;;; where this information came from:
;;; :ASSUMED = from uses of the object
;;; :DEFINED = from examination of the definition
+;;; :DEFINED-METHOD = implicit, incremental declaration by CLOS.
;;; :DECLARED = from a declaration
-;;; :DEFINED trumps :ASSUMED, and :DECLARED trumps :DEFINED.
+;;; :DEFINED trumps :ASSUMED, :DEFINED-METHOD trumps :DEFINED,
+;;; and :DECLARED trumps :DEFINED-METHOD.
;;; :DEFINED and :ASSUMED are useful for issuing compile-time warnings,
-;;; and :DECLARED is useful for ANSIly specializing code which
-;;; implements the function, or which uses the function's return values.
+;;; :DEFINED-METHOD and :DECLARED are useful for ANSIly specializing
+;;; code which implements the function, or which uses the function's
+;;; return values.
(define-info-type
:class :function
:type :where-from
- :type-spec (member :declared :assumed :defined)
+ :type-spec (member :declared :defined-method :assumed :defined)
:default
;; Again (as in DEFINE-INFO-TYPE :CLASS :FUNCTION :TYPE :KIND) it's
;; not clear how to generalize the FBOUNDP expression to the