(in-package "SB!C")
-;;; FIXME: It would be good to implement SB!XC:DEFCONSTANT, and use
-;;; use that here, so that the compiler is born knowing this value.
-;;; FIXME: Add a comment telling whether this holds for all vectors
-;;; or only for vectors based on simple arrays (non-adjustable, etc.).
-(defconstant vector-data-bit-offset
- (* sb!vm:vector-data-offset sb!vm:word-bits))
-
;;; We need to define these predicates, since the TYPEP source
;;; transform picks whichever predicate was defined last when there
;;; are multiple predicates for equivalent types.
-(def-source-transform short-float-p (x) `(single-float-p ,x))
+(define-source-transform short-float-p (x) `(single-float-p ,x))
#!-long-float
-(def-source-transform long-float-p (x) `(double-float-p ,x))
+(define-source-transform long-float-p (x) `(double-float-p ,x))
-(def-source-transform compiled-function-p (x)
+(define-source-transform compiled-function-p (x)
`(functionp ,x))
-(def-source-transform char-int (x)
+(define-source-transform char-int (x)
`(char-code ,x))
(deftransform abs ((x) (rational))
'(if (< x 0) (- x) x))
;;; The layout is stored in slot 0.
-(def-source-transform %instance-layout (x)
+(define-source-transform %instance-layout (x)
`(truly-the layout (%instance-ref ,x 0)))
-(def-source-transform %set-instance-layout (x val)
+(define-source-transform %set-instance-layout (x val)
`(%instance-set ,x 0 (the layout ,val)))
\f
;;;; character support
;;; In our implementation there are really only BASE-CHARs.
-(def-source-transform characterp (obj)
+(define-source-transform characterp (obj)
`(base-char-p ,obj))
\f
;;;; simplifying HAIRY-DATA-VECTOR-REF and HAIRY-DATA-VECTOR-SET
(let ((dims (array-type-dimensions array-type)))
(when (or (atom dims) (= (length dims) 1))
(give-up-ir1-transform))
- (let ((el-type (array-type-element-type array-type))
+ (let ((el-type (array-type-specialized-element-type array-type))
(total-size (if (member '* dims)
'*
(reduce #'* dims))))
(let ((dims (array-type-dimensions array-type)))
(when (or (atom dims) (= (length dims) 1))
(give-up-ir1-transform))
- (let ((el-type (array-type-element-type array-type))
+ (let ((el-type (array-type-specialized-element-type array-type))
(total-size (if (member '* dims)
'*
(reduce #'* dims))))
#+nil
(macrolet
((frob (type bits)
- (let ((elements-per-word (truncate sb!vm:word-bits bits)))
+ (let ((elements-per-word (truncate sb!vm:n-word-bits bits)))
`(progn
(deftransform data-vector-ref ((vector index)
(,type *))
(floor index ,',elements-per-word)
(ldb ,(ecase sb!vm:target-byte-order
(:little-endian '(byte ,bits (* bit ,bits)))
- (:big-endian '(byte ,bits (- sb!vm:word-bits
+ (:big-endian '(byte ,bits (- sb!vm:n-word-bits
(* (1+ bit) ,bits)))))
(%raw-bits vector (+ word sb!vm:vector-data-offset)))))
(deftransform data-vector-set ((vector index new-value)
(setf (ldb ,(ecase sb!vm:target-byte-order
(:little-endian '(byte ,bits (* bit ,bits)))
(:big-endian
- '(byte ,bits (- sb!vm:word-bits
+ '(byte ,bits (- sb!vm:n-word-bits
(* (1+ bit) ,bits)))))
(%raw-bits vector (+ word sb!vm:vector-data-offset)))
new-value)))))))
(frob (simple-array (unsigned-byte 2) (*)) 2)
(frob (simple-array (unsigned-byte 4) (*)) 4))
\f
-;;;; bit vector hackery
+;;;; BIT-VECTOR hackery
-;;; SIMPLE-BIT-VECTOR bit-array operations are transformed to a word loop that
-;;; does 32 bits at a time.
+;;; SIMPLE-BIT-VECTOR bit-array operations are transformed to a word
+;;; loop that does 32 bits at a time.
;;;
-;;; FIXME: This is a lot of repeatedly macroexpanded code. It should be a
-;;; function call instead. And do it with DEF-FROB instead of DOLIST.
-(dolist (x '((bit-and 32bit-logical-and)
- (bit-ior 32bit-logical-or)
- (bit-xor 32bit-logical-xor)
- (bit-eqv 32bit-logical-eqv)
- (bit-nand 32bit-logical-nand)
- (bit-nor 32bit-logical-nor)
- (bit-andc1 32bit-logical-andc1)
- (bit-andc2 32bit-logical-andc2)
- (bit-orc1 32bit-logical-orc1)
- (bit-orc2 32bit-logical-orc2)))
- (destructuring-bind (bitfun wordfun) x
- (deftransform bitfun
- ((bit-array-1 bit-array-2 result-bit-array)
- '(simple-bit-vector simple-bit-vector simple-bit-vector) '*
- :eval-name t :node node :policy (>= speed space))
- `(progn
- ,@(unless (policy node (zerop safety))
- '((unless (= (length bit-array-1) (length bit-array-2)
- (length result-bit-array))
- (error "Argument and/or result bit arrays are not the same length:~
+;;; FIXME: This is a lot of repeatedly macroexpanded code. It should
+;;; be a function call instead.
+(macrolet ((def (bitfun wordfun)
+ `(deftransform ,bitfun ((bit-array-1 bit-array-2 result-bit-array)
+ (simple-bit-vector
+ simple-bit-vector
+ simple-bit-vector)
+ *
+ :node node :policy (>= speed space))
+ `(progn
+ ,@(unless (policy node (zerop safety))
+ '((unless (= (length bit-array-1)
+ (length bit-array-2)
+ (length result-bit-array))
+ (error "Argument and/or result bit arrays are not the same length:~
~% ~S~% ~S ~% ~S"
- bit-array-1 bit-array-2 result-bit-array))))
- (do ((index sb!vm:vector-data-offset (1+ index))
- (end (+ sb!vm:vector-data-offset
- (truncate (the index
- (+ (length bit-array-1)
- sb!vm:word-bits -1))
- sb!vm:word-bits))))
- ((= index end) result-bit-array)
- (declare (optimize (speed 3) (safety 0))
- (type index index end))
- (setf (%raw-bits result-bit-array index)
- (,wordfun (%raw-bits bit-array-1 index)
- (%raw-bits bit-array-2 index))))))))
+ bit-array-1
+ bit-array-2
+ result-bit-array))))
+ (let ((length (length result-bit-array)))
+ (if (= length 0)
+ ;; We avoid doing anything to 0-length
+ ;; bit-vectors, or rather, the memory that
+ ;; follows them. Other divisible-by-32 cases
+ ;; are handled by the (1- length), below.
+ ;; CSR, 2002-04-24
+ result-bit-array
+ (do ((index sb!vm:vector-data-offset (1+ index))
+ (end-1 (+ sb!vm:vector-data-offset
+ ;; bit-vectors of length 1-32
+ ;; need precisely one (SETF
+ ;; %RAW-BITS), done here in the
+ ;; epilogue. - CSR, 2002-04-24
+ (truncate (truly-the index (1- length))
+ sb!vm:n-word-bits))))
+ ((= index end-1)
+ (setf (%raw-bits result-bit-array index)
+ (,',wordfun (%raw-bits bit-array-1 index)
+ (%raw-bits bit-array-2 index)))
+ result-bit-array)
+ (declare (optimize (speed 3) (safety 0))
+ (type index index end-1))
+ (setf (%raw-bits result-bit-array index)
+ (,',wordfun (%raw-bits bit-array-1 index)
+ (%raw-bits bit-array-2 index))))))))))
+ (def bit-and 32bit-logical-and)
+ (def bit-ior 32bit-logical-or)
+ (def bit-xor 32bit-logical-xor)
+ (def bit-eqv 32bit-logical-eqv)
+ (def bit-nand 32bit-logical-nand)
+ (def bit-nor 32bit-logical-nor)
+ (def bit-andc1 32bit-logical-andc1)
+ (def bit-andc2 32bit-logical-andc2)
+ (def bit-orc1 32bit-logical-orc1)
+ (def bit-orc2 32bit-logical-orc2))
(deftransform bit-not
((bit-array result-bit-array)
(error "Argument and result bit arrays are not the same length:~
~% ~S~% ~S"
bit-array result-bit-array))))
- (do ((index sb!vm:vector-data-offset (1+ index))
- (end (+ sb!vm:vector-data-offset
- (truncate (the index
- (+ (length bit-array)
- (1- sb!vm:word-bits)))
- sb!vm:word-bits))))
- ((= index end) result-bit-array)
- (declare (optimize (speed 3) (safety 0))
- (type index index end))
- (setf (%raw-bits result-bit-array index)
- (32bit-logical-not (%raw-bits bit-array index))))))
+ (let ((length (length result-bit-array)))
+ (if (= length 0)
+ ;; We avoid doing anything to 0-length bit-vectors, or
+ ;; rather, the memory that follows them. Other
+ ;; divisible-by-32 cases are handled by the (1- length),
+ ;; below. CSR, 2002-04-24
+ result-bit-array
+ (do ((index sb!vm:vector-data-offset (1+ index))
+ (end-1 (+ sb!vm:vector-data-offset
+ ;; bit-vectors of length 1-32 need precisely
+ ;; one (SETF %RAW-BITS), done here in the
+ ;; epilogue. - CSR, 2002-04-24
+ (truncate (truly-the index (1- length))
+ sb!vm:n-word-bits))))
+ ((= index end-1)
+ (setf (%raw-bits result-bit-array index)
+ (32bit-logical-not (%raw-bits bit-array index)))
+ result-bit-array)
+ (declare (optimize (speed 3) (safety 0))
+ (type index index end-1))
+ (setf (%raw-bits result-bit-array index)
+ (32bit-logical-not (%raw-bits bit-array index))))))))
\f
-;;;; primitive translator for BYTE-BLT
-
-(def-primitive-translator byte-blt (src src-start dst dst-start dst-end)
+;;;; %BYTE-BLT
- ;; new version
- ;;
- ;; FIXME: CMU CL had a hairier implementation of this. It had the
- ;; small problem that it didn't work for large (>16M) values of
- ;; SRC-START or DST-START. However, it might have been more
- ;; efficient. In particular, I haven't checked how much the foreign
- ;; function call costs us here. My guess is that if the overhead is
+;;; FIXME: The old CMU CL code used various COPY-TO/FROM-SYSTEM-AREA
+;;; stuff (with all the associated bit-index cruft and overflow
+;;; issues) even for byte moves. In SBCL, we're converting to byte
+;;; moves as problems are discovered with the old code, and this is
+;;; currently (ca. sbcl-0.6.12.30) the main interface for code in
+;;; SB!KERNEL and SB!SYS (e.g. i/o code). It's not clear that it's the
+;;; ideal interface, though, and it probably deserves some thought.
+(deftransform %byte-blt ((src src-start dst dst-start dst-end)
+ ((or (simple-unboxed-array (*)) system-area-pointer)
+ index
+ (or (simple-unboxed-array (*)) system-area-pointer)
+ index
+ index))
+ ;; FIXME: CMU CL had a hairier implementation of this (back when it
+ ;; was still called (%PRIMITIVE BYTE-BLT). It had the small problem
+ ;; that it didn't work for large (>16M) values of SRC-START or
+ ;; DST-START. However, it might have been more efficient. In
+ ;; particular, I don't really know how much the foreign function
+ ;; call costs us here. My guess is that if the overhead is
;; acceptable for SQRT and COS, it's acceptable here, but this
;; should probably be checked. -- WHN
- (once-only ((dst-start dst-start))
- `(flet ((sap (thing)
- (etypecase thing
- (system-area-pointer thing)
- ((simple-unboxed-array (*)) (vector-sap thing)))))
- (declare (inline sap))
- (without-gcing
- (memmove (sap+ (sap ,dst) ,dst-start)
- (sap+ (sap ,src) ,src-start)
- (- ,dst-end ,dst-start))))))
+ '(flet ((sapify (thing)
+ (etypecase thing
+ (system-area-pointer thing)
+ ;; FIXME: The code here rather relies on the simple
+ ;; unboxed array here having byte-sized entries. That
+ ;; should be asserted explicitly, I just haven't found
+ ;; a concise way of doing it. (It would be nice to
+ ;; declare it in the DEFKNOWN too.)
+ ((simple-unboxed-array (*)) (vector-sap thing)))))
+ (declare (inline sapify))
+ (without-gcing
+ (memmove (sap+ (sapify dst) dst-start)
+ (sap+ (sapify src) src-start)
+ (- dst-end dst-start)))
+ nil))
\f
;;;; transforms for EQL of floating point values
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff