"1.0.41.2": threads: Add memory-barrier framework.

[sbcl.git] / src / code / defboot.lisp

diff --git a/src/code/defboot.lisp b/src/code/defboot.lisp
index 291d73d..4147b0e 100644 (file)
--- a/src/code/defboot.lisp
+++ b/src/code/defboot.lisp
@@ -231,18 +231,9 @@ evaluated as a PROGN."
 
   (sb!c::note-name-defined name :function)
 
-  ;; FIXME: I want to do this here (and fix bug 137), but until the
-  ;; breathtaking CMU CL function name architecture is converted into
-  ;; something sane, (1) doing so doesn't really fix the bug, and
-  ;; (2) doing probably isn't even really safe.
-  #+nil (setf (%fun-name def) name)
-
   (when doc
-    (setf (fdocumentation name 'function) doc)
-    #!+sb-eval
-    (when (typep def 'sb!eval:interpreted-function)
-      (setf (sb!eval:interpreted-function-documentation def)
-            doc)))
+    (setf (%fun-doc def) doc))
+
   name)
 \f
 ;;;; DEFVAR and DEFPARAMETER
@@ -617,9 +608,7 @@ evaluated as a PROGN."
               (cons (list ,@(mapcar (lambda (x) `(cons ',(car x) ,(cadr x)))
                                     mapped-bindings))
                     *handler-clusters*)))
-         ;; KLUDGE: Only on platforms with DX FIXED-ALLOC. FIXME: Add a
-         ;; feature for that, so we can conditionalize on it neatly.
-         #!+(or hppa mips x86 x86-64)
+         #!+stack-allocatable-fixed-objects
          (declare (truly-dynamic-extent *handler-clusters*))
          (progn ,form)))))