86 sap=
lra
(get-context-value frame lra-save-offset lra-sc-offset)))
(return t)))))
;;; breakpoints.
(defun handle-breakpoint-aux (breakpoints data offset component signal-context)
(unless breakpoints
- (error "internal error: breakpoint that nobody wants"))
+ (bug "breakpoint that nobody wants"))
(unless (member data *executing-breakpoint-hooks*)
(let ((*executing-breakpoint-hooks* (cons data
*executing-breakpoint-hooks*)))
(breakpoint-do-displaced-inst signal-context
(breakpoint-data-instruction data))
;; Some platforms have no usable sigreturn() call. If your
- ;; implementation of arch_do_displaced_inst() doesn't sigreturn(),
- ;; add it to this list.
- #!-(or hpux irix x86 alpha)
+ ;; implementation of arch_do_displaced_inst() _does_ sigreturn(),
+ ;; it's polite to warn here
+ #!+(and sparc solaris)
(error "BREAKPOINT-DO-DISPLACED-INST returned?"))))
(defun invoke-breakpoint-hooks (breakpoints component offset)
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff