;;; This is not FLUSHABLE, since it's required to signal an error if
;;; unbound.
-(defknown (symbol-value symbol-function) (symbol) t ())
+(defknown (symbol-value) (symbol) t ())
+;;; From CLHS, "If the symbol is globally defined as a macro or a
+;;; special operator, an object of implementation-dependent nature and
+;;; identity is returned. If the symbol is not globally defined as
+;;; either a macro or a special operator, and if the symbol is fbound,
+;;; a function object is returned". Our objects of
+;;; implementation-dependent nature happen to be functions.
+(defknown (symbol-function) (symbol) function ())
(defknown boundp (symbol) boolean (flushable))
(defknown fboundp ((or symbol cons)) boolean (unsafely-flushable explicit-check))
(defknown apply (callable t &rest t) *) ; ### Last arg must be List...
(defknown funcall (callable &rest t) *)
-(defknown (mapcar maplist mapcan mapcon) (callable list &rest list) list
+(defknown (mapcar maplist) (callable list &rest list) list
+ (call))
+
+;;; According to CLHS the result must be a LIST, but we do not check
+;;; it.
+(defknown (mapcan mapcon) (callable list &rest list) t
(call))
(defknown (mapc mapl) (callable list &rest list) list (foldable call))
t
(foldable flushable))
+;; Correct argument type restrictions for these functions are
+;; complicated, so we just declare them to accept LISTs and suppress
+;; flushing is safe code.
(defknown (caar cadr cdar cddr
caaar caadr cadar caddr cdaar cdadr cddar cdddr
caaaar caaadr caadar caaddr cadaar cadadr caddar cadddr
(defknown (read read-preserving-whitespace read-char-no-hang read-char)
(&optional streamlike t t t) t (explicit-check))
-(defknown read-delimited-list (character &optional streamlike t) t
+(defknown read-delimited-list (character &optional streamlike t) list
(explicit-check))
(defknown read-line (&optional streamlike t t t) (values t boolean)
(explicit-check))
function
(flushable foldable))
+(defknown %check-vector-sequence-bounds (vector index sequence-end)
+ index
+ (unwind))
+;;; FIXME: including this information here is probably necessary to
+;;; get efficient compilation of the inline expansion of
+;;; %FIND-POSITION-IF, so it should maybe be in a more
+;;; compiler-friendly package (SB-INT?)
+(defknown sb!impl::signal-bounding-indices-bad-error (sequence index index)
+ nil) ; never returns
+
(defknown arg-count-error (t t t t t t) nil (unsafe))
\f