(defvar / nil
#!+sb-doc
- "a list of all the values returned by the most recent top-level EVAL")
+ "a list of all the values returned by the most recent top level EVAL")
(defvar // nil #!+sb-doc "the previous value of /")
(defvar /// nil #!+sb-doc "the previous value of //")
-(defvar * nil #!+sb-doc "the value of the most recent top-level EVAL")
+(defvar * nil #!+sb-doc "the value of the most recent top level EVAL")
(defvar ** nil #!+sb-doc "the previous value of *")
(defvar *** nil #!+sb-doc "the previous value of **")
-(defvar + nil #!+sb-doc "the value of the most recent top-level READ")
+(defvar + nil #!+sb-doc "the value of the most recent top level READ")
(defvar ++ nil #!+sb-doc "the previous value of +")
(defvar +++ nil #!+sb-doc "the previous value of ++")
(defvar - nil #!+sb-doc "the form currently being evaluated")
-(defvar *prompt* "* "
- #!+sb-doc
- "The top-level prompt string. This also may be a function of no arguments
- that returns a simple-string.")
+
+;;; the top level prompt string, or a function of no arguments that
+;;; returns a simple-string
+(defvar *prompt* "* ")
(defun interactive-eval (form)
"Evaluate FORM, returning whatever it returns and adjusting ***, **, *,
(finish-output (symbol-value name)))
(values))
-;;; the default system top-level function
+;;; the default system top level function
(defun toplevel-init ()
(/show0 "entering TOPLEVEL-INIT")
;; get you out to here.
(with-simple-restart (abort
"Reduce debugger level (leaving debugger).")
- (catch 'top-level-catcher
- (sb!unix:unix-sigsetmask 0) ; FIXME: What is this for?
- (/show0 "about to enter inner LOOP in TOPLEVEL-REPL")
- (loop ; FIXME: Do we need this inner LOOP?
- ;; FIXME: It seems bad to have GC behavior depend on scrubbing
- ;; the control stack before each interactive command. Isn't
- ;; there some way we can convince the GC to just ignore
- ;; dead areas of the control stack, so that we don't need to
- ;; rely on this half-measure?
- (scrub-control-stack)
- (unless noprint
- (fresh-line)
- (princ (if (functionp *prompt*)
- (funcall *prompt*)
- *prompt*))
- (flush-standard-output-streams))
- (let ((form (read *standard-input* nil eof-marker)))
- (if (eq form eof-marker)
- (quit)
- (let ((results
- (multiple-value-list (interactive-eval form))))
- (unless noprint
- (dolist (result results)
- (fresh-line)
- (prin1 result)))))))))))))
+ (catch 'toplevel-catcher
+ (sb!unix:unix-sigsetmask 0) ; FIXME: What is this for?
+ (/show0 "about to enter inner LOOP in TOPLEVEL-REPL")
+ (loop ; FIXME: Do we need this inner LOOP?
+ ;; FIXME: It seems bad to have GC behavior depend on scrubbing
+ ;; the control stack before each interactive command. Isn't
+ ;; there some way we can convince the GC to just ignore
+ ;; dead areas of the control stack, so that we don't need to
+ ;; rely on this half-measure?
+ (scrub-control-stack)
+ (unless noprint
+ (fresh-line)
+ (princ (if (functionp *prompt*)
+ (funcall *prompt*)
+ *prompt*))
+ (flush-standard-output-streams))
+ (let ((form (read *standard-input* nil eof-marker)))
+ (if (eq form eof-marker)
+ (quit)
+ (let ((results
+ (multiple-value-list (interactive-eval form))))
+ (unless noprint
+ (dolist (result results)
+ (fresh-line)
+ (prin1 result)))))))))))))
(defun noprogrammer-debugger-hook-fun (condition old-debugger-hook)
(declare (ignore old-debugger-hook))