|#
-;;; Check a block for consistency at the general flow-graph level, and call
-;;; Check-Node-Consistency on each node to locally check for semantic
-;;; consistency.
+;;; Check a block for consistency at the general flow-graph level, and
+;;; call CHECK-NODE-CONSISTENCY on each node to locally check for
+;;; semantic consistency.
(declaim (ftype (function (cblock) (values)) check-block-consistency))
(defun check-block-consistency (block)
(combination-p node)))
(barf "flushed arg not in local call: ~S" node))
(t
- (let ((fun (ref-leaf (continuation-use
- (basic-combination-fun node))))
- (pos (position arg (basic-combination-args node))))
- (check-type pos fixnum) ; to suppress warning -- WHN 19990311
- (when (leaf-refs (elt (lambda-vars fun) pos))
- (barf "flushed arg for referenced var in ~S" node))))))
-
+ (locally
+ ;; KLUDGE: In sbcl-0.6.11.37, the compiler doesn't like
+ ;; (DECLARE (TYPE INDEX POS)) after the inline expansion of
+ ;; POSITION. It compiles it correctly, but it issues a type
+ ;; mismatch warning because it can't eliminate the
+ ;; possibility that control will flow through the
+ ;; NIL-returning branch. So we punt here. -- WHN 2001-04-15
+ (declare (notinline position))
+ (let ((fun (ref-leaf (continuation-use
+ (basic-combination-fun node))))
+ (pos (position arg (basic-combination-args node))))
+ (declare (type index pos))
+ (when (leaf-refs (elt (lambda-vars fun) pos))
+ (barf "flushed arg for referenced var in ~S" node)))))))
(let ((dest (continuation-dest (node-cont node))))
(when (and (return-p dest)
(eq (basic-combination-kind node) :local)