(values
;; FIXME: This old CMU CL code probably deserves a comment
;; explaining to us mere mortals how it works...
- (and (sb!xc:typep type2 'sb!xc:class)
+ (and (sb!xc:typep type2 'classoid)
(dolist (x info nil)
(when (or (not (cdr x))
(csubtypep type1 (specifier-type (cdr x))))
(return
(or (eq type2 (car x))
- (let ((inherits (layout-inherits (class-layout (car x)))))
+ (let ((inherits (layout-inherits
+ (classoid-layout (car x)))))
(dotimes (i (length inherits) nil)
- (when (eq type2 (layout-class (svref inherits i)))
+ (when (eq type2 (layout-classoid (svref inherits i)))
(return t)))))))))
t)))
(destructuring-bind
(super &optional guard)
spec
- (cons (sb!xc:find-class super) guard)))
+ (cons (find-classoid super) guard)))
',specs)))
(setf (type-class-complex-subtypep-arg1 ,type-class)
(lambda (type1 type2)
;;(aver (not (eq type1 *wild-type*))) ; * isn't really a type.
(values (eq type1 type2) t))
+(!define-type-method (named :complex-=) (type1 type2)
+ (cond
+ ((and (eq type2 *empty-type*)
+ (intersection-type-p type1)
+ ;; not allowed to be unsure on these... FIXME: keep the list
+ ;; of CL types that are intersection types once and only
+ ;; once.
+ (not (or (type= type1 (specifier-type 'ratio))
+ (type= type1 (specifier-type 'keyword)))))
+ ;; things like (AND (EQL 0) (SATISFIES ODDP)) or (AND FUNCTION
+ ;; STREAM) can get here. In general, we can't really tell
+ ;; whether these are equal to NIL or not, so
+ (values nil nil))
+ ((type-might-contain-other-types-p type1)
+ (invoke-complex-=-other-method type1 type2))
+ (t (values nil t))))
+
(!define-type-method (named :simple-subtypep) (type1 type2)
(aver (not (eq type1 *wild-type*))) ; * isn't really a type.
(values (or (eq type1 *empty-type*) (eq type2 *wild-type*)) t))
(aver (not (eq type2 *wild-type*))) ; * isn't really a type.
(cond ((eq type2 *universal-type*)
(values t t))
- ((hairy-type-p type1)
+ ((type-might-contain-other-types-p type1)
+ ;; those types can be *EMPTY-TYPE* or *UNIVERSAL-TYPE* in
+ ;; disguise. So we'd better delegate.
(invoke-complex-subtypep-arg1-method type1 type2))
(t
;; FIXME: This seems to rely on there only being 2 or 3
(intersection2 (type-intersection2 type1
complement-type2)))
(if intersection2
- (values (eq intersection2 *empty-type*) t)
+ ;; FIXME: if uncertain, maybe try arg1?
+ (type= intersection2 *empty-type*)
(invoke-complex-subtypep-arg1-method type1 type2))))
(!define-type-method (negation :complex-subtypep-arg1) (type1 type2)
(!define-type-method (negation :complex-=) (type1 type2)
;; (NOT FOO) isn't equivalent to anything that's not a negation
- ;; type, except possibly a hairy type.
+ ;; type, except possibly a type that might contain it in disguise.
(declare (ignore type2))
- (if (hairy-type-p type1)
+ (if (type-might-contain-other-types-p type1)
(values nil nil)
(values nil t)))
(mapcar #'(lambda (x)
(specifier-type `(not ,(type-specifier x))))
(union-type-types not-type))))
+ ((and (cons-type-p not-type)
+ (eq (cons-type-car-type not-type) *universal-type*)
+ (eq (cons-type-cdr-type not-type) *universal-type*))
+ (make-negation-type :type not-type))
+ ((cons-type-p not-type)
+ (type-union
+ (make-negation-type :type (specifier-type 'cons))
+ (cond
+ ((and (not (eq (cons-type-car-type not-type) *universal-type*))
+ (not (eq (cons-type-cdr-type not-type) *universal-type*)))
+ (type-union
+ (make-cons-type
+ (specifier-type `(not ,(type-specifier
+ (cons-type-car-type not-type))))
+ *universal-type*)
+ (make-cons-type
+ *universal-type*
+ (specifier-type `(not ,(type-specifier
+ (cons-type-cdr-type not-type)))))))
+ ((not (eq (cons-type-car-type not-type) *universal-type*))
+ (make-cons-type
+ (specifier-type `(not ,(type-specifier
+ (cons-type-car-type not-type))))
+ *universal-type*))
+ ((not (eq (cons-type-cdr-type not-type) *universal-type*))
+ (make-cons-type
+ *universal-type*
+ (specifier-type `(not ,(type-specifier
+ (cons-type-cdr-type not-type))))))
+ (t (bug "Weird CONS type ~S" not-type)))))
(t (make-negation-type :type not-type)))))
\f
;;;; numeric types
(null complexp2)))
(values nil t))
;; If the classes are specified and different, the types are
- ;; disjoint unless type2 is rational and type1 is integer.
+ ;; disjoint unless type2 is RATIONAL and type1 is INTEGER.
+ ;; [ or type1 is INTEGER and type2 is of the form (RATIONAL
+ ;; X X) for integral X, but this is dealt with in the
+ ;; canonicalization inside MAKE-NUMERIC-TYPE ]
((not (or (eq class1 class2)
(null class2)
- (and (eq class1 'integer)
- (eq class2 'rational))))
+ (and (eq class1 'integer) (eq class2 'rational))))
(values nil t))
;; If the float formats are specified and different, the types
;; are disjoint.
;;; Return a numeric type that is a supertype for both TYPE1 and TYPE2.
;;;
-;;; ### Note: we give up early to keep from dropping lots of information on
-;;; the floor by returning overly general types.
+;;; Old comment, probably no longer applicable:
+;;;
+;;; ### Note: we give up early to keep from dropping lots of
+;;; information on the floor by returning overly general types.
(!define-type-method (number :simple-union2) (type1 type2)
(declare (type numeric-type type1 type2))
(cond ((csubtypep type1 type2) type2)
(class2 (numeric-type-class type2))
(format2 (numeric-type-format type2))
(complexp2 (numeric-type-complexp type2)))
- (when (and (eq class1 class2)
- (eq format1 format2)
- (eq complexp1 complexp2)
- (or (numeric-types-intersect type1 type2)
- (numeric-types-adjacent type1 type2)
- (numeric-types-adjacent type2 type1)))
- (make-numeric-type
- :class class1
- :format format1
- :complexp complexp1
- :low (numeric-bound-max (numeric-type-low type1)
- (numeric-type-low type2)
- <= < t)
- :high (numeric-bound-max (numeric-type-high type1)
- (numeric-type-high type2)
- >= > t)))))))
+ (cond
+ ((and (eq class1 class2)
+ (eq format1 format2)
+ (eq complexp1 complexp2)
+ (or (numeric-types-intersect type1 type2)
+ (numeric-types-adjacent type1 type2)
+ (numeric-types-adjacent type2 type1)))
+ (make-numeric-type
+ :class class1
+ :format format1
+ :complexp complexp1
+ :low (numeric-bound-max (numeric-type-low type1)
+ (numeric-type-low type2)
+ <= < t)
+ :high (numeric-bound-max (numeric-type-high type1)
+ (numeric-type-high type2)
+ >= > t)))
+ ;; FIXME: These two clauses are almost identical, and the
+ ;; consequents are in fact identical in every respect.
+ ((and (eq class1 'rational)
+ (eq class2 'integer)
+ (eq format1 format2)
+ (eq complexp1 complexp2)
+ (integerp (numeric-type-low type2))
+ (integerp (numeric-type-high type2))
+ (= (numeric-type-low type2) (numeric-type-high type2))
+ (or (numeric-types-adjacent type1 type2)
+ (numeric-types-adjacent type2 type1)))
+ (make-numeric-type
+ :class 'rational
+ :format format1
+ :complexp complexp1
+ :low (numeric-bound-max (numeric-type-low type1)
+ (numeric-type-low type2)
+ <= < t)
+ :high (numeric-bound-max (numeric-type-high type1)
+ (numeric-type-high type2)
+ >= > t)))
+ ((and (eq class1 'integer)
+ (eq class2 'rational)
+ (eq format1 format2)
+ (eq complexp1 complexp2)
+ (integerp (numeric-type-low type1))
+ (integerp (numeric-type-high type1))
+ (= (numeric-type-low type1) (numeric-type-high type1))
+ (or (numeric-types-adjacent type1 type2)
+ (numeric-types-adjacent type2 type1)))
+ (make-numeric-type
+ :class 'rational
+ :format format1
+ :complexp complexp1
+ :low (numeric-bound-max (numeric-type-low type1)
+ (numeric-type-low type2)
+ <= < t)
+ :high (numeric-bound-max (numeric-type-high type1)
+ (numeric-type-high type2)
+ >= > t)))
+ (t nil))))))
+
(!cold-init-forms
(setf (info :type :kind 'number)
(h (canonicalized-bound high 'integer))
(hb (if (consp h) (1- (car h)) h)))
(if (and hb lb (< hb lb))
- ;; previously we threw an error here:
- ;; (error "Lower bound ~S is greater than upper bound ~S." l h))
- ;; but ANSI doesn't say anything about that, so:
*empty-type*
(make-numeric-type :class 'integer
:complexp :real
(let ((lb (canonicalized-bound low ',type))
(hb (canonicalized-bound high ',type)))
(if (not (numeric-bound-test* lb hb <= <))
- ;; as above, previously we did
- ;; (error "Lower bound ~S is not less than upper bound ~S." low high))
- ;; but it is correct to do
*empty-type*
(make-numeric-type :class ',class
:format ',format
(intersection-type-types type2)))
(defun %intersection-complex-subtypep-arg1 (type1 type2)
- (any/type (swapped-args-fun #'csubtypep)
- type2
- (intersection-type-types type1)))
+ (type= type1 (type-intersection type1 type2)))
(defun %intersection-simple-subtypep (type1 type2)
(every/type #'%intersection-complex-subtypep-arg1
((and (not (intersection-type-p type1))
(%intersection-complex-subtypep-arg1 type2 type1))
type1)
+ ;; KLUDGE: This special (and somewhat hairy) magic is required
+ ;; to deal with the RATIONAL/INTEGER special case. The UNION
+ ;; of (INTEGER * -1) and (AND (RATIONAL * -1/2) (NOT INTEGER))
+ ;; should be (RATIONAL * -1/2) -- CSR, 2003-02-28
+ ((and (csubtypep type2 (specifier-type 'ratio))
+ (numeric-type-p type1)
+ (csubtypep type1 (specifier-type 'integer))
+ (csubtypep type2
+ (make-numeric-type
+ :class 'rational
+ :complexp nil
+ :low (if (null (numeric-type-low type1))
+ nil
+ (list (1- (numeric-type-low type1))))
+ :high (if (null (numeric-type-high type1))
+ nil
+ (list (1+ (numeric-type-high type1)))))))
+ (type-union type1
+ (apply #'type-intersection
+ (remove (specifier-type '(not integer))
+ (intersection-type-types type2)
+ :test #'type=))))
(t
(let ((accumulator *universal-type*))
(do ((t2s (intersection-type-types type2) (cdr t2s)))
(!define-type-method (union :complex-=) (type1 type2)
(declare (ignore type1))
- (if (some #'hairy-type-p (union-type-types type2))
+ (if (some #'type-might-contain-other-types-p
+ (union-type-types type2))
(values nil nil)
(values nil t)))
(!def-type-translator cons (&optional (car-type-spec '*) (cdr-type-spec '*))
(let ((car-type (specifier-type car-type-spec))
(cdr-type (specifier-type cdr-type-spec)))
- (if (or (eq car-type *empty-type*)
- (eq cdr-type *empty-type*))
- *empty-type*
- (make-cons-type car-type cdr-type))))
+ (make-cons-type car-type cdr-type)))
(!define-type-method (cons :unparse) (type)
(let ((car-eltype (type-specifier (cons-type-car-type type)))
(car-type2 (cons-type-car-type type2))
(cdr-type1 (cons-type-cdr-type type1))
(cdr-type2 (cons-type-cdr-type type2)))
- (cond ((type= car-type1 car-type2)
- (make-cons-type car-type1
- (type-union cdr-type1 cdr-type2)))
- ((type= cdr-type1 cdr-type2)
- (make-cons-type (type-union cdr-type1 cdr-type2)
- cdr-type1)))))
-
+ ;; UGH. -- CSR, 2003-02-24
+ (macrolet ((frob-car (car1 car2 cdr1 cdr2)
+ `(type-union
+ (make-cons-type ,car1 (type-union ,cdr1 ,cdr2))
+ (make-cons-type
+ (type-intersection ,car2
+ (specifier-type
+ `(not ,(type-specifier ,car1))))
+ ,cdr2))))
+ (cond ((type= car-type1 car-type2)
+ (make-cons-type car-type1
+ (type-union cdr-type1 cdr-type2)))
+ ((type= cdr-type1 cdr-type2)
+ (make-cons-type (type-union car-type1 car-type2)
+ cdr-type1))
+ ((csubtypep car-type1 car-type2)
+ (frob-car car-type1 car-type2 cdr-type1 cdr-type2))
+ ((csubtypep car-type2 car-type1)
+ (frob-car car-type2 car-type1 cdr-type2 cdr-type1))
+ ;; Don't put these in -- consider the effect of taking the
+ ;; union of (CONS (INTEGER 0 2) (INTEGER 5 7)) and
+ ;; (CONS (INTEGER 0 3) (INTEGER 5 6)).
+ #+nil
+ ((csubtypep cdr-type1 cdr-type2)
+ (frob-cdr car-type1 car-type2 cdr-type1 cdr-type2))
+ #+nil
+ ((csubtypep cdr-type2 cdr-type1)
+ (frob-cdr car-type2 car-type1 cdr-type2 cdr-type1))))))
+
(!define-type-method (cons :simple-intersection2) (type1 type2)
(declare (type cons-type type1 type2))
(let (car-int2
(defun defined-ftype-matches-declared-ftype-p (defined-ftype declared-ftype)
(declare (type ctype defined-ftype declared-ftype))
(flet ((is-built-in-class-function-p (ctype)
- (and (built-in-class-p ctype)
- (eq (built-in-class-%name ctype) 'function))))
+ (and (built-in-classoid-p ctype)
+ (eq (built-in-classoid-name ctype) 'function))))
(cond (;; DECLARED-FTYPE could certainly be #<BUILT-IN-CLASS FUNCTION>;
;; that's what happens when we (DECLAIM (FTYPE FUNCTION FOO)).
(is-built-in-class-function-p declared-ftype)
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff