sb!vm:read-only-space-start))
(defun control-stack-usage ()
- #!-x86 (- (sb!sys:sap-int (sb!c::control-stack-pointer-sap))
- sb!vm:control-stack-start)
- #!+x86 (- sb!vm:control-stack-end
- (sb!sys:sap-int (sb!c::control-stack-pointer-sap))))
+ #!-stack-grows-downward-not-upward
+ (- (sb!sys:sap-int (sb!c::control-stack-pointer-sap))
+ sb!vm:control-stack-start)
+ #!+stack-grows-downward-not-upward
+ (- sb!vm:control-stack-end
+ (sb!sys:sap-int (sb!c::control-stack-pointer-sap))))
(defun binding-stack-usage ()
(- (sb!sys:sap-int (sb!c::binding-stack-pointer-sap))
;;; Unlike CMU CL, we don't export this variable. (There's no need to,
;;; since our BYTES-CONSED-BETWEEN-GCS function is SETFable.)
(defvar *bytes-consed-between-gcs*
- #+gencgc (* 4 (expt 10 6))
+ #!+gencgc (* 4 (expt 10 6))
;; Stop-and-copy GC is really really slow when used too often. CSR
;; reported that even on his old 64 Mb SPARC, 20 Mb is much faster
;; than 4 Mb when rebuilding SBCL ca. 0.7.1. For modern machines
;; with >> 128 Mb memory, the optimum could be significantly more
;; than this, but at least 20 Mb should be better than 4 Mb.
- #-gencgc (* 20 (expt 10 6)))
+ #!-gencgc (* 20 (expt 10 6)))
(declaim (type index *bytes-consed-between-gcs*))
;;;; GC hooks