(in-package "SB!C")
+;;; ANSI limits on compilation
+(defconstant sb!xc:call-arguments-limit most-positive-fixnum
+ #!+sb-doc
+ "The exclusive upper bound on the number of arguments which may be passed
+ to a function, including &REST args.")
+(defconstant sb!xc:lambda-parameters-limit most-positive-fixnum
+ #!+sb-doc
+ "The exclusive upper bound on the number of parameters which may be specifed
+ in a given lambda list. This is actually the limit on required and &OPTIONAL
+ parameters. With &KEY and &AUX you can get more.")
+(defconstant sb!xc:multiple-values-limit most-positive-fixnum
+ #!+sb-doc
+ "The exclusive upper bound on the number of multiple VALUES that you can
+ return.")
+
;;; FIXME: Shouldn't SB!C::&MORE be in this list?
(defconstant-eqx sb!xc:lambda-list-keywords
'(&optional &rest &key &aux &body &whole &allow-other-keys &environment)
(defvar *compiler-note-count*)
(defvar *compiler-trace-output*)
(defvar *constraint-number*)
-(defvar *converting-for-interpreter*)
(defvar *count-vop-usages*)
(defvar *current-path*)
(defvar *current-component*)
;;; to be called when a variable is lexically bound
(declaim (ftype (function (symbol) (values)) note-lexical-binding))
(defun note-lexical-binding (symbol)
- (let ((name (symbol-name symbol)))
;; This check is intended to protect us from getting silently
;; burned when we define
;; foo.lisp:
;; (LET ((*FOO* X))
;; (FOO 14)))
;; and then we happen to compile bar.lisp before foo.lisp.
- (when (and (char= #\* (aref name 0))
- (char= #\* (aref name (1- (length name)))))
+ (when (looks-like-name-of-special-var-p symbol)
;; FIXME: should be COMPILER-STYLE-WARNING?
(style-warn "using the lexical binding of the symbol ~S, not the~@
dynamic binding, even though the symbol name follows the usual naming~@
-convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" symbol)))
+convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" symbol))
(values))