type-restrictions
(lambda (lexenv-lambda default))
(cleanup (lexenv-cleanup default))
+ (handled-conditions (lexenv-handled-conditions default))
+ (disabled-package-locks
+ (lexenv-disabled-package-locks default))
(policy (lexenv-policy default)))
(macrolet ((frob (var slot)
`(let ((old (,slot default)))
(frob blocks lexenv-blocks)
(frob tags lexenv-tags)
(frob type-restrictions lexenv-type-restrictions)
- lambda cleanup policy)))
+ lambda cleanup handled-conditions
+ disabled-package-locks policy)))
;;; Makes a LEXENV, suitable for using in a MACROLET introduced
;;; macroexpander
(lexenv-type-restrictions lexenv) ; XXX
nil
nil
+ (lexenv-handled-conditions lexenv)
+ (lexenv-disabled-package-locks lexenv)
(lexenv-policy lexenv))))
\f
;;;; flow/DFO/component hackery
;; There's no reason to accept this kind of equivocation
;; when compiling our own code, though.
#+sb-xc-host
- (compiler-warn "The variable ~S is defined but never used."
- (leaf-debug-name var)))
+ (warn "The variable ~S is defined but never used."
+ (leaf-debug-name var)))
(setf (leaf-ever-used var) t)))) ; to avoid repeated warnings? -- WHN
(values))