0.6.11.24:

[sbcl.git] / src / code / macros.lisp

diff --git a/src/code/macros.lisp b/src/code/macros.lisp
index 46865dd..d4731bb 100644 (file)
--- a/src/code/macros.lisp
+++ b/src/code/macros.lisp
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
   #!+sb-doc
   "Signals an error if the value of test-form is nil. Continuing from this
    error using the CONTINUE restart will allow the user to alter the value of
-   some locations known to SETF, starting over with test-form. Returns nil."
+   some locations known to SETF, starting over with test-form. Returns NIL."
   `(do () (,test-form)
      (assert-error ',test-form ',places ,datum ,@arguments)
      ,@(mapcar #'(lambda (place)
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
 (defun sb!c::%define-compiler-macro (name definition lambda-list doc)
   ;; FIXME: Why does this have to be an interpreted function? Shouldn't
   ;; it get compiled?
-  (assert (sb!eval:interpreted-function-p definition))
+  (aver (sb!eval:interpreted-function-p definition))
   (setf (sb!eval:interpreted-function-name definition)
        (format nil "DEFINE-COMPILER-MACRO ~S" name))
   (setf (sb!eval:interpreted-function-arglist definition) lambda-list)