0.8.7.2:
[sbcl.git] / src / code / thread.lisp
index c5c7104..e1e0417 100644 (file)
@@ -1,31 +1,28 @@
-(in-package :sb!thread)
+(in-package "SB!THREAD")
 
-#+sb-xc-host
-(defun make-mutex (&key name value) nil)
-
-#+sb-xc-host
-(defmacro with-recursive-lock ((mutex) &body body)
-  `(progn ,@body))
-
-#-sb-xc-host
-(defmacro with-recursive-lock ((mutex) &body body)
-  (let ((cfp (gensym "CFP")))
-    `(let ((,cfp (ash (sb!sys:sap-int (sb!vm::current-fp) ) -2)))
+(sb!xc:defmacro with-recursive-lock ((mutex) &body body)
+  #!+sb-thread
+  (with-unique-names (cfp)
+    `(let ((,cfp (sb!kernel:current-fp)))
       (unless (and (mutex-value ,mutex)
-                  (SB!DI::control-stack-pointer-valid-p
-                   (sb!sys:int-sap (ash (mutex-value ,mutex) 2))))
-       (get-mutex ,mutex ,cfp))
+                  (sb!vm:control-stack-pointer-valid-p
+                   (sb!sys:int-sap
+                    (sb!kernel:get-lisp-obj-address (mutex-value ,mutex)))))
+       ;; this punning with MAKE-LISP-OBJ depends for its safety on
+       ;; the frame pointer being a lispobj-aligned integer.  While
+       ;; it is, then MAKE-LISP-OBJ will always return a FIXNUM, so
+       ;; we're safe to do that.  Should this ever change, this
+       ;; MAKE-LISP-OBJ could return something that looks like a
+       ;; pointer, but pointing into neverneverland, which will
+       ;; confuse GC completely.  -- CSR, 2003-06-03
+       (get-mutex ,mutex (sb!kernel:make-lisp-obj (sb!sys:sap-int ,cfp))))
       (unwind-protect
           (progn ,@body)
-       (when (eql (mutex-value ,mutex) ,cfp) (release-mutex ,mutex))))))
-
-(defun get-foreground ()
-  (when (not (eql (mutex-value *session-lock*)  (CURRENT-THREAD-ID)))
-    (get-mutex *session-lock*))
-  (sb!sys:enable-interrupt :sigint #'sb!unix::sigint-handler)
-  t)
+       (when (sb!sys:sap= (sb!sys:int-sap
+                           (sb!kernel:get-lisp-obj-address
+                            (mutex-value ,mutex)))
+                          ,cfp)
+         (release-mutex ,mutex)))))
+  #!-sb-thread
+  `(progn ,@body))
 
-(defun release-foreground ()
-  (sb!sys:enable-interrupt :sigint :ignore)
-  (release-mutex *session-lock*)
-  t)