0.pre7.74:

[sbcl.git] / src / cold / compile-cold-sbcl.lisp

diff --git a/src/cold/compile-cold-sbcl.lisp b/src/cold/compile-cold-sbcl.lisp
index b0d2a5d..987e65a 100644 (file)
--- a/src/cold/compile-cold-sbcl.lisp
+++ b/src/cold/compile-cold-sbcl.lisp
@@ -18,20 +18,21 @@
 
 ;;; KLUDGE..
 ;;;
-;;; CMU CL (as of 2.4.6 for Debian, anyway) issues warnings (and not just
-;;; STYLE-WARNINGs, either, alas) when it tries to interpret code containing
-;;; references to undefined functions. The most common problem is that
-;;; macroexpanded code refers to this function, which isn't defined until late.
+;;; CMU CL (as of 2.4.6 for Debian, anyway) issues warnings (and not
+;;; just STYLE-WARNINGs, either, alas) when it tries to interpret code
+;;; containing references to undefined functions. The most common
+;;; problem is that macroexpanded code refers to this function, which
+;;; isn't defined until late.
 ;;;
 ;;; This
-;;;   #+cmu (defun sb!kernel::do-arg-count-error (&rest rest)
-;;;       (error "stub version of do-arg-count-error, rest=~S" rest))
+;;;   #+cmu (defun sb!kernel::arg-count-error (&rest rest)
+;;;          (error "stub version of ARG-COUNT-ERROR, rest=~S" rest))
 ;;; doesn't work, with or without this
-;;;   (compile 'sb!kernel::do-arg-count-error))
+;;;   (compile 'sb!kernel::arg-count-error))
 ;;; so perhaps I should try
 ;;;   (declaim (ftype ..) ..)
 ;;; instead?
-(declaim (ftype (function (&rest t) nil) sb!kernel::do-arg-count-error))
+(declaim (ftype (function (&rest t) nil) sb!kernel::arg-count-error))
 
 (let ((reversed-target-object-file-names nil))
   (do-stems-and-flags (stem flags)