`(let ((,(car vars) ,value-form))
,@body)
(let ((ignore (gensym)))
- `(multiple-value-call #'(lambda (&optional ,@vars &rest ,ignore)
+ `(multiple-value-call #'(lambda (&optional ,@(mapcar #'list vars)
+ &rest ,ignore)
(declare (ignore ,ignore))
,@body)
,value-form)))
(error "Vars is not a list of symbols: ~S" vars)))
(defmacro-mundanely multiple-value-setq (vars value-form)
- (cond ((null vars)
- ;; The ANSI spec says that the primary value of VALUE-FORM must be
- ;; returned. The general-case-handling code below doesn't do this
- ;; correctly in the special case when there are no vars bound, so we
- ;; handle this special case separately here.
- (let ((g (gensym)))
- `(multiple-value-bind (,g) ,value-form
- ,g)))
- ((list-of-symbols-p vars)
- (let ((temps (make-gensym-list (length vars))))
- `(multiple-value-bind ,temps ,value-form
- ,@(mapcar #'(lambda (var temp)
- `(setq ,var ,temp))
- vars temps)
- ,(car temps))))
- (t (error "Vars is not a list of symbols: ~S" vars))))
+ (unless (list-of-symbols-p vars)
+ (error "Vars is not a list of symbols: ~S" vars))
+ `(values (setf (values ,@vars) ,value-form)))
(defmacro-mundanely multiple-value-list (value-form)
`(multiple-value-call #'list ,value-form))
;;; COND defined in terms of IF
(defmacro-mundanely cond (&rest clauses)
(if (endp clauses)
- nil
- (let ((clause (first clauses)))
- (if (atom clause)
- (error "Cond clause is not a list: ~S" clause)
- (let ((test (first clause))
- (forms (rest clause)))
- (if (endp forms)
- (let ((n-result (gensym)))
- `(let ((,n-result ,test))
- (if ,n-result
- ,n-result
- (cond ,@(rest clauses)))))
- `(if ,test
- (progn ,@forms)
- (cond ,@(rest clauses)))))))))
+ nil
+ (let ((clause (first clauses)))
+ (if (atom clause)
+ (error "COND clause is not a list: ~S" clause)
+ (let ((test (first clause))
+ (forms (rest clause)))
+ (if (endp forms)
+ (let ((n-result (gensym)))
+ `(let ((,n-result ,test))
+ (if ,n-result
+ ,n-result
+ (cond ,@(rest clauses)))))
+ `(if ,test
+ (progn ,@forms)
+ (cond ,@(rest clauses)))))))))
;;; other things defined in terms of COND
(defmacro-mundanely when (test &body forms)
\f
;;;; various sequencing constructs
-(defmacro-mundanely prog (varlist &body body-decls)
- (multiple-value-bind (body decls) (parse-body body-decls nil)
- `(block nil
- (let ,varlist
- ,@decls
- (tagbody ,@body)))))
-
-(defmacro-mundanely prog* (varlist &body body-decls)
- (multiple-value-bind (body decls) (parse-body body-decls nil)
- `(block nil
- (let* ,varlist
- ,@decls
- (tagbody ,@body)))))
+(flet ((prog-expansion-from-let (varlist body-decls let)
+ (multiple-value-bind (body decls)
+ (parse-body body-decls :doc-string-allowed nil)
+ `(block nil
+ (,let ,varlist
+ ,@decls
+ (tagbody ,@body))))))
+ (defmacro-mundanely prog (varlist &body body-decls)
+ (prog-expansion-from-let varlist body-decls 'let))
+ (defmacro-mundanely prog* (varlist &body body-decls)
+ (prog-expansion-from-let varlist body-decls 'let*)))
(defmacro-mundanely prog1 (result &body body)
(let ((n-result (gensym)))
(defmacro-mundanely prog2 (form1 result &body body)
`(prog1 (progn ,form1 ,result) ,@body))
\f
-;;; Now that we have the definition of MULTIPLE-VALUE-BIND, we can make a
-;;; reasonably readable definition of DEFUN.
-;;;
-;;; DEFUN expands into %DEFUN which is a function that is treated
-;;; magically by the compiler (through an IR1 transform) in order to
-;;; handle stuff like inlining. After the compiler has gotten the
-;;; information it wants out of macro definition, it compiles a call
-;;; to %%DEFUN which happens at load time.
-(defmacro-mundanely defun (&whole whole name args &body body)
+;;;; DEFUN
+
+;;; Should we save the inline expansion of the function named NAME?
+(defun inline-fun-name-p (name)
+ (or
+ ;; the normal reason for saving the inline expansion
+ (info :function :inlinep name)
+ ;; another reason for saving the inline expansion: If the
+ ;; ANSI-recommended idiom
+ ;; (DECLAIM (INLINE FOO))
+ ;; (DEFUN FOO ..)
+ ;; (DECLAIM (NOTINLINE FOO))
+ ;; has been used, and then we later do another
+ ;; (DEFUN FOO ..)
+ ;; without a preceding
+ ;; (DECLAIM (INLINE FOO))
+ ;; what should we do with the old inline expansion when we see the
+ ;; new DEFUN? Overwriting it with the new definition seems like
+ ;; the only unsurprising choice.
+ (info :function :inline-expansion-designator name)))
+
+(defmacro-mundanely defun (&environment env name args &body body)
+ "Define a function at top level."
+ #+sb-xc-host
+ (unless (symbol-package (fun-name-block-name name))
+ (warn "DEFUN of uninterned function name ~S (tricky for GENESIS)" name))
(multiple-value-bind (forms decls doc) (parse-body body)
- (let ((def `(lambda ,args
- ,@decls
- (block ,(function-name-block-name name)
- ,@forms))))
- `(sb!c::%defun ',name #',def ,doc ',whole))))
-#+sb-xc-host (/show "before PROCLAIM" (sb!c::info :function :kind 'sb!c::%%defun))
-#+sb-xc-host (sb!xc:proclaim '(ftype function sb!c::%%defun)) ; to avoid
- ; undefined function warnings
-#+sb-xc-host (/show "after PROCLAIM" (sb!c::info :function :kind 'sb!c::%%defun))
-(defun sb!c::%%defun (name def doc &optional inline-expansion)
+ (let* (;; stuff shared between LAMBDA and INLINE-LAMBDA and NAMED-LAMBDA
+ (lambda-guts `(,args
+ ,@decls
+ (block ,(fun-name-block-name name)
+ ,@forms)))
+ (lambda `(lambda ,@lambda-guts))
+ #-sb-xc-host
+ (named-lambda `(named-lambda ,name ,@lambda-guts))
+ (inline-lambda
+ (when (inline-fun-name-p name)
+ ;; we want to attempt to inline, so complain if we can't
+ (or (sb!c:maybe-inline-syntactic-closure lambda env)
+ (progn
+ (#+sb-xc-host warn
+ #-sb-xc-host sb!c:maybe-compiler-notify
+ "lexical environment too hairy, can't inline DEFUN ~S"
+ name)
+ nil)))))
+ `(progn
+ ;; In cross-compilation of toplevel DEFUNs, we arrange for
+ ;; the LAMBDA to be statically linked by GENESIS.
+ ;;
+ ;; It may seem strangely inconsistent not to use NAMED-LAMBDA
+ ;; here instead of LAMBDA. The reason is historical:
+ ;; COLD-FSET was written before NAMED-LAMBDA, and has special
+ ;; logic of its own to notify the compiler about NAME.
+ #+sb-xc-host
+ (cold-fset ,name ,lambda)
+
+ (eval-when (:compile-toplevel)
+ (sb!c:%compiler-defun ',name ',inline-lambda t))
+ (eval-when (:load-toplevel :execute)
+ (%defun ',name
+ ;; In normal compilation (not for cold load) this is
+ ;; where the compiled LAMBDA first appears. In
+ ;; cross-compilation, we manipulate the
+ ;; previously-statically-linked LAMBDA here.
+ #-sb-xc-host ,named-lambda
+ #+sb-xc-host (fdefinition ',name)
+ ,doc
+ ',inline-lambda))))))
+
+#-sb-xc-host
+(defun %defun (name def doc inline-lambda)
+ (declare (type function def))
+ (declare (type (or null simple-string) doc))
+ (aver (legal-fun-name-p name)) ; should've been checked by DEFMACRO DEFUN
+ (sb!c:%compiler-defun name inline-lambda nil)
(when (fboundp name)
+ (/show0 "redefining NAME in %DEFUN")
(style-warn "redefining ~S in DEFUN" name))
(setf (sb!xc:fdefinition name) def)
+
+ ;; FIXME: I want to do this here (and fix bug 137), but until the
+ ;; breathtaking CMU CL function name architecture is converted into
+ ;; something sane, (1) doing so doesn't really fix the bug, and
+ ;; (2) doing probably isn't even really safe.
+ #+nil (setf (%fun-name def) name)
+
(when doc
- ;; FIXME: This should use shared SETF-name parsing logic.
- (if (and (consp name) (eq (first name) 'setf))
- (setf (fdocumentation (second name) 'setf) doc)
- (setf (fdocumentation name 'function) doc)))
- (become-defined-function-name name)
- (when (or inline-expansion
- (info :function :inline-expansion name))
- (setf (info :function :inline-expansion name)
- inline-expansion))
+ (setf (fdocumentation name 'function) doc))
name)
-;;; Ordinarily this definition of SB!C:%DEFUN as an ordinary function is not
-;;; used: the parallel (but different) definition as an IR1 transform takes
-;;; precedence. However, it's still good to define this in order to keep the
-;;; interpreter happy. We define it here (instead of alongside the parallel
-;;; IR1 transform) because while the IR1 transform is needed and appropriate
-;;; in the cross-compiler running in the host Common Lisp, this parallel
-;;; ordinary function definition is only appropriate in the target Lisp.
-(defun sb!c::%defun (name def doc source)
- (declare (ignore source))
- (setf (sb!eval:interpreted-function-name def) name)
- (ecase (info :function :where-from name)
- (:assumed
- (setf (info :function :where-from name) :defined)
- (setf (info :function :type name)
- (extract-function-type def))
- (when (info :function :assumed-type name)
- (setf (info :function :assumed-type name) nil)))
- (:declared)
- (:defined
- (setf (info :function :type name)
- (extract-function-type def))
- ;; We shouldn't need to clear this here because it should be clear
- ;; already (cleared when the last definition was processed).
- (aver (null (info :function :assumed-type name)))))
- (sb!c::%%defun name def doc))
\f
;;;; DEFVAR and DEFPARAMETER
(defmacro-mundanely defvar (var &optional (val nil valp) (doc nil docp))
#!+sb-doc
- "For defining global variables at top level. Declares the variable
- SPECIAL and, optionally, initializes it. If the variable already has a
+ "Define a global variable at top level. Declare the variable
+ SPECIAL and, optionally, initialize it. If the variable already has a
value, the old value is not clobbered. The third argument is an optional
documentation string for the variable."
`(progn
- (declaim (special ,var))
- ,@(when valp
- `((unless (boundp ',var)
- (setq ,var ,val))))
- ,@(when docp
- `((funcall #'(setf fdocumentation) ',doc ',var 'variable)))
- ',var))
+ (eval-when (:compile-toplevel)
+ (%compiler-defvar ',var))
+ (eval-when (:load-toplevel :execute)
+ (%defvar ',var (unless (boundp ',var) ,val) ',valp ,doc ',docp))))
(defmacro-mundanely defparameter (var val &optional (doc nil docp))
#!+sb-doc
- "Defines a parameter that is not normally changed by the program,
- but that may be changed without causing an error. Declares the
- variable special and sets its value to VAL. The third argument is
- an optional documentation string for the parameter."
+ "Define a parameter that is not normally changed by the program,
+ but that may be changed without causing an error. Declare the
+ variable special and sets its value to VAL, overwriting any
+ previous value. The third argument is an optional documentation
+ string for the parameter."
`(progn
- (declaim (special ,var))
- (setq ,var ,val)
- ,@(when docp
- ;; FIXME: The various FUNCALL #'(SETF FDOCUMENTATION) and
- ;; other FUNCALL #'(SETF FOO) forms in the code should
- ;; unbogobootstrapized back to ordinary SETF forms.
- `((funcall #'(setf fdocumentation) ',doc ',var 'variable)))
- ',var))
+ (eval-when (:compile-toplevel)
+ (%compiler-defvar ',var))
+ (eval-when (:load-toplevel :execute)
+ (%defparameter ',var ,val ,doc ',docp))))
+
+(defun %compiler-defvar (var)
+ (sb!xc:proclaim `(special ,var)))
+
+#-sb-xc-host
+(defun %defvar (var val valp doc docp)
+ (%compiler-defvar var)
+ (when valp
+ (unless (boundp var)
+ (set var val)))
+ (when docp
+ (setf (fdocumentation var 'variable) doc))
+ var)
+
+#-sb-xc-host
+(defun %defparameter (var val doc docp)
+ (%compiler-defvar var)
+ (set var val)
+ (when docp
+ (setf (fdocumentation var 'variable) doc))
+ var)
\f
;;;; iteration constructs
-;;; (These macros are defined in terms of a function DO-DO-BODY which is also
-;;; used by SB!INT:DO-ANONYMOUS. Since these macros should not be loaded
-;;; on the cross-compilation host, but SB!INT:DO-ANONYMOUS and DO-DO-BODY
-;;; should be, these macros can't conveniently be in the same file as
-;;; DO-DO-BODY.)
+;;; (These macros are defined in terms of a function FROB-DO-BODY which
+;;; is also used by SB!INT:DO-ANONYMOUS. Since these macros should not
+;;; be loaded on the cross-compilation host, but SB!INT:DO-ANONYMOUS
+;;; and FROB-DO-BODY should be, these macros can't conveniently be in
+;;; the same file as FROB-DO-BODY.)
(defmacro-mundanely do (varlist endlist &body body)
#!+sb-doc
"DO ({(Var [Init] [Step])}*) (Test Exit-Form*) Declaration* Form*
are evaluated as a PROGN, with the result being the value of the DO. A block
named NIL is established around the entire expansion, allowing RETURN to be
used as an alternate exit mechanism."
- (do-do-body varlist endlist body 'let 'psetq 'do nil))
+ (frob-do-body varlist endlist body 'let 'psetq 'do nil))
(defmacro-mundanely do* (varlist endlist &body body)
#!+sb-doc
"DO* ({(Var [Init] [Step])}*) (Test Exit-Form*) Declaration* Form*
the Exit-Forms are evaluated as a PROGN, with the result being the value
of the DO. A block named NIL is established around the entire expansion,
allowing RETURN to be used as an laternate exit mechanism."
- (do-do-body varlist endlist body 'let* 'setq 'do* nil))
-
-;;; DOTIMES and DOLIST could be defined more concisely using destructuring
-;;; macro lambda lists or DESTRUCTURING-BIND, but then it'd be tricky to use
-;;; them before those things were defined. They're used enough times before
-;;; destructuring mechanisms are defined that it looks as though it's worth
-;;; just implementing them ASAP, at the cost of being unable to use the
-;;; standard destructuring mechanisms.
-(defmacro-mundanely dotimes (var-count-result &body body)
- (multiple-value-bind ; to roll our own destructuring
- (var count result)
- (apply (lambda (var count &optional (result nil))
- (values var count result))
- var-count-result)
- (cond ((numberp count)
- `(do ((,var 0 (1+ ,var)))
- ((>= ,var ,count) ,result)
- (declare (type unsigned-byte ,var))
- ,@body))
- (t (let ((v1 (gensym)))
- `(do ((,var 0 (1+ ,var)) (,v1 ,count))
- ((>= ,var ,v1) ,result)
- (declare (type unsigned-byte ,var))
- ,@body))))))
-(defmacro-mundanely dolist (var-list-result &body body)
- (multiple-value-bind ; to roll our own destructuring
- (var list result)
- (apply (lambda (var list &optional (result nil))
- (values var list result))
- var-list-result)
- ;; We repeatedly bind the var instead of setting it so that we never have
- ;; to give the var an arbitrary value such as NIL (which might conflict
- ;; with a declaration). If there is a result form, we introduce a
- ;; gratuitous binding of the variable to NIL w/o the declarations, then
- ;; evaluate the result form in that environment. We spuriously reference
- ;; the gratuitous variable, since we don't want to use IGNORABLE on what
- ;; might be a special var.
- (let ((n-list (gensym)))
- `(do ((,n-list ,list (cdr ,n-list)))
- ((endp ,n-list)
- ,@(if result
- `((let ((,var nil))
- ,var
- ,result))
- '(nil)))
- (let ((,var (car ,n-list)))
- ,@body)))))
+ (frob-do-body varlist endlist body 'let* 'setq 'do* nil))
+
+;;; DOTIMES and DOLIST could be defined more concisely using
+;;; destructuring macro lambda lists or DESTRUCTURING-BIND, but then
+;;; it'd be tricky to use them before those things were defined.
+;;; They're used enough times before destructuring mechanisms are
+;;; defined that it looks as though it's worth just implementing them
+;;; ASAP, at the cost of being unable to use the standard
+;;; destructuring mechanisms.
+(defmacro-mundanely dotimes ((var count &optional (result nil)) &body body)
+ (cond ((numberp count)
+ `(do ((,var 0 (1+ ,var)))
+ ((>= ,var ,count) ,result)
+ (declare (type unsigned-byte ,var))
+ ,@body))
+ (t (let ((v1 (gensym)))
+ `(do ((,var 0 (1+ ,var)) (,v1 ,count))
+ ((>= ,var ,v1) ,result)
+ (declare (type unsigned-byte ,var))
+ ,@body)))))
+
+(defmacro-mundanely dolist ((var list &optional (result nil)) &body body)
+ ;; We repeatedly bind the var instead of setting it so that we never
+ ;; have to give the var an arbitrary value such as NIL (which might
+ ;; conflict with a declaration). If there is a result form, we
+ ;; introduce a gratuitous binding of the variable to NIL without the
+ ;; declarations, then evaluate the result form in that
+ ;; environment. We spuriously reference the gratuitous variable,
+ ;; since we don't want to use IGNORABLE on what might be a special
+ ;; var.
+ (multiple-value-bind (forms decls) (parse-body body :doc-string-allowed nil)
+ (let ((n-list (gensym "N-LIST"))
+ (start (gensym "START")))
+ `(block nil
+ (let ((,n-list ,list))
+ (tagbody
+ ,start
+ (unless (endp ,n-list)
+ (let ((,var (car ,n-list)))
+ ,@decls
+ (setq ,n-list (cdr ,n-list))
+ (tagbody ,@forms))
+ (go ,start))))
+ ,(if result
+ `(let ((,var nil))
+ ,var
+ ,result)
+ nil)))))
+\f
+;;;; conditions, handlers, restarts
+
+;;; KLUDGE: we PROCLAIM these special here so that we can use restart
+;;; macros in the compiler before the DEFVARs are compiled.
+(sb!xc:proclaim
+ '(special *handler-clusters* *restart-clusters* *condition-restarts*))
+
+(defmacro-mundanely with-condition-restarts
+ (condition-form restarts-form &body body)
+ #!+sb-doc
+ "Evaluates the BODY in a dynamic environment where the restarts in the list
+ RESTARTS-FORM are associated with the condition returned by CONDITION-FORM.
+ This allows FIND-RESTART, etc., to recognize restarts that are not related
+ to the error currently being debugged. See also RESTART-CASE."
+ (let ((n-cond (gensym)))
+ `(let ((*condition-restarts*
+ (cons (let ((,n-cond ,condition-form))
+ (cons ,n-cond
+ (append ,restarts-form
+ (cdr (assoc ,n-cond *condition-restarts*)))))
+ *condition-restarts*)))
+ ,@body)))
+
+(defmacro-mundanely restart-bind (bindings &body forms)
+ #!+sb-doc
+ "Executes forms in a dynamic context where the given restart bindings are
+ in effect. Users probably want to use RESTART-CASE. When clauses contain
+ the same restart name, FIND-RESTART will find the first such clause."
+ `(let ((*restart-clusters*
+ (cons (list
+ ,@(mapcar (lambda (binding)
+ (unless (or (car binding)
+ (member :report-function
+ binding
+ :test #'eq))
+ (warn "Unnamed restart does not have a ~
+ report function: ~S"
+ binding))
+ `(make-restart :name ',(car binding)
+ :function ,(cadr binding)
+ ,@(cddr binding)))
+ bindings))
+ *restart-clusters*)))
+ ,@forms))
+
+;;; Wrap the RESTART-CASE expression in a WITH-CONDITION-RESTARTS if
+;;; appropriate. Gross, but it's what the book seems to say...
+(defun munge-restart-case-expression (expression env)
+ (let ((exp (sb!xc:macroexpand expression env)))
+ (if (consp exp)
+ (let* ((name (car exp))
+ (args (if (eq name 'cerror) (cddr exp) (cdr exp))))
+ (if (member name '(signal error cerror warn))
+ (once-only ((n-cond `(coerce-to-condition
+ ,(first args)
+ (list ,@(rest args))
+ ',(case name
+ (warn 'simple-warning)
+ (signal 'simple-condition)
+ (t 'simple-error))
+ ',name)))
+ `(with-condition-restarts
+ ,n-cond
+ (car *restart-clusters*)
+ ,(if (eq name 'cerror)
+ `(cerror ,(second exp) ,n-cond)
+ `(,name ,n-cond))))
+ expression))
+ expression)))
+
+;;; FIXME: I did a fair amount of rearrangement of this code in order to
+;;; get WITH-KEYWORD-PAIRS to work cleanly. This code should be tested..
+(defmacro-mundanely restart-case (expression &body clauses &environment env)
+ #!+sb-doc
+ "(RESTART-CASE form
+ {(case-name arg-list {keyword value}* body)}*)
+ The form is evaluated in a dynamic context where the clauses have special
+ meanings as points to which control may be transferred (see INVOKE-RESTART).
+ When clauses contain the same case-name, FIND-RESTART will find the first
+ such clause. If Expression is a call to SIGNAL, ERROR, CERROR or WARN (or
+ macroexpands into such) then the signalled condition will be associated with
+ the new restarts."
+ (flet ((transform-keywords (&key report interactive test)
+ (let ((result '()))
+ (when report
+ (setq result (list* (if (stringp report)
+ `#'(lambda (stream)
+ (write-string ,report stream))
+ `#',report)
+ :report-function
+ result)))
+ (when interactive
+ (setq result (list* `#',interactive
+ :interactive-function
+ result)))
+ (when test
+ (setq result (list* `#',test :test-function result)))
+ (nreverse result)))
+ (parse-keyword-pairs (list keys)
+ (do ((l list (cddr l))
+ (k '() (list* (cadr l) (car l) k)))
+ ((or (null l) (not (member (car l) keys)))
+ (values (nreverse k) l)))))
+ (let ((block-tag (gensym))
+ (temp-var (gensym))
+ (data
+ (macrolet (;; KLUDGE: This started as an old DEFMACRO
+ ;; WITH-KEYWORD-PAIRS general utility, which was used
+ ;; only in this one place in the code. It was translated
+ ;; literally into this MACROLET in order to avoid some
+ ;; cross-compilation bootstrap problems. It would almost
+ ;; certainly be clearer, and it would certainly be more
+ ;; concise, to do a more idiomatic translation, merging
+ ;; this with the TRANSFORM-KEYWORDS logic above.
+ ;; -- WHN 19990925
+ (with-keyword-pairs ((names expression) &body forms)
+ (let ((temp (member '&rest names)))
+ (unless (= (length temp) 2)
+ (error "&REST keyword is ~:[missing~;misplaced~]."
+ temp))
+ (let* ((key-vars (ldiff names temp))
+ (keywords (mapcar #'keywordicate key-vars))
+ (key-var (gensym))
+ (rest-var (cadr temp)))
+ `(multiple-value-bind (,key-var ,rest-var)
+ (parse-keyword-pairs ,expression ',keywords)
+ (let ,(mapcar (lambda (var keyword)
+ `(,var (getf ,key-var
+ ,keyword)))
+ key-vars keywords)
+ ,@forms))))))
+ (mapcar (lambda (clause)
+ (with-keyword-pairs ((report interactive test
+ &rest forms)
+ (cddr clause))
+ (list (car clause) ;name=0
+ (gensym) ;tag=1
+ (transform-keywords :report report ;keywords=2
+ :interactive interactive
+ :test test)
+ (cadr clause) ;bvl=3
+ forms))) ;body=4
+ clauses))))
+ `(block ,block-tag
+ (let ((,temp-var nil))
+ (tagbody
+ (restart-bind
+ ,(mapcar (lambda (datum)
+ (let ((name (nth 0 datum))
+ (tag (nth 1 datum))
+ (keys (nth 2 datum)))
+ `(,name #'(lambda (&rest temp)
+ (setq ,temp-var temp)
+ (go ,tag))
+ ,@keys)))
+ data)
+ (return-from ,block-tag
+ ,(munge-restart-case-expression expression env)))
+ ,@(mapcan (lambda (datum)
+ (let ((tag (nth 1 datum))
+ (bvl (nth 3 datum))
+ (body (nth 4 datum)))
+ (list tag
+ `(return-from ,block-tag
+ (apply (lambda ,bvl ,@body)
+ ,temp-var)))))
+ data)))))))
+
+(defmacro-mundanely with-simple-restart ((restart-name format-string
+ &rest format-arguments)
+ &body forms)
+ #!+sb-doc
+ "(WITH-SIMPLE-RESTART (restart-name format-string format-arguments)
+ body)
+ If restart-name is not invoked, then all values returned by forms are
+ returned. If control is transferred to this restart, it immediately
+ returns the values NIL and T."
+ `(restart-case
+ ;; If there's just one body form, then don't use PROGN. This allows
+ ;; RESTART-CASE to "see" calls to ERROR, etc.
+ ,(if (= (length forms) 1) (car forms) `(progn ,@forms))
+ (,restart-name ()
+ :report (lambda (stream)
+ (format stream ,format-string ,@format-arguments))
+ (values nil t))))
+
+(defmacro-mundanely handler-bind (bindings &body forms)
+ #!+sb-doc
+ "(HANDLER-BIND ( {(type handler)}* ) body)
+ Executes body in a dynamic context where the given handler bindings are
+ in effect. Each handler must take the condition being signalled as an
+ argument. The bindings are searched first to last in the event of a
+ signalled condition."
+ (let ((member-if (member-if (lambda (x)
+ (not (proper-list-of-length-p x 2)))
+ bindings)))
+ (when member-if
+ (error "ill-formed handler binding: ~S" (first member-if))))
+ `(let ((*handler-clusters*
+ (cons (list ,@(mapcar (lambda (x) `(cons ',(car x) ,(cadr x)))
+ bindings))
+ *handler-clusters*)))
+ (multiple-value-prog1
+ (progn
+ ,@forms)
+ ;; Wait for any float exceptions.
+ #!+x86 (float-wait))))
+
+(defmacro-mundanely handler-case (form &rest cases)
+ "(HANDLER-CASE form
+ { (type ([var]) body) }* )
+ Execute FORM in a context with handlers established for the condition
+ types. A peculiar property allows type to be :NO-ERROR. If such a clause
+ occurs, and form returns normally, all its values are passed to this clause
+ as if by MULTIPLE-VALUE-CALL. The :NO-ERROR clause accepts more than one
+ var specification."
+ ;; FIXME: Replacing CADR, CDDDR and friends with DESTRUCTURING-BIND
+ ;; and names for the subexpressions would make it easier to
+ ;; understand the code below.
+ (let ((no-error-clause (assoc ':no-error cases)))
+ (if no-error-clause
+ (let ((normal-return (make-symbol "normal-return"))
+ (error-return (make-symbol "error-return")))
+ `(block ,error-return
+ (multiple-value-call (lambda ,@(cdr no-error-clause))
+ (block ,normal-return
+ (return-from ,error-return
+ (handler-case (return-from ,normal-return ,form)
+ ,@(remove no-error-clause cases)))))))
+ (let ((tag (gensym))
+ (var (gensym))
+ (annotated-cases (mapcar (lambda (case) (cons (gensym) case))
+ cases)))
+ `(block ,tag
+ (let ((,var nil))
+ (declare (ignorable ,var))
+ (tagbody
+ (handler-bind
+ ,(mapcar (lambda (annotated-case)
+ (list (cadr annotated-case)
+ `(lambda (temp)
+ ,(if (caddr annotated-case)
+ `(setq ,var temp)
+ '(declare (ignore temp)))
+ (go ,(car annotated-case)))))
+ annotated-cases)
+ (return-from ,tag
+ #!-x86 ,form
+ #!+x86 (multiple-value-prog1 ,form
+ ;; Need to catch FP errors here!
+ (float-wait))))
+ ,@(mapcan
+ (lambda (annotated-case)
+ (list (car annotated-case)
+ (let ((body (cdddr annotated-case)))
+ `(return-from
+ ,tag
+ ,(cond ((caddr annotated-case)
+ `(let ((,(caaddr annotated-case)
+ ,var))
+ ,@body))
+ (t
+ `(locally ,@body)))))))
+ annotated-cases))))))))
\f
;;;; miscellaneous
(defmacro-mundanely psetq (&rest pairs)
#!+sb-doc
- "SETQ {var value}*
+ "PSETQ {var value}*
Set the variables to the values, like SETQ, except that assignments
happen in parallel, i.e. no assignments take place until all the
forms have been evaluated."
- ;; (This macro is used in the definition of DO, so we can't use DO in the
- ;; definition of this macro without getting into confusing bootstrap issues.)
- (prog ((lets nil)
- (setqs nil)
- (pairs pairs))
- :again
- (when (atom (cdr pairs))
- (return `(let ,(nreverse lets)
- (setq ,@(nreverse setqs))
- nil)))
- (let ((gen (gensym)))
- (setq lets (cons `(,gen ,(cadr pairs)) lets)
- setqs (list* gen (car pairs) setqs)
- pairs (cddr pairs)))
- (go :again)))
+ ;; Given the possibility of symbol-macros, we delegate to PSETF
+ ;; which knows how to deal with them, after checking that syntax is
+ ;; compatible with PSETQ.
+ (do ((pair pairs (cddr pair)))
+ ((endp pair) `(psetf ,@pairs))
+ (unless (symbolp (car pair))
+ (error 'simple-program-error
+ :format-control "variable ~S in PSETQ is not a SYMBOL"
+ :format-arguments (list (car pair))))))
(defmacro-mundanely lambda (&whole whole args &body body)
(declare (ignore args body))
`#',whole)
+
+(defmacro-mundanely named-lambda (&whole whole name args &body body)
+ (declare (ignore name args body))
+ `#',whole)
+
+(defmacro-mundanely lambda-with-lexenv (&whole whole
+ declarations macros symbol-macros
+ &body body)
+ (declare (ignore declarations macros symbol-macros body))
+ `#',whole)
+
+;;; this eliminates a whole bundle of unknown function STYLE-WARNINGs
+;;; when cross-compiling. It's not critical for behaviour, but is
+;;; aesthetically pleasing, except inasmuch as there's this list of
+;;; magic functions here. -- CSR, 2003-04-01
+#+sb-xc-host
+(sb!xc:proclaim '(ftype (function * *)
+ ;; functions appearing in fundamental defining
+ ;; macro expansions:
+ %compiler-deftype
+ %compiler-defvar
+ %defun
+ %defsetf
+ %defparameter
+ %defvar
+ sb!c:%compiler-defun
+ sb!c::%define-symbol-macro
+ sb!c::%defconstant
+ sb!c::%define-compiler-macro
+ sb!c::%defmacro
+ sb!kernel::%compiler-defstruct
+ sb!kernel::%compiler-define-condition
+ sb!kernel::%defstruct
+ sb!kernel::%define-condition
+ ;; miscellaneous functions commonly appearing
+ ;; as a result of macro expansions or compiler
+ ;; transformations:
+ sb!int:find-undeleted-package-or-lose ; IN-PACKAGE
+ sb!kernel::arg-count-error ; PARSE-DEFMACRO
+ ))
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff