0.9.2.43:

[sbcl.git] / src / code / defbangconstant.lisp

diff --git a/src/code/defbangconstant.lisp b/src/code/defbangconstant.lisp
index fefa23a..9c5d0e7 100644 (file)
--- a/src/code/defbangconstant.lisp
+++ b/src/code/defbangconstant.lisp
@@ -29,12 +29,12 @@
      (defconstant ,@(cdr whole))
      #+sb-xc-host
      ,(unless (eql (find-symbol (symbol-name name) :cl) name)
-       `(defconstant ,@(cdr whole)))
-     #+sb-xc-host 
+        `(defconstant ,@(cdr whole)))
+     #+sb-xc-host
      ,(let ((form `(sb!xc:defconstant ,@(cdr whole))))
-       (if (boundp '*delayed-def!constants*)
-           `(push ',form *delayed-def!constants*)
-           form))))
+        (if (boundp '*delayed-def!constants*)
+            `(push ',form *delayed-def!constants*)
+            form))))
 
 ;;; machinery to implement DEF!CONSTANT delays
 #+sb-xc-host
@@ -44,12 +44,12 @@
   (/show "done binding *DELAYED-DEF!CONSTANTS*")
   (defun force-delayed-def!constants ()
     (if (boundp '*delayed-def!constants*)
-       (progn
-         (mapc #'eval *delayed-def!constants*)
-         (makunbound '*delayed-def!constants*))
-       ;; This condition is probably harmless if it comes up when
-       ;; interactively experimenting with the system by loading a
-       ;; source file into it more than once. But it's worth warning
-       ;; about it because it definitely shouldn't come up in an
-       ;; ordinary build process.
-       (warn "*DELAYED-DEF!CONSTANTS* is already unbound."))))
+        (progn
+          (mapc #'eval *delayed-def!constants*)
+          (makunbound '*delayed-def!constants*))
+        ;; This condition is probably harmless if it comes up when
+        ;; interactively experimenting with the system by loading a
+        ;; source file into it more than once. But it's worth warning
+        ;; about it because it definitely shouldn't come up in an
+        ;; ordinary build process.
+        (warn "*DELAYED-DEF!CONSTANTS* is already unbound."))))