0.9.1.52:

[sbcl.git] / src / compiler / alpha / parms.lisp

diff --git a/src/compiler/alpha/parms.lisp b/src/compiler/alpha/parms.lisp
index 267f272..e7299a2 100644 (file)
--- a/src/compiler/alpha/parms.lisp
+++ b/src/compiler/alpha/parms.lisp
@@ -11,21 +11,16 @@
 
 (eval-when  (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
 
-(def!constant n-word-bits 32
-  #!+sb-doc
-  "Number of bits per word where a word holds one lisp descriptor.")
+;;; number of bits per word where a word holds one lisp descriptor
+(def!constant n-word-bits 32)
 
-(def!constant n-byte-bits 8
-  #!+sb-doc
-  "Number of bits per byte where a byte is the smallest addressable object.")
+;;; the natural width of a machine word (as seen in e.g. register width,
+;;; address space)
+(def!constant n-machine-word-bits 64)
 
-(def!constant word-shift (1- (integer-length (/ n-word-bits n-byte-bits)))
-  #!+sb-doc
-  "Number of bits to shift between word addresses and byte addresses.")
-
-(def!constant n-word-bytes (/ n-word-bits n-byte-bits)
-  #!+sb-doc
-  "Number of bytes in a word.")
+;;; number of bits per byte where a byte is the smallest addressable
+;;; object
+(def!constant n-byte-bits 8)
 
 (def!constant float-sign-shift 31)
 
@@ -127,25 +122,12 @@
 (def!constant static-space-start    #x28000000)
 (def!constant static-space-end      #x2c000000)
 
-;; this is used in PURIFY as part of a sloppy check to see if a pointer
-;; is in dynamic space.  Chocolate brownie for the first person to fix it
-;; -dan 20010502
-(def!constant dynamic-space-start   #x30000000)
-(def!constant dynamic-space-end     #x3fff0000)
-
 (def!constant dynamic-0-space-start   #x30000000)
 (def!constant dynamic-0-space-end     #x3fff0000)
 
 (def!constant dynamic-1-space-start   #x40000000)
 (def!constant dynamic-1-space-end     #x4fff0000)
 
-(def!constant control-stack-start   #x50000000)
-(def!constant control-stack-end     #x51000000)
-
-(def!constant binding-stack-start    #x70000000)
-(def!constant binding-stack-end      #x71000000)
-
-
 ;;; FIXME nothing refers to either of these in alpha or x86 cmucl
 ;;; backend, so they could probably be removed.
 
@@ -191,17 +173,17 @@
 
     ;; The C startup code must fill these in.
     *posix-argv*
-    ;;lisp::lisp-environment-list
-    ;;lisp::lisp-command-line-list
-    sb!impl::*!initial-fdefn-objects*
 
-    ;; Functions that the C code needs to call
-    maybe-gc
+    ;; functions that the C code needs to call
+    sub-gc
     sb!kernel::internal-error
+    sb!kernel::control-stack-exhausted-error
+    sb!kernel::undefined-alien-variable-error
+    sb!kernel::undefined-alien-function-error
     sb!di::handle-breakpoint
     sb!di::handle-fun-end-breakpoint
 
-    ;; free Pointers
+    ;; free pointers
     *read-only-space-free-pointer*
     *static-space-free-pointer*
     *initial-dynamic-space-free-pointer*
@@ -210,6 +192,10 @@
     *current-catch-block*
     *current-unwind-protect-block*
 
+    *binding-stack-start*
+    *control-stack-start*
+    *control-stack-end*
+
     ;; interrupt handling
     *free-interrupt-context-index*
     sb!unix::*interrupts-enabled*
@@ -230,10 +216,12 @@
     ;; a comment from old CMU CL or old old CMU CL or
     ;; the SBCL alpha port or what? Do we need to worry about it,
     ;; or can we delete it?
+    sb!kernel:two-arg-/=
     eql
     sb!kernel:%negate
     sb!kernel:two-arg-and
     sb!kernel:two-arg-ior
     sb!kernel:two-arg-xor
+    sb!kernel:two-arg-eqv
     sb!kernel:two-arg-gcd
     sb!kernel:two-arg-lcm))