;; thus the control transfer is a non-local exit.
(not (eq (block-home-lambda block)
(block-home-lambda next)))
- ;; Stack analysis phase wants ENTRY to start a block.
+ ;; Stack analysis phase wants ENTRY to start a block...
(entry-p (block-start-node next))
(let ((last (block-last block)))
(and (valued-node-p last)
(awhen (node-lvar last)
- (consp (lvar-uses it))))))
+ (or
+ ;; ... and a DX-allocator to end a block.
+ (lvar-dynamic-extent it)
+ ;; FIXME: This is a partial workaround for bug 303.
+ (consp (lvar-uses it)))))))
nil)
(t
(join-blocks block next)
(dest (lvar-dest lvar)))
(when (and
;; Think about (LET ((A ...)) (IF ... A ...)): two
- ;; LVAR-USEs should not be met on one path.
+ ;; LVAR-USEs should not be met on one path. Another problem
+ ;; is with dynamic-extent.
(eq (lvar-uses lvar) ref)
(typecase dest
;; we should not change lifetime of unknown values lvars
(eq (node-home-lambda ref)
(lambda-home (lambda-var-home var))))
(setf (node-derived-type ref) *wild-type*)
- (substitute-lvar-uses lvar arg)
+ (substitute-lvar-uses lvar arg
+ ;; Really it is (EQ (LVAR-USES LVAR) REF):
+ t)
(delete-lvar-use ref)
(change-ref-leaf ref (find-constant nil))
(delete-ref ref)