;;; versions which break binary compatibility. But it certainly should
;;; be incremented for release versions which break binary
;;; compatibility.
-(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 65)
+(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 66)
;;; (record of versions before 2003 deleted in 2003-04-26/0.pre8.107 or so)
;;; 38: (2003-01-05) changed names of internal SORT machinery
;;; 39: (2003-02-20) in 0.7.12.1 a slot was added to
;;; 64: (2006-03-24) New calling convention for unknown-values on x86 and
;;; x86-64. Also (belatedly) PPC/gencgc, including :gencgc on FPAFF.
;;; 65: (2006-04-11) Package locking interface changed.
+;;; 66: (2006-05-13) Fopcompiler
;;; the conventional file extension for our fasl files
(declaim (type simple-string *fasl-file-type*))