;;; versions which break binary compatibility. But it certainly should
;;; be incremented for release versions which break binary
;;; compatibility.
-(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 56)
+(def!constant +fasl-file-version+ 57)
;;; (record of versions before 2003 deleted in 2003-04-26/0.pre8.107 or so)
;;; 38: (2003-01-05) changed names of internal SORT machinery
;;; 39: (2003-02-20) in 0.7.12.1 a slot was added to
;;; FIND-FOREIGN-SYMBOL-IN-TABLE &co.
;;; 56: (2005-05-22) Something between 0.9.0.1 and 0.9.0.14. My money is
;;; on 0.9.0.6 (MORE CASE CONSISTENCY).
+;;; 57: (2005-06-12) Raw slot rearrangement in 0.9.1.38
;;; the conventional file extension for our fasl files
(declaim (type simple-string *fasl-file-type*))