(declaim (ftype (function (continuation) ctype) continuation-type))
(defun continuation-type (cont)
(single-value-type (continuation-derived-type cont)))
+
+;;; If CONT is an argument of a function, return a type which the
+;;; function checks CONT for.
+#!-sb-fluid (declaim (inline continuation-externally-checkable-type))
+(defun continuation-externally-checkable-type (cont)
+ (or (continuation-%externally-checkable-type cont)
+ (%continuation-%externally-checkable-type cont)))
+(defun %continuation-%externally-checkable-type (cont)
+ (declare (type continuation cont))
+ (let ((dest (continuation-dest cont)))
+ (if (not (and dest (combination-p dest)))
+ ;; TODO: MV-COMBINATION
+ (setf (continuation-%externally-checkable-type cont) *wild-type*)
+ (let* ((fun (combination-fun dest))
+ (args (combination-args dest))
+ (fun-type (continuation-type fun)))
+ (if (or (not (fun-type-p fun-type))
+ ;; FUN-TYPE might be (AND FUNCTION (SATISFIES ...)).
+ (fun-type-wild-args fun-type))
+ (progn (dolist (arg args)
+ (when arg
+ (setf (continuation-%externally-checkable-type arg)
+ *wild-type*)))
+ *wild-type*)
+ (let* ((arg-types (append (fun-type-required fun-type)
+ (fun-type-optional fun-type)
+ (let ((rest (list (or (fun-type-rest fun-type)
+ *wild-type*))))
+ (setf (cdr rest) rest)))))
+ ;; TODO: &KEY
+ (loop
+ for arg of-type continuation in args
+ and type of-type ctype in arg-types
+ do (when arg
+ (setf (continuation-%externally-checkable-type arg)
+ type)))
+ (continuation-%externally-checkable-type cont)))))))
\f
;;;; interface routines used by optimizers
(setf (block-type-check (node-block node)) t)))
(values))
-;;; Annotate Node to indicate that its result has been proven to be
-;;; typep to RType. After IR1 conversion has happened, this is the
+;;; Annotate NODE to indicate that its result has been proven to be
+;;; TYPEP to RTYPE. After IR1 conversion has happened, this is the
;;; only correct way to supply information discovered about a node's
-;;; type. If you screw with the Node-Derived-Type directly, then
+;;; type. If you screw with the NODE-DERIVED-TYPE directly, then
;;; information may be lost and reoptimization may not happen.
;;;
-;;; What we do is intersect Rtype with Node's Derived-Type. If the
+;;; What we do is intersect RTYPE with NODE's DERIVED-TYPE. If the
;;; intersection is different from the old type, then we do a
-;;; Reoptimize-Continuation on the Node-Cont.
+;;; REOPTIMIZE-CONTINUATION on the NODE-CONT.
(defun derive-node-type (node rtype)
(declare (type node node) (type ctype rtype))
(let ((node-type (node-derived-type node)))
(reoptimize-continuation (node-cont node))))))
(values))
+(defun set-continuation-type-assertion (cont atype ctype)
+ (declare (type continuation cont) (type ctype atype ctype))
+ (when (eq atype *wild-type*)
+ (return-from set-continuation-type-assertion))
+ (let* ((old-atype (continuation-asserted-type cont))
+ (old-ctype (continuation-type-to-check cont))
+ (new-atype (values-type-intersection old-atype atype))
+ (new-ctype (values-type-intersection old-ctype ctype)))
+ (when (or (type/= old-atype new-atype)
+ (type/= old-ctype new-ctype))
+ (setf (continuation-asserted-type cont) new-atype)
+ (setf (continuation-type-to-check cont) new-ctype)
+ (do-uses (node cont)
+ (setf (block-attributep (block-flags (node-block node))
+ type-check type-asserted)
+ t))
+ (reoptimize-continuation cont)))
+ (values))
+
;;; This is similar to DERIVE-NODE-TYPE, but asserts that it is an
;;; error for CONT's value not to be TYPEP to TYPE. If we improve the
;;; assertion, we set TYPE-CHECK and TYPE-ASSERTED to guarantee that
;;; the new assertion will be checked.
-(defun assert-continuation-type (cont type)
+(defun assert-continuation-type (cont type policy)
(declare (type continuation cont) (type ctype type))
- (let ((cont-type (continuation-asserted-type cont)))
- (unless (eq cont-type type)
- (let ((int (values-type-intersection cont-type type)))
- (when (type/= cont-type int)
- (setf (continuation-asserted-type cont) int)
- (do-uses (node cont)
- (setf (block-attributep (block-flags (node-block node))
- type-check type-asserted)
- t))
- (reoptimize-continuation cont)))))
- (values))
+ (when (eq type *wild-type*)
+ (return-from assert-continuation-type))
+ (set-continuation-type-assertion cont type (maybe-weaken-check type policy)))
;;; Assert that CALL is to a function of the specified TYPE. It is
;;; assumed that the call is legal and has only constants in the
(defun assert-call-type (call type)
(declare (type combination call) (type fun-type type))
(derive-node-type call (fun-type-returns type))
- (let ((args (combination-args call)))
+ (let ((args (combination-args call))
+ (policy (lexenv-policy (node-lexenv call))))
(dolist (req (fun-type-required type))
(when (null args) (return-from assert-call-type))
(let ((arg (pop args)))
- (assert-continuation-type arg req)))
+ (assert-continuation-type arg req policy)))
(dolist (opt (fun-type-optional type))
(when (null args) (return-from assert-call-type))
(let ((arg (pop args)))
- (assert-continuation-type arg opt)))
+ (assert-continuation-type arg opt policy)))
(let ((rest (fun-type-rest type)))
(when rest
(dolist (arg args)
- (assert-continuation-type arg rest))))
+ (assert-continuation-type arg rest policy))))
(dolist (key (fun-type-keywords type))
(let ((name (key-info-name key)))
((null arg))
(when (eq (continuation-value (first arg)) name)
(assert-continuation-type
- (second arg) (key-info-type key)))))))
+ (second arg) (key-info-type key)
+ policy))))))
(values))
\f
;;;; IR1-OPTIMIZE
(setf (component-reoptimize component) nil)
(do-blocks (block component)
(cond
- ((or (block-delete-p block)
- (null (block-pred block))
- (eq (functional-kind (block-home-lambda block)) :deleted))
- (delete-block block))
- (t
- (loop
- (let ((succ (block-succ block)))
- (unless (and succ (null (rest succ)))
- (return)))
-
- (let ((last (block-last block)))
- (typecase last
- (cif
- (flush-dest (if-test last))
- (when (unlink-node last)
- (return)))
- (exit
- (when (maybe-delete-exit last)
- (return)))))
-
- (unless (join-successor-if-possible block)
- (return)))
-
- (when (and (block-reoptimize block) (block-component block))
- (aver (not (block-delete-p block)))
- (ir1-optimize-block block))
-
;; We delete blocks when there is either no predecessor or the
;; block is in a lambda that has been deleted. These blocks
;; would eventually be deleted by DFO recomputation, but doing
;; it here immediately makes the effect available to IR1
;; optimization.
- (when (and (block-flush-p block) (block-component block))
- (aver (not (block-delete-p block)))
- (flush-dead-code block)))))
+ ((or (block-delete-p block)
+ (null (block-pred block)))
+ (delete-block block))
+ ((eq (functional-kind (block-home-lambda block)) :deleted)
+ ;; Preserve the BLOCK-SUCC invariant that almost every block has
+ ;; one successor (and a block with DELETE-P set is an acceptable
+ ;; exception).
+ (mark-for-deletion block)
+ (delete-block block))
+ (t
+ (loop
+ (let ((succ (block-succ block)))
+ (unless (and succ (null (rest succ)))
+ (return)))
+
+ (let ((last (block-last block)))
+ (typecase last
+ (cif
+ (flush-dest (if-test last))
+ (when (unlink-node last)
+ (return)))
+ (exit
+ (when (maybe-delete-exit last)
+ (return)))))
+
+ (unless (join-successor-if-possible block)
+ (return)))
+
+ (when (and (block-reoptimize block) (block-component block))
+ (aver (not (block-delete-p block)))
+ (ir1-optimize-block block))
+
+ (cond ((block-delete-p block)
+ (delete-block block))
+ ((and (block-flush-p block) (block-component block))
+ (flush-dead-code block))))))
(values))
(let ((info (combination-kind node)))
(when (fun-info-p info)
(let ((attr (fun-info-attributes info)))
- (when (and (ir1-attributep attr flushable)
+ (when (and (not (ir1-attributep attr call))
;; ### For now, don't delete potentially
;; flushable calls when they have the CALL
;; attribute. Someday we should look at the
;; functional args to determine if they have
;; any side effects.
- (not (ir1-attributep attr call)))
+ (if (policy node (= safety 3))
+ (and (ir1-attributep attr flushable)
+ (every (lambda (arg)
+ ;; FIXME: when bug 203
+ ;; will be fixed, remove
+ ;; this check
+ (member (continuation-type-check arg)
+ '(nil :deleted)))
+ (basic-combination-args node))
+ (valid-fun-use node
+ (info :function :type
+ (leaf-source-name (ref-leaf (continuation-use (basic-combination-fun node)))))
+ :result-test #'always-subtypep
+ :lossage-fun nil
+ :unwinnage-fun nil))
+ (ir1-attributep attr unsafely-flushable)))
(flush-dest (combination-fun node))
(dolist (arg (combination-args node))
(flush-dest arg))
(new-block (continuation-starts-block new-cont)))
(link-node-to-previous-continuation new-node new-cont)
(setf (continuation-dest new-cont) new-node)
+ (setf (continuation-%externally-checkable-type new-cont) nil)
(add-continuation-use new-node dummy-cont)
(setf (block-last new-block) new-node)
(continuation-use (basic-combination-fun call))
call))
((not leaf))
- ((or (info :function :source-transform (leaf-source-name leaf))
- (and info
- (ir1-attributep (fun-info-attributes info)
- predicate)
- (let ((dest (continuation-dest (node-cont call))))
- (and dest (not (if-p dest))))))
- (when (and (leaf-has-source-name-p leaf)
- ;; FIXME: This SYMBOLP is part of a literal
- ;; translation of a test in the old CMU CL
- ;; source, and it's not quite clear what
- ;; the old source meant. Did it mean "has a
- ;; valid name"? Or did it mean "is an
- ;; ordinary function name, not a SETF
- ;; function"? Either way, the old CMU CL
- ;; code probably didn't deal with SETF
- ;; functions correctly, and neither does
- ;; this new SBCL code, and that should be fixed.
- (symbolp (leaf-source-name leaf)))
- (let ((dummies (make-gensym-list (length
- (combination-args call)))))
- (transform-call call
- `(lambda ,dummies
- (,(leaf-source-name leaf)
- ,@dummies))
- (leaf-source-name leaf))))))))))
+ ((and (leaf-has-source-name-p leaf)
+ (or (info :function :source-transform (leaf-source-name leaf))
+ (and info
+ (ir1-attributep (fun-info-attributes info)
+ predicate)
+ (let ((dest (continuation-dest (node-cont call))))
+ (and dest (not (if-p dest)))))))
+ ;; FIXME: This SYMBOLP is part of a literal
+ ;; translation of a test in the old CMU CL
+ ;; source, and it's not quite clear what
+ ;; the old source meant. Did it mean "has a
+ ;; valid name"? Or did it mean "is an
+ ;; ordinary function name, not a SETF
+ ;; function"? Either way, the old CMU CL
+ ;; code probably didn't deal with SETF
+ ;; functions correctly, and neither does
+ ;; this new SBCL code, and that should be fixed.
+ (when (symbolp (leaf-source-name leaf))
+ (let ((dummies (make-gensym-list
+ (length (combination-args call)))))
+ (transform-call call
+ `(lambda ,dummies
+ (,(leaf-source-name leaf)
+ ,@dummies))
+ (leaf-source-name leaf))))))))))
(values))
\f
;;;; known function optimization
(let ((args (mapcar #'continuation-value (combination-args call)))
(fun-name (combination-fun-source-name call)))
(multiple-value-bind (values win)
- (careful-call fun-name args call "constant folding")
+ (careful-call fun-name
+ args
+ call
+ ;; Note: CMU CL had COMPILER-WARN here, and that
+ ;; seems more natural, but it's probably not.
+ ;;
+ ;; It's especially not while bug 173 exists:
+ ;; Expressions like
+ ;; (COND (END
+ ;; (UNLESS (OR UNSAFE? (<= END SIZE)))
+ ;; ...))
+ ;; can cause constant-folding TYPE-ERRORs (in
+ ;; #'<=) when END can be proved to be NIL, even
+ ;; though the code is perfectly legal and safe
+ ;; because a NIL value of END means that the
+ ;; #'<= will never be executed.
+ ;;
+ ;; Moreover, even without bug 173,
+ ;; quite-possibly-valid code like
+ ;; (COND ((NONINLINED-PREDICATE END)
+ ;; (UNLESS (<= END SIZE))
+ ;; ...))
+ ;; (where NONINLINED-PREDICATE is something the
+ ;; compiler can't do at compile time, but which
+ ;; turns out to make the #'<= expression
+ ;; unreachable when END=NIL) could cause errors
+ ;; when the compiler tries to constant-fold (<=
+ ;; END SIZE).
+ ;;
+ ;; So, with or without bug 173, it'd be
+ ;; unnecessarily evil to do a full
+ ;; COMPILER-WARNING (and thus return FAILURE-P=T
+ ;; from COMPILE-FILE) for legal code, so we we
+ ;; use a wimpier COMPILE-STYLE-WARNING instead.
+ #'compiler-style-warn
+ "constant folding")
(if (not win)
(setf (combination-kind call) :error)
(let ((dummies (make-gensym-list (length args))))
(derive-node-type node (continuation-type (set-value node)))
(values))
-;;; Return true if the value of Ref will always be the same (and is
+;;; Return true if the value of REF will always be the same (and is
;;; thus legal to substitute.)
(defun constant-reference-p (ref)
(declare (type ref ref))
(null (lambda-var-sets leaf)))
(defined-fun
(not (eq (defined-fun-inlinep leaf) :notinline)))
+ #!+(and (not sb-fluid) (not sb-xc-host))
(global-var
(case (global-var-kind leaf)
- (:global-function t))))))
+ (:global-function (let ((name (leaf-source-name leaf)))
+ (when (consp name)
+ (aver (eq (first name) 'setf))
+ (setq name (second name)))
+ (eq (symbol-package name)
+ *cl-package*))))))))
;;; If we have a non-set LET var with a single use, then (if possible)
;;; replace the variable reference's CONT with the arg continuation.
(let* ((ref (first (leaf-refs var)))
(cont (node-cont ref))
(cont-atype (continuation-asserted-type cont))
+ (cont-ctype (continuation-type-to-check cont))
(dest (continuation-dest cont)))
(when (and (eq (continuation-use cont) ref)
dest
(lexenv-policy (node-lexenv (continuation-dest arg)))))
(aver (member (continuation-kind arg)
'(:block-start :deleted-block-start :inside-block)))
- (assert-continuation-type arg cont-atype)
+ (set-continuation-type-assertion arg cont-atype cont-ctype)
(setf (node-derived-type ref) *wild-type*)
(change-ref-leaf ref (find-constant nil))
(substitute-continuation arg cont)
(flush-dest (combination-fun use))
(let ((fun-cont (basic-combination-fun call)))
(setf (continuation-dest fun-cont) use)
- (setf (combination-fun use) fun-cont))
+ (setf (combination-fun use) fun-cont)
+ (setf (continuation-%externally-checkable-type fun-cont) nil))
(setf (combination-kind use) :local)
(setf (functional-kind fun) :let)
(flush-dest (first (basic-combination-args call)))
(setf (combination-kind node) :full)
(let ((args (combination-args use)))
(dolist (arg args)
- (setf (continuation-dest arg) node))
+ (setf (continuation-dest arg) node)
+ (setf (continuation-%externally-checkable-type arg) nil))
(setf (combination-args use) nil)
(flush-dest list)
(setf (combination-args node) args))