1.0.30.41: Octets support for ebcdic-us
[sbcl.git] / src / code / debug-int.lisp
index e5dfe62..d02edae 100644 (file)
 (defun fun-word-offset (fun) (fun-word-offset fun))
 
 #!-sb-fluid (declaim (inline control-stack-pointer-valid-p))
-(defun control-stack-pointer-valid-p (x)
+(defun control-stack-pointer-valid-p (x &optional (aligned t))
   (declare (type system-area-pointer x))
   (let* (#!-stack-grows-downward-not-upward
          (control-stack-start
     #!-stack-grows-downward-not-upward
     (and (sap< x (current-sp))
          (sap<= control-stack-start x)
-         (zerop (logand (sap-int x) sb!vm:fixnum-tag-mask)))
+         (or (not aligned) (zerop (logand (sap-int x) sb!vm:fixnum-tag-mask))))
     #!+stack-grows-downward-not-upward
     (and (sap>= x (current-sp))
          (sap> control-stack-end x)
-         (zerop (logand (sap-int x) sb!vm:fixnum-tag-mask)))))
+         (or (not aligned) (zerop (logand (sap-int x) sb!vm:fixnum-tag-mask))))))
 
 (declaim (inline component-ptr-from-pc))
 (sb!alien:define-alien-routine component-ptr-from-pc (system-area-pointer)
                             (- (get-lisp-obj-address code)
                                sb!vm:other-pointer-lowtag)
                             code-header-len)))
-;        (format t "c-lra-fpc ~A ~A ~A~%" pc code pc-offset)
+         ;;(format t "c-lra-fpc ~A ~A ~A~%" pc code pc-offset)
          (values pc-offset code)))))
 
 #!+(or x86 x86-64)
 (declaim (maybe-inline x86-call-context))
 (defun x86-call-context (fp)
   (declare (type system-area-pointer fp))
-  (labels ((fail ()
-             (values nil
-                     (int-sap 0)
-                     (int-sap 0)))
-           (handle (fp)
-             (cond
-               ((not (control-stack-pointer-valid-p fp))
-                (fail))
-               (t
-                ;; Check the two possible frame pointers.
-                (let ((lisp-ocfp (sap-ref-sap fp (- (* (1+ ocfp-save-offset)
-                                                       sb!vm::n-word-bytes))))
-                      (lisp-ra (sap-ref-sap fp (- (* (1+ return-pc-save-offset)
-                                                     sb!vm::n-word-bytes))))
-                      (c-ocfp (sap-ref-sap fp (* 0 sb!vm:n-word-bytes)))
-                      (c-ra (sap-ref-sap fp (* 1 sb!vm:n-word-bytes))))
-                  (cond ((and (sap> lisp-ocfp fp)
-                              (control-stack-pointer-valid-p lisp-ocfp)
-                              (ra-pointer-valid-p lisp-ra)
-                              (sap> c-ocfp fp)
-                              (control-stack-pointer-valid-p c-ocfp)
-                              (ra-pointer-valid-p c-ra))
-                         ;; Look forward another step to check their validity.
-                         (let ((lisp-ok (handle lisp-ocfp))
-                               (c-ok (handle c-ocfp)))
-                           (cond ((and lisp-ok c-ok)
-                                  ;; Both still seem valid - choose the lisp frame.
-                                  #!+freebsd
-                                  (if (sap> lisp-ocfp c-ocfp)
-                                      (values t lisp-ra lisp-ocfp)
-                                      (values t c-ra c-ocfp))
-                                  #!-freebsd
-                                  (values t lisp-ra lisp-ocfp))
-                                 (lisp-ok
-                                  ;; The lisp convention is looking good.
-                                  (values t lisp-ra lisp-ocfp))
-                                 (c-ok
-                                  ;; The C convention is looking good.
-                                  (values t c-ra c-ocfp))
-                                 (t
-                                  ;; Neither seems right?
-                                  (fail)))))
-                        ((and (sap> lisp-ocfp fp)
-                              (control-stack-pointer-valid-p lisp-ocfp)
-                              (ra-pointer-valid-p lisp-ra))
-                         ;; The lisp convention is looking good.
-                         (values t lisp-ra lisp-ocfp))
-                        ((and (sap> c-ocfp fp)
-                              (control-stack-pointer-valid-p c-ocfp)
-                              #!-linux (ra-pointer-valid-p c-ra))
-                         ;; The C convention is looking good.
-                         (values t c-ra c-ocfp))
-                        (t
-                         (fail))))))))
-    (handle fp)))
+  (let ((ocfp (sap-ref-sap fp (sb!vm::frame-byte-offset ocfp-save-offset)))
+        (ra (sap-ref-sap fp (sb!vm::frame-byte-offset return-pc-save-offset))))
+    (if (and (control-stack-pointer-valid-p fp)
+             (sap> ocfp fp)
+             (control-stack-pointer-valid-p ocfp)
+             (ra-pointer-valid-p ra))
+        (values t ra ocfp)
+        (values nil (int-sap 0) (int-sap 0)))))
 
 ) ; #+x86 PROGN
 \f
           (#.ocfp-save-offset
            (stack-ref pointer stack-slot))
           (#.lra-save-offset
-           (sap-ref-sap pointer (- (* (1+ stack-slot)
-                                      sb!vm::n-word-bytes))))))))
+           (sap-ref-sap pointer (sb!vm::frame-byte-offset stack-slot)))))))
 
 (defun (setf get-context-value) (value frame stack-slot loc)
   (declare (type compiled-frame frame) (type unsigned-byte stack-slot)
           (#.ocfp-save-offset
            (setf (stack-ref pointer stack-slot) value))
           (#.lra-save-offset
-           (setf (sap-ref-sap pointer (- (* (1+ stack-slot)
-                                            sb!vm::n-word-bytes))) value))))))
+           (setf (sap-ref-sap pointer (sb!vm::frame-byte-offset stack-slot))
+                 value))))))
 
 (defun foreign-function-backtrace-name (sap)
   (let ((name (sap-foreign-symbol sap)))
@@ -1254,35 +1206,30 @@ register."
 ;;; Return a DEBUG-FUN that represents debug information for FUN.
 (defun fun-debug-fun (fun)
   (declare (type function fun))
-  (ecase (widetag-of fun)
-    (#.sb!vm:closure-header-widetag
-     (fun-debug-fun (%closure-fun fun)))
-    (#.sb!vm:funcallable-instance-header-widetag
-     (fun-debug-fun (funcallable-instance-fun fun)))
-    (#.sb!vm:simple-fun-header-widetag
-      (let* ((name (%simple-fun-name fun))
-             (component (fun-code-header fun))
-             (res (find-if
-                   (lambda (x)
-                     (and (sb!c::compiled-debug-fun-p x)
-                          (eq (sb!c::compiled-debug-fun-name x) name)
-                          (eq (sb!c::compiled-debug-fun-kind x) nil)))
-                   (sb!c::compiled-debug-info-fun-map
-                    (%code-debug-info component)))))
-        (if res
-            (make-compiled-debug-fun res component)
-            ;; KLUDGE: comment from CMU CL:
-            ;;   This used to be the non-interpreted branch, but
-            ;;   William wrote it to return the debug-fun of fun's XEP
-            ;;   instead of fun's debug-fun. The above code does this
-            ;;   more correctly, but it doesn't get or eliminate all
-            ;;   appropriate cases. It mostly works, and probably
-            ;;   works for all named functions anyway.
-            ;; -- WHN 20000120
-            (debug-fun-from-pc component
-                               (* (- (fun-word-offset fun)
-                                     (get-header-data component))
-                                  sb!vm:n-word-bytes)))))))
+  (let ((simple-fun (%fun-fun fun)))
+    (let* ((name (%simple-fun-name simple-fun))
+           (component (fun-code-header simple-fun))
+           (res (find-if
+                 (lambda (x)
+                   (and (sb!c::compiled-debug-fun-p x)
+                        (eq (sb!c::compiled-debug-fun-name x) name)
+                        (eq (sb!c::compiled-debug-fun-kind x) nil)))
+                 (sb!c::compiled-debug-info-fun-map
+                  (%code-debug-info component)))))
+      (if res
+          (make-compiled-debug-fun res component)
+          ;; KLUDGE: comment from CMU CL:
+          ;;   This used to be the non-interpreted branch, but
+          ;;   William wrote it to return the debug-fun of fun's XEP
+          ;;   instead of fun's debug-fun. The above code does this
+          ;;   more correctly, but it doesn't get or eliminate all
+          ;;   appropriate cases. It mostly works, and probably
+          ;;   works for all named functions anyway.
+          ;; -- WHN 20000120
+          (debug-fun-from-pc component
+                             (* (- (fun-word-offset simple-fun)
+                                   (get-header-data component))
+                                sb!vm:n-word-bytes))))))
 
 ;;; Return the kind of the function, which is one of :OPTIONAL,
 ;;; :EXTERNAL, :TOPLEVEL, :CLEANUP, or NIL.
@@ -2102,8 +2049,9 @@ register."
                   ,@body))
              (stack-frame-offset (data-width offset)
                #!+(or x86 x86-64)
-               `(- (* (+ (sb!c:sc-offset-offset sc-offset) ,data-width ,offset)
-                      sb!vm:n-word-bytes))
+               `(sb!vm::frame-byte-offset (+ (sb!c:sc-offset-offset sc-offset)
+                                           (1- ,data-width)
+                                           ,offset))
                #!-(or x86 x86-64)
                (declare (ignore data-width))
                #!-(or x86 x86-64)
@@ -2289,8 +2237,9 @@ register."
                   ,@body))
              (stack-frame-offset (data-width offset)
                #!+(or x86 x86-64)
-               `(- (* (+ (sb!c:sc-offset-offset sc-offset) ,data-width ,offset)
-                      sb!vm:n-word-bytes))
+               `(sb!vm::frame-byte-offset (+ (sb!c:sc-offset-offset sc-offset)
+                                           (1- ,data-width)
+                                           ,offset))
                #!-(or x86 x86-64)
                (declare (ignore data-width))
                #!-(or x86 x86-64)
@@ -2611,6 +2560,15 @@ register."
             (debug-signal 'frame-fun-mismatch
                           :code-location loc :form form :frame frame))
           (funcall res frame))))))
+
+;;; EVAL-IN-FRAME
+
+(defun eval-in-frame (frame form)
+  (declare (type frame frame))
+  #!+sb-doc
+  "Evaluate FORM in the lexical context of FRAME's current code location,
+   returning the results of the evaluation."
+  (funcall (preprocess-for-eval form (frame-code-location frame)) frame))
 \f
 ;;;; breakpoints