(in-package "SB!IMPL")
+(defparameter *eval-calls* 0)
+
+(defun !eval-cold-init ()
+ (setf *eval-calls* 0
+ *evaluator-mode* :compile)
+ #!+sb-eval
+ (setf sb!eval::*eval-level* -1
+ sb!eval::*eval-verbose* nil))
+
+(defvar *eval-source-context* nil)
+
+(defvar *eval-tlf-index* nil)
+(defvar *eval-source-info* nil)
+
+;;;; Turns EXPR into a lambda-form we can pass to COMPILE. Returns
+;;;; a secondary value of T if we must call the resulting function
+;;;; to evaluate EXPR -- if EXPR is already a lambda form, there's
+;;;; no need.
+(defun make-eval-lambda (expr)
+ (if (typep expr `(cons (member lambda named-lambda lambda-with-lexenv)))
+ (values expr nil)
+ (values `(lambda ()
+ ;; why PROGN? So that attempts to eval free declarations
+ ;; signal errors rather than return NIL. -- CSR, 2007-05-01
+ (progn ,expr))
+ t)))
+
;;; general case of EVAL (except in that it can't handle toplevel
;;; EVAL-WHEN magic properly): Delegate to #'COMPILE.
-(defun %eval (expr lexenv)
- ;; FIXME: It might be nice to quieten the toplevel by muffling
- ;; warnings generated by this compilation (since we're about to
- ;; execute the results irrespective of the warnings). We might want
- ;; to be careful about not muffling warnings arising from inner
- ;; evaluations/compilations, though [e.g. the ignored variable in
- ;; (DEFUN FOO (X) 1)]. -- CSR, 2003-05-13
- (let ((fun (sb!c:compile-in-lexenv (gensym "EVAL-TMPFUN-")
- `(lambda () ,expr)
- lexenv)))
- (funcall fun)))
+(defun %simple-eval (expr lexenv)
+ (multiple-value-bind (lambda call) (make-eval-lambda expr)
+ (let ((fun
+ ;; This tells the compiler where the lambda comes from, in case it
+ ;; wants to report any problems.
+ (let ((sb!c::*source-form-context-alist*
+ (acons lambda *eval-source-context*
+ sb!c::*source-form-context-alist*)))
+ (handler-bind (;; Compiler notes just clutter up the REPL:
+ ;; anyone caring about performance should not
+ ;; be using EVAL.
+ (compiler-note #'muffle-warning))
+ (sb!c:compile-in-lexenv
+ nil lambda lexenv *eval-source-info* *eval-tlf-index* (not call))))))
+ (declare (function fun))
+ (if call
+ (funcall fun)
+ fun))))
;;; Handle PROGN and implicit PROGN.
-(defun eval-progn-body (progn-body lexenv)
+(defun simple-eval-progn-body (progn-body lexenv)
(unless (list-with-length-p progn-body)
(let ((*print-circle* t))
(error 'simple-program-error
- :format-control
- "~@<not a proper list in PROGN or implicit PROGN: ~2I~_~S~:>"
- :format-arguments (list progn-body))))
+ :format-control
+ "~@<not a proper list in PROGN or implicit PROGN: ~2I~_~S~:>"
+ :format-arguments (list progn-body))))
;; Note:
;; * We can't just use (MAP NIL #'EVAL PROGN-BODY) here, because we
;; need to take care to return all the values of the final EVAL.
;; gives the right result when PROGN-BODY is NIL, because
;; (FIRST NIL) = (REST NIL) = NIL.
(do* ((i progn-body rest-i)
- (rest-i (rest i) (rest i)))
+ (rest-i (rest i) (rest i)))
(nil)
(if rest-i ; if not last element of list
- (eval-in-lexenv (first i) lexenv)
- (return (eval-in-lexenv (first i) lexenv)))))
+ (simple-eval-in-lexenv (first i) lexenv)
+ (return (simple-eval-in-lexenv (first i) lexenv)))))
-(defun eval-locally (exp lexenv &key vars)
+(defun simple-eval-locally (exp lexenv &key vars)
(multiple-value-bind (body decls)
(parse-body (rest exp) :doc-string-allowed nil)
(let ((lexenv
;; then thrown away, as it happens]). -- CSR,
;; 2002-10-24
(let* ((sb!c:*lexenv* lexenv)
- (sb!c::*free-funs* (make-hash-table :test 'equal))
- (sb!c::*free-vars* (make-hash-table :test 'eq))
- (sb!c::*undefined-warnings* nil))
+ (sb!c::*free-funs* (make-hash-table :test 'equal))
+ (sb!c::*free-vars* (make-hash-table :test 'eq))
+ (sb!c::*undefined-warnings* nil))
;; FIXME: VALUES declaration
(sb!c::process-decls decls
vars
nil
- lexenv))))
- (eval-progn-body body lexenv))))
+ :lexenv lexenv
+ :context :eval))))
+ (simple-eval-progn-body body lexenv))))
-(defun eval (original-exp)
- #!+sb-doc
- "Evaluate the argument in a null lexical environment, returning the
- result or results."
- (eval-in-lexenv original-exp (make-null-lexenv)))
+;;;; EVAL-ERROR
+;;;;
+;;;; Analogous to COMPILER-ERROR, but simpler.
+
+(define-condition eval-error (encapsulated-condition)
+ ()
+ (:report (lambda (condition stream)
+ (print-object (encapsulated-condition condition) stream))))
+
+(defun eval-error (condition)
+ (signal 'eval-error :condition condition)
+ (bug "Unhandled EVAL-ERROR"))
;;; Pick off a few easy cases, and the various top level EVAL-WHEN
-;;; magical cases, and call %EVAL for the rest.
-(defun eval-in-lexenv (original-exp lexenv)
+;;; magical cases, and call %SIMPLE-EVAL for the rest.
+(defun simple-eval-in-lexenv (original-exp lexenv)
(declare (optimize (safety 1)))
;; (aver (lexenv-simple-p lexenv))
- (handler-bind
- ((sb!c:compiler-error
- (lambda (c)
- (if (boundp 'sb!c::*compiler-error-bailout*)
- ;; if we're in the compiler, delegate either to a higher
- ;; authority or, if that's us, back down to the
- ;; outermost compiler handler...
- (progn
- (signal c)
- nil)
- ;; ... if we're not in the compiler, better signal the
- ;; error straight away.
- (invoke-restart 'sb!c::signal-error)))))
+ (incf *eval-calls*)
+ (sb!c:with-compiler-error-resignalling
(let ((exp (macroexpand original-exp lexenv)))
- (typecase exp
- (symbol
- (ecase (info :variable :kind exp)
- (:constant
- (values (info :variable :constant-value exp)))
- ((:special :global)
- (symbol-value exp))
- ;; FIXME: This special case here is a symptom of non-ANSI
- ;; weirdness in SBCL's ALIEN implementation, which could
- ;; cause problems for e.g. code walkers. It'd probably be
- ;; good to ANSIfy it by making alien variable accessors
- ;; into ordinary forms, e.g. (SB-UNIX:ENV) and (SETF
- ;; SB-UNIX:ENV), instead of magical symbols, e.g. plain
- ;; SB-UNIX:ENV. Then if the old magical-symbol syntax is to
- ;; be retained for compatibility, it can be implemented
- ;; with DEFINE-SYMBOL-MACRO, keeping the code walkers
- ;; happy.
- (:alien
- (%eval original-exp lexenv))))
- (list
- (let ((name (first exp))
- (n-args (1- (length exp))))
- (case name
- ((function)
- (unless (= n-args 1)
- (error "wrong number of args to FUNCTION:~% ~S" exp))
- (let ((name (second exp)))
- (if (and (legal-fun-name-p name)
- (not (consp (let ((sb!c:*lexenv* lexenv))
- (sb!c:lexenv-find name funs)))))
- (%coerce-name-to-fun name)
- (%eval original-exp lexenv))))
- ((quote)
- (unless (= n-args 1)
- (error "wrong number of args to QUOTE:~% ~S" exp))
- (second exp))
- (setq
- (unless (evenp n-args)
- (error "odd number of args to SETQ:~% ~S" exp))
- (unless (zerop n-args)
- (do ((name (cdr exp) (cddr name)))
- ((null name)
- (do ((args (cdr exp) (cddr args)))
- ((null (cddr args))
- ;; We duplicate the call to SET so that the
- ;; correct value gets returned.
- (set (first args) (eval-in-lexenv (second args) lexenv)))
- (set (first args) (eval-in-lexenv (second args) lexenv))))
- (let ((symbol (first name)))
- (case (info :variable :kind symbol)
- (:special)
- (t (return (%eval original-exp lexenv))))
- (unless (type= (info :variable :type symbol)
- *universal-type*)
- ;; let the compiler deal with type checking
- (return (%eval original-exp lexenv)))))))
- ((progn)
- (eval-progn-body (rest exp) lexenv))
- ((eval-when)
- ;; FIXME: DESTRUCTURING-BIND returns ARG-COUNT-ERROR
- ;; instead of PROGRAM-ERROR when there's something wrong
- ;; with the syntax here (e.g. missing SITUATIONS). This
- ;; could be fixed by hand-crafting clauses to catch and
- ;; report each possibility, but it would probably be
- ;; cleaner to write a new macro
- ;; DESTRUCTURING-BIND-PROGRAM-SYNTAX which does
- ;; DESTRUCTURING-BIND and promotes any mismatch to
- ;; PROGRAM-ERROR, then to use it here and in (probably
- ;; dozens of) other places where the same problem
- ;; arises.
- (destructuring-bind (eval-when situations &rest body) exp
- (declare (ignore eval-when))
- (multiple-value-bind (ct lt e)
- (sb!c:parse-eval-when-situations situations)
- ;; CLHS 3.8 - Special Operator EVAL-WHEN: The use of
- ;; the situation :EXECUTE (or EVAL) controls whether
- ;; evaluation occurs for other EVAL-WHEN forms; that
- ;; is, those that are not top level forms, or those
- ;; in code processed by EVAL or COMPILE. If the
- ;; :EXECUTE situation is specified in such a form,
- ;; then the body forms are processed as an implicit
- ;; PROGN; otherwise, the EVAL-WHEN form returns NIL.
- (declare (ignore ct lt))
- (when e
- (eval-progn-body body lexenv)))))
- ((locally)
- (eval-locally exp lexenv))
- ((macrolet)
- (destructuring-bind (definitions &rest body)
- (rest exp)
- (let ((lexenv
- (let ((sb!c:*lexenv* lexenv))
- (sb!c::funcall-in-macrolet-lexenv
- definitions
- (lambda (&key funs)
- (declare (ignore funs))
- sb!c:*lexenv*)
- :eval))))
- (eval-locally `(locally ,@body) lexenv))))
- ((symbol-macrolet)
- (destructuring-bind (definitions &rest body) (rest exp)
- (multiple-value-bind (lexenv vars)
- (let ((sb!c:*lexenv* lexenv))
- (sb!c::funcall-in-symbol-macrolet-lexenv
- definitions
- (lambda (&key vars)
- (values sb!c:*lexenv* vars))
- :eval))
- (eval-locally `(locally ,@body) lexenv :vars vars))))
- (t
- (if (and (symbolp name)
- (eq (info :function :kind name) :function))
- (collect ((args))
- (dolist (arg (rest exp))
- (args (eval-in-lexenv arg lexenv)))
- (apply (symbol-function name) (args)))
- (%eval exp lexenv))))))
- (t
- exp)))))
+ (handler-bind ((eval-error
+ (lambda (condition)
+ (error 'interpreted-program-error
+ :condition (encapsulated-condition condition)
+ :form exp))))
+ (typecase exp
+ (symbol
+ (ecase (info :variable :kind exp)
+ ((:special :global :constant :unknown)
+ (symbol-value exp))
+ ;; FIXME: This special case here is a symptom of non-ANSI
+ ;; weirdness in SBCL's ALIEN implementation, which could
+ ;; cause problems for e.g. code walkers. It'd probably be
+ ;; good to ANSIfy it by making alien variable accessors
+ ;; into ordinary forms, e.g. (SB-UNIX:ENV) and (SETF
+ ;; SB-UNIX:ENV), instead of magical symbols, e.g. plain
+ ;; SB-UNIX:ENV. Then if the old magical-symbol syntax is to
+ ;; be retained for compatibility, it can be implemented
+ ;; with DEFINE-SYMBOL-MACRO, keeping the code walkers
+ ;; happy.
+ (:alien
+ (sb!alien-internals:alien-value exp))))
+ (list
+ (let ((name (first exp))
+ (n-args (1- (length exp))))
+ (case name
+ ((function)
+ (unless (= n-args 1)
+ (error "wrong number of args to FUNCTION:~% ~S" exp))
+ (let ((name (second exp)))
+ (if (and (legal-fun-name-p name)
+ (not (consp (let ((sb!c:*lexenv* lexenv))
+ (sb!c:lexenv-find name funs)))))
+ (%coerce-name-to-fun name)
+ ;; FIXME: This is a bit wasteful: it would be nice to call
+ ;; COMPILE-IN-LEXENV with the lambda-form directly, but
+ ;; getting consistent source context and muffling compiler notes
+ ;; is easier this way.
+ (%simple-eval original-exp lexenv))))
+ ((quote)
+ (unless (= n-args 1)
+ (error "wrong number of args to QUOTE:~% ~S" exp))
+ (second exp))
+ (setq
+ (unless (evenp n-args)
+ (error "odd number of args to SETQ:~% ~S" exp))
+ (unless (zerop n-args)
+ (do ((name (cdr exp) (cddr name)))
+ ((null name)
+ (do ((args (cdr exp) (cddr args)))
+ ((null (cddr args))
+ ;; We duplicate the call to SET so that the
+ ;; correct value gets returned.
+ (set (first args)
+ (simple-eval-in-lexenv (second args) lexenv)))
+ (set (first args)
+ (simple-eval-in-lexenv (second args) lexenv))))
+ (let ((symbol (first name)))
+ (case (info :variable :kind symbol)
+ (:special)
+ (t (return (%simple-eval original-exp lexenv))))
+ (unless (type= (info :variable :type symbol)
+ *universal-type*)
+ ;; let the compiler deal with type checking
+ (return (%simple-eval original-exp lexenv)))))))
+ ((progn)
+ (simple-eval-progn-body (rest exp) lexenv))
+ ((eval-when)
+ ;; FIXME: DESTRUCTURING-BIND returns ARG-COUNT-ERROR
+ ;; instead of PROGRAM-ERROR when there's something wrong
+ ;; with the syntax here (e.g. missing SITUATIONS). This
+ ;; could be fixed by hand-crafting clauses to catch and
+ ;; report each possibility, but it would probably be
+ ;; cleaner to write a new macro
+ ;; DESTRUCTURING-BIND-PROGRAM-SYNTAX which does
+ ;; DESTRUCTURING-BIND and promotes any mismatch to
+ ;; PROGRAM-ERROR, then to use it here and in (probably
+ ;; dozens of) other places where the same problem
+ ;; arises.
+ (destructuring-bind (eval-when situations &rest body) exp
+ (declare (ignore eval-when))
+ (multiple-value-bind (ct lt e)
+ (sb!c:parse-eval-when-situations situations)
+ ;; CLHS 3.8 - Special Operator EVAL-WHEN: The use of
+ ;; the situation :EXECUTE (or EVAL) controls whether
+ ;; evaluation occurs for other EVAL-WHEN forms; that
+ ;; is, those that are not top level forms, or those
+ ;; in code processed by EVAL or COMPILE. If the
+ ;; :EXECUTE situation is specified in such a form,
+ ;; then the body forms are processed as an implicit
+ ;; PROGN; otherwise, the EVAL-WHEN form returns NIL.
+ (declare (ignore ct lt))
+ (when e
+ (simple-eval-progn-body body lexenv)))))
+ ((locally)
+ (simple-eval-locally exp lexenv))
+ ((macrolet)
+ (destructuring-bind (definitions &rest body)
+ (rest exp)
+ (let ((lexenv
+ (let ((sb!c:*lexenv* lexenv))
+ (sb!c::funcall-in-macrolet-lexenv
+ definitions
+ (lambda (&key funs)
+ (declare (ignore funs))
+ sb!c:*lexenv*)
+ :eval))))
+ (simple-eval-locally `(locally ,@body) lexenv))))
+ ((symbol-macrolet)
+ (destructuring-bind (definitions &rest body) (rest exp)
+ (multiple-value-bind (lexenv vars)
+ (let ((sb!c:*lexenv* lexenv))
+ (sb!c::funcall-in-symbol-macrolet-lexenv
+ definitions
+ (lambda (&key vars)
+ (values sb!c:*lexenv* vars))
+ :eval))
+ (simple-eval-locally `(locally ,@body) lexenv :vars vars))))
+ ((if)
+ (destructuring-bind (test then &optional else) (rest exp)
+ (eval-in-lexenv (if (eval-in-lexenv test lexenv)
+ then
+ else)
+ lexenv)))
+ ((let let*)
+ (%simple-eval exp lexenv))
+ (t
+ (if (and (symbolp name)
+ (eq (info :function :kind name) :function))
+ (collect ((args))
+ (dolist (arg (rest exp))
+ (args (eval-in-lexenv arg lexenv)))
+ (apply (symbol-function name) (args)))
+ (%simple-eval exp lexenv))))))
+ (t
+ exp))))))
+
+(defun eval-in-lexenv (exp lexenv)
+ #!+sb-eval
+ (if (eq *evaluator-mode* :compile)
+ (simple-eval-in-lexenv exp lexenv)
+ (sb!eval:eval-in-native-environment exp lexenv))
+ #!-sb-eval
+ (simple-eval-in-lexenv exp lexenv))
+
+(defun eval (original-exp)
+ #!+sb-doc
+ "Evaluate the argument in a null lexical environment, returning the
+ result or results."
+ (let ((*eval-source-context* original-exp)
+ (*eval-tlf-index* nil)
+ (*eval-source-info* nil))
+ (eval-in-lexenv original-exp (make-null-lexenv))))
+
+(defun eval-tlf (original-exp tlf-index &optional (lexenv (make-null-lexenv)))
+ (let ((*eval-source-context* original-exp)
+ (*eval-tlf-index* tlf-index)
+ (*eval-source-info* sb!c::*source-info*))
+ (eval-in-lexenv original-exp lexenv)))
\f
;;; miscellaneous full function definitions of things which are
;;; ordinarily handled magically by the compiler
last argument, appended to the value of the last argument, which must be a
list."
(cond ((atom arguments)
- (apply function arg))
- ((atom (cdr arguments))
- (apply function (cons arg (car arguments))))
- (t (do* ((a1 arguments a2)
- (a2 (cdr arguments) (cdr a2)))
- ((atom (cdr a2))
- (rplacd a1 (car a2))
- (apply function (cons arg arguments)))))))
+ (apply function arg))
+ ((atom (cdr arguments))
+ (apply function (cons arg (car arguments))))
+ (t (do* ((a1 arguments a2)
+ (a2 (cdr arguments) (cdr a2)))
+ ((atom (cdr a2))
+ (rplacd a1 (car a2))
+ (apply function (cons arg arguments)))))))
(defun funcall (function &rest arguments)
#!+sb-doc
(defun values (&rest values)
#!+sb-doc
"Return all arguments, in order, as values."
- (declare (dynamic-extent values))
+ (declare (truly-dynamic-extent values))
(values-list values))
(defun values-list (list)
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff