0.pre7.20:

[sbcl.git] / src / code / macros.lisp

diff --git a/src/code/macros.lisp b/src/code/macros.lisp
index d94900c..559889e 100644 (file)
--- a/src/code/macros.lisp
+++ b/src/code/macros.lisp
@@ -80,11 +80,10 @@
 
 (defmacro-mundanely defconstant (name value &optional documentation)
   #!+sb-doc
-  "For defining global constants. DEFCONSTANT says that the value is
-  constant and may be compiled into code. If the variable already has
-  a value, and this is not EQL to the init, the code is not portable
-  (undefined behavior). The third argument is an optional documentation
-  string for the variable."
+  "Define a global constant, saying that the value is constant and may be
+  compiled into code. If the variable already has a value, and this is not
+  EQL to the new value, the code is not portable (undefined behavior). The
+  third argument is an optional documentation string for the variable."
   `(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
      (sb!c::%defconstant ',name ,value ',documentation)))
 
@@ -204,12 +203,6 @@ the usual naming convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables"
                      ,body))))
        `(sb!c::%define-compiler-macro ',name #',def ',lambda-list ,doc)))))
 (defun sb!c::%define-compiler-macro (name definition lambda-list doc)
-  ;; FIXME: Why does this have to be an interpreted function? Shouldn't
-  ;; it get compiled?
-  (aver (sb!eval:interpreted-function-p definition))
-  (setf (sb!eval:interpreted-function-name definition)
-       (format nil "DEFINE-COMPILER-MACRO ~S" name))
-  (setf (sb!eval:interpreted-function-arglist definition) lambda-list)
   (sb!c::%%define-compiler-macro name definition doc))
 (defun sb!c::%%define-compiler-macro (name definition doc)
   (setf (sb!xc:compiler-macro-function name) definition)