(in-package "SB!IMPL")
-(defmacro atomic-incf/symbol (symbol-name &optional (delta 1))
- #!-sb-thread
- `(incf ,symbol-name ,delta)
- #!+sb-thread
- `(locally
- (declare (optimize (safety 0) (speed 3)))
- (sb!vm::locked-symbol-global-value-add ',symbol-name ,delta)))
+;;;; these are initialized in cold init
-(defvar *gc-inhibit*) ; initialized in cold init
+(defvar *in-without-gcing*)
+(defvar *gc-inhibit*)
;;; When the dynamic usage increases beyond this amount, the system
;;; notes that a garbage collection needs to occur by setting
;;; *GC-PENDING* to T. It starts out as NIL meaning nobody has figured
;;; out what it should be yet.
-(defvar *gc-pending* nil)
+(defvar *gc-pending*)
#!+sb-thread
-(defvar *stop-for-gc-pending* nil)
+(defvar *stop-for-gc-pending*)
+
+;;; This one is initialized by the runtime, at thread creation. On
+;;; non-x86oid gencgc targets, this is a per-thread list of objects
+;;; which must not be moved during GC. It is frobbed by the code for
+;;; with-pinned-objects in src/compiler/target/macros.lisp.
+#!+(and gencgc (not (or x86 x86-64)))
+(defvar sb!vm::*pinned-objects*)
(defmacro without-gcing (&body body)
#!+sb-doc
locks, application code can never be certain that this invariant is
maintained."
(with-unique-names (without-gcing-body)
- `(flet ((,without-gcing-body ()
+ `(dx-flet ((,without-gcing-body ()
,@body))
(if *gc-inhibit*
(,without-gcing-body)
- (without-interrupts
- ;; We need to disable interrupts before disabling GC, so that
- ;; signal handlers using locks don't accidentally try to grab
- ;; them with GC inhibited.
- ;;
- ;; It would be nice to implement this with just a single UWP, but
- ;; unfortunately it seems that it cannot be done: the naive
- ;; solution of binding both *INTERRUPTS-ENABLED* and
- ;; *GC-INHIBIT*, and checking for both pending GC and interrupts
- ;; in the cleanup breaks if we have a GC pending, but no
- ;; interrupts, and we receive an asynch unwind while checking for
- ;; the pending GC: we unwind before handling the pending GC, and
- ;; will be left running with further GCs blocked due to the GC
- ;; pending flag.
+ ;; We need to disable interrupts before disabling GC, so
+ ;; that signal handlers using locks don't accidentally try
+ ;; to grab them with GC inhibited.
+ (let ((*in-without-gcing* t))
(unwind-protect
- (let ((*gc-inhibit* t))
+ (let* ((*allow-with-interrupts* nil)
+ (*interrupts-enabled* nil)
+ (*gc-inhibit* t))
(,without-gcing-body))
- (when (or *gc-pending* #!+sb-thread *stop-for-gc-pending*)
+ ;; This is not racy becuase maybe_defer_handler
+ ;; defers signals if *GC-INHIBIT* is NIL but there
+ ;; is a pending gc or stop-for-gc.
+ (when (or *interrupt-pending*
+ *gc-pending*
+ #!+sb-thread *stop-for-gc-pending*)
(sb!unix::receive-pending-interrupt))))))))
\f
;;; EOF-OR-LOSE is a useful macro that handles EOF.
;;; within the scope of a PREPARE-FOR-FAST-READ-CHAR.
(defmacro fast-read-char (&optional (eof-error-p t) (eof-value ()))
`(cond
- ((not %frc-buffer%)
- (funcall %frc-method% %frc-stream% ,eof-error-p ,eof-value))
- ((= %frc-index% +ansi-stream-in-buffer-length+)
- (prog1 (fast-read-char-refill %frc-stream% ,eof-error-p ,eof-value)
- (setq %frc-index% (ansi-stream-in-index %frc-stream%))))
- (t
- (prog1 (aref %frc-buffer% %frc-index%)
- (incf %frc-index%)))))
+ ((not %frc-buffer%)
+ (funcall %frc-method% %frc-stream% ,eof-error-p ,eof-value))
+ ((= %frc-index% +ansi-stream-in-buffer-length+)
+ (multiple-value-bind (eof-p index-or-value)
+ (fast-read-char-refill %frc-stream% ,eof-error-p ,eof-value)
+ (if eof-p
+ index-or-value
+ (progn
+ (setq %frc-index% (1+ index-or-value))
+ (aref %frc-buffer% index-or-value)))))
+ (t
+ (prog1 (aref %frc-buffer% %frc-index%)
+ (incf %frc-index%)))))
;;;; And these for the fasloader...